Cited by 7,762Animal testing and alternativesVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals.

Zimmermann, Manfred·1983·Pain

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90201-4

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zimmermann, M.
Corresponding author
Zimmermann, Manfred
Venue
Pain
Published
1983-06
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
109-110
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087454739
Cited by
7,762
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 172 · 2023: 180 · 2022: 212 · 2021: 228 · 2020: 271 · 2019: 260 · 2018: 326 · 2017: 338 · 2016: 326 · 2015: 381 · 2014: 410 · 2013: 409 · 2012: 406
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
experimental pain, conscious animals, animal welfare, moral norms, pain research, animal experimentation
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Laboratory, Ethics, Professional, International Cooperation, Pain, Animal Experimentation, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review