Cited by 94Endometriosis Research and TreatmentPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPlant and fungal interactions

Estrous changes in vaginal nociception in a rat model of endometriosis

Cason, Angie M, Samuelsen, Chad L, Berkley, Karen J·2003·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

A rat model of endometriosis, in which pieces of uterine horn (versus fat in controls) are autotransplanted into the abdomen where they form cysts, reduces fecundity and produces vaginal hyperalgesia. The cysts gradually enlarge over a 2-month period postsurgically and then plateau. Cysts regress with low estrogen levels and reappear when they rise. Based on the hypothesis that the vaginal hyperalgesia depends upon the cysts, this study tested two predictions: that (1) the hyperalgesia would develop postsurgically in parallel with the cysts, and (2) the hyperalgesia would vary with estrous, being greatest when estrogen levels are high (proestrus) and least when low (estrus). In rats trained to escape vaginal distention, percentage escape responses to different distention volumes were measured across the rat's 4-day estrous cycle for 2.5 months before and up to 4 months after autotransplantation of uterus (n=9) or fat (n=6) in abdominal sites. Vaginal pressures were also measured. In rats with uterine but not fat autotransplants, escape percentages increased postsurgically over a 2-month period and then plateaued. The increase was greatest in proestrus and failed to occur in estrus. Vaginal pressures were unchanged in all groups. These results strongly support the hypothesis that the vaginal hyperalgesia depends upon the cysts. Because the cysts were located in sites remote from the vagina, the hyperalgesia involves viscero-visceral interactions and is likely centrally mediated, whereas the estrous modulation could involve hormonal actions either on the cysts or, more likely, on vaginal afferent fibers, and/or on central neurons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0018-506x(03)00121-1

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cason, A. M., Samuelsen, C. L., & Berkley, K. J.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Berkley, Karen J
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
123-131
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004169894
Cited by
94
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1R01 NS 11892, R01NS011892)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and fungal interactions
Keywords
endometriosis, estrous cycle, estrogen, visceral nociception, endometriotic cysts, vaginal distention, escape behavior, vaginal pressure, central pain modulation
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Cysts, Disease Models, Animal, Dyspareunia, Endometriosis, Escape Reaction, Estrogens, Female, Hyperalgesia, Pain Measurement, Uterus, Vagina, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Estrous Cycle, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review