The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Group Tasks, Group Interaction Process, and Group Performance Effectiveness: A Review and Proposed Integration
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Employee reactions to job characteristics.
Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031152 · Cited by 2,442
Self-citation
Cited by
Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7 · Cited by 8,962
Self-citationTask versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741 · Cited by 3,071
Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork?
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496405277134 · Cited by 1,930
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259182 · Cited by 3,659
A Socially Embedded Model of Thriving at Work
Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0153 · Cited by 1,604
Cohesion and Performance in Groups: A Meta-Analytic Clarification of Construct Relations.
Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989 · Cited by 1,321
Habitual routines in task-performing groups
Gersick, C. J. G., & Hackman, J. R. (1990) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(90)90047-d · Cited by 1,048
Self-citationInteractions Within Groups and Subgroups: The Effects of Demographic Faultlines
Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.17843943 · Cited by 831
Taggar, S. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069349 · Cited by 834
A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology.
Mathieu, J. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Ilgen, D. R. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000128 · Cited by 593
Brickson, S. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.2791604 · Cited by 556
Do team processes really have an effect on clinical performance? A systematic literature review
Schmutz, J., & Manser, T. (2013) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aes513 · Cited by 366
Virtual teams in organizations.
Dulebohn, J. H., & Hoch, J. E. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.004 · Cited by 342
Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups.
Larson, J. R., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Keys, C. B. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.446 · Cited by 319
Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis
Paris, C. R., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130050084879 · Cited by 308
What makes a good team player? Personality and team effectiveness.
Driskell, J. E., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & O'Shea, P. G. (2006) · Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.10.4.249 · Cited by 260
Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness
Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Rapp, T. L., & Gilson, L. L. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1772 · Cited by 225
Groups perform better than the best individuals on Letters-to-Numbers problems
Laughlin, P. R., Bonner, B. L., & Miner, A. G. (2002) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00003-1 · Cited by 218
Group intelligence: why some groups are better than others
Williams, W. M., & Sternberg, R. J. (1988) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0160-2896(88)90002-5 · Cited by 196
Robots in Groups and Teams: A Literature Review
Sebo, S., Stoll, B., Scassellati, B., & Jung, M. F. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3415247 · Cited by 158
Virtual training: Making reality work?
Bertram, J., Moskaliuk, J., & Cress, U. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.032 · Cited by 137
Johnson, S. K., Bettenhausen, K., & Gibbons, E. (2009) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496409346448 · Cited by 94
Häusser, J. A., Junker, N. M., & van Dick, R. (2020) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2668 · Cited by 91
Fok, R., & Weld, D. S. (2024) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1002/aaai.12182 · Cited by 81
Research on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (1997) · Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1016/b978-044481862-1.50125-4 · Cited by 75
Automation use and automation bias
Mosier, K. L., & Skitka, L. J. (1999) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193129904300346 · Cited by 69
Aircrews and automation bias: the advantages of teamwork?
Mosier, K. L., Skitka, L. J., Dunbar, M., & McDonnell, L. (2001) · The International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap1101_1 · Cited by 62
Fok, R., & Weld, D. S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.07722 · Cited by 54
Wenger, A. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137577 · Cited by 40
Criteria Issues and Team Effectiveness
Mathieu, J. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology, Volume 2 · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928286.013.0027 · Cited by 34
GROUPTHINK THEORY AND RESEARCH: IMPLICATIONS FOR DECISION MAKING IN GERIATRIC HEALTH CARE TEAMS
Heinemann, G. D., Farrell, M. P., & Schmitt, M. H. (1994) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/0360127940200106 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G.
- Venue
- Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1975
- Pages
- 45-99
- ISSN
- 0065-2601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1547377254
- Cited by
- 1,350
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.76
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
