Cited by 74Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and HealthMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Differential effect of resistance training on the body composition and liporotein-lipid profile in older men and women

Joseph, Lyndon J.O., Davey, Stephanie L., Evans, William J., Campbell, Wayne W.·1999·Metabolism

Abstract

The effects of a 12-week resistance exercise training (RT) program on body composition and serum lipid concentrations were assessed in weight-stable, moderately overweight older men (n = 18) and women (n = 17) aged 54 to 71 years with a body mass index (BMI) of 26 to 36 kg/m2. Following RT, the men had a significant increase in fat-free mass (FFM) and a decrease in percent body fat (%BF) and fat mass (FM), whereas the women demonstrated no change, resulting in significant time-by-sex interactions for FFM (P = .002), %BF (P = .006), and FM (P = .005). There were no changes in total cholesterol (Chol), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), or triacylglycerol (Tg) due to RT. However, following RT, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) increased (0.06+/-0.02 mmol/L) in the men and decreased (0.09+/-0.03 mmol/L) in the women (time-by-sex interaction, P = .0004). The Chol/HDL-C ratio decreased (0.36+/-0.11) in the men and increased (0.29+/-0.10) in the women (time-by-sex interaction, P = .0001). For all subjects combined, the changes in HDL-C and the Chol/HDL-C ratio were not related to any changes in body fat stores (ie, %BF or FM), suggesting that RT may potentially alter the lipoprotein-lipid profile in older weight-stable men and women. In conclusion, although the changes in the lipoprotein-lipid profile were small, the men had a significantly increased HDL-C level and decreased Chol/HDL-C ratio, while the women demonstrated opposite changes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0026-0495(99)90162-2

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous work reported significant PCSK9 reductions accompanied by lower LDL levels after 3 months of regular exercise training.

    “Previous work reported significant PCSK9 reductions accompanied by lower LDL levels after 3 months of regular exercise training [40].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joseph, L. J. O., Davey, S. L., Evans, W. J., & Campbell, W. W.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Campbell, Wayne W.
Venue
Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-11
Volume
48
Issue
11
Pages
1474-1480
ISSN
0026-0495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023829140
Cited by
74
References
48
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7r01ag011811-07)
  • National Institute on Aging (T32AG000048, R01-AG-11811, R29AG013409)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
resistance training, older adults, sex differences, body composition, fat-free mass, fat mass, HDL cholesterol, overweight
MeSH terms
Aged, Body Composition, Cholesterol, Female, Humans, Lipids, Lipoproteins, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Triglycerides, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review