Cited by 63Regulation of Appetite and ObesityHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Effects of age on the feeding response to moderately low dietary protein in rats

White, B.Douglas, Porter, Marty H, Martin, Roy J·2000·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Moderately low levels of dietary protein are associated with increased food intake and body fat. We propose that the generation of this feeding signal is dependent on the level of dietary protein relative to the protein requirement of the animal, that is, that protein-dependent feeding is maximized when the level of dietary protein is around the animal's protein requirement. One of the factors that affects an animal's protein requirement is age. We predict that young, growing animals are more responsive to a moderately low level of dietary protein than are mature animals. The feeding response to moderately low dietary protein (10% casein) was determined in young ( approximately 190 g) and more mature ( approximately 340 g) Sprague-Dawley rats for 12 days. As an index of amino acid deamination, serum urea nitrogen concentrations were determined, as was the in vitro release of neuropeptide Y (NPY) from hypothalamic tissue containing the paraventricular nucleus. Young rats were more responsive to the feeding effects of moderately low dietary protein than mature animals. In young rats, cumulative food intake was inversely correlated with serum urea nitrogen concentration. No correlation was found in mature animals. Although the amount of NPY remaining in hypothalamic tissue after incubation was significantly greater (p = 0.04) in young rats fed 10% casein as compared with rats fed the standard 20% casein diet, no dietary difference in K(+)-stimulated NPY release was observed. We hypothesize that the signal for low-protein-induced hyperphagia is a reduction in a compound whose production is coupled to the level of amino acid deamination in the brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0031-9384(99)00229-2

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, B. D., Porter, M. H., & Martin, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
White, B.Douglas
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-03
Volume
68
Issue
5
Pages
673-681
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027148367
Cited by
63
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
dietary protein, age effects, hyperphagia, low-protein diet, protein requirements, neuropeptide Y, hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus, amino acid deamination, blood urea nitrogen, dietary intake, fat mass, rats
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Body Composition, Body Water, Body Weight, Caseins, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Dietary Proteins, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Hypothalamus, Male, Neuropeptide Y, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review