Cited by 110Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudySmoking Behavior and CessationNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The role of nicotinic receptor beta-2 subunits in nicotine discrimination and conditioned taste aversion

Open access
Shoaib, M., Gommans, J., Morley, A., Stolerman, I.P., Grailhe, R., Changeux, J.-P.·2002·Neuropharmacology

Abstract

The subtypes of nicotinic receptors at which the behavioural effects of nicotine originate are not fully understood. These experiments use mice lacking the beta2 subunit of nicotinic receptors to investigate its role in nicotine discrimination and conditioned taste aversion (CTA). Wild-type and mutant mice were trained either in a two-lever nicotine discrimination procedure using a tandem schedule of food reinforcement, or in a counterbalanced two-flavour CTA procedure. Rates of lever-pressing of wild-type and mutant mice did not differ. Wild-type mice acquired discrimination of nicotine (0.4 or 0.8 mg/kg) rapidly and exhibited steep dose-response curves. Mutant mice failed to acquire these nicotine discriminations and exhibited flat dose-response curves. Both wild-type and mutant mice acquired discrimination of nicotine (1.6 mg/kg) although discrimination performance was weak in the mutants. Nicotine initially reduced response rates in wild-type and mutant mice, and tolerance developed to this effect in each genotype. Both genotypes acquired discrimination of morphine (3 mg/kg) with similar degrees of accuracy, and dose-response curves for morphine discrimination in the two genotypes were indistinguishable. Nicotine produced dose-related CTA in both genotypes, but the magnitude of the effect was less in the mutants than in the wild-type controls. It is concluded that nicotinic receptors containing the beta2 subunit play a major role in the discriminative stimulus and taste a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0028-3908(01)00194-0

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shoaib, M., Gommans, J., Morley, A., Stolerman, I. P., Grailhe, R., & Changeux, J.-P.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Institut Pasteur (FR)
Corresponding author
Stolerman, I.P.
Venue
Neuropharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-03
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
530-539
ISSN
0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040143361
Cited by
110
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  • European Commission
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, beta2 subunit, nicotine discrimination, conditioned taste aversion, nicotine tolerance, dose-response relationship, tobacco dependence, discriminative stimulus, response rate
MeSH terms
Animals, Conditioning, Psychological, Discrimination, Psychological, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nicotine, Receptors, Nicotinic, Taste, Mice, Knockout, Nicotinic Agonists, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review