Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Estimation of the percentage of free steroid in undiluted serum by centrifugal ultrafiltration-dialysis.

Open access
Hammond, G.L., Nisker, J.A., Jones, L.A., Siiteri, P.K.·1980·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

A new method is described for the estimation of the percentages of free steroids in undiluted serum or plasma. Samples were incubated with 3H-steroid and [14C]glucose, and duplicate aliquots of the mixture were subjected to centrifugal ultrafiltration through a dialysis membrane at 37 degrees C. The percentages of free estradiol, testosterone, and progesterone in serum were estimated by comparing the ratio of 3H-steroid to [14C]glucose in the ultrafiltrate with the corresponding ratio in the serum retained by the dialysis membrane. In addition to being highly reproducible, the present method affords several advantages over existing methods. The use of [14C]glucose to monitor the movement of unbound serum components obviates measurement of the ultrafiltrate volume, and because the ultrafiltrate remains in contact with the dialysis membrane, small molecular weight components are able to pass through the dialysis membrane in either direction during centrifugal ultrafiltration. This latter feature, which could be described as "isodialysis," allows the estimation of the percentage of free steroid under conditions which closely approximate the in vivo situation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)70742-x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hammond, G. L., Nisker, J. A., Jones, L. A., & Siiteri, P. K.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1980-06
Volume
255
Issue
11
Pages
5023-5026
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1517007955
Cited by
268
References
0
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.