Cited by 260Stress Responses and CortisolMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

The Maternal Separation Paradigm and Adult Emotionality and Cognition in Male and Female Wistar Rats

Lehmann, J, Pryce, C.R, Bettschen, D, Feldon, J·1999·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

A single 24-h maternal separation (MS) in the rat during the stress hyporesponsive period alters adult behavior and neuroendocrine stress response. The age of the animal at MS might be a crucial factor for effects in adulthood. We report here on adult behavioral effects of MS performed on postnatal day 4 (MS4), 9 (MS9), or 18 (MS18) in male and female Wistar rats. Unrelated subjects were used to avoid confounding litter effects. Subjects were tested on paradigms of unconditioned fear/anxiety, i.e., open field and elevated plus-maze, and on paradigms involving learning in an aversive situation, i.e., conditioned freezing, active avoidance, and water maze. In line with our predictions we obtained (a) sex differences that were consistent with enhanced fear/anxiety in males relative to females, (b) evidence that MS4 yielded deficits in active avoidance learning and conditioned freezing (trend level), whereas MS9 yielded enhanced active avoidance and water maze learning, (c) evidence (at trend level) that these effects of MS are greater in males than in females. There was no evidence for an effect of MS on paradigms of unconditioned fear/anxiety. We conclude that MS, irrespective of the age at separation, does not provide a robust environmental model of modified behavior in aversive situations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0091-3057(99)00150-1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maternal separation tends to elicit higher anxiety-like behaviors in male offspring compared with females.

    “Additionally, sex differences should also be taken into consideration as it has been reported that maternal separation tends to illicit higher anxiety-like behaviors in male offspring compared with females (Lehmann et al., 1999).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lehmann, J., Pryce, C. R., Bettschen, D., & Feldon, J.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Feldon, J
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-12
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
705-715
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044364684
Cited by
260
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 17
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
maternal separation, early life stress, sex differences, anxiety, fear, active avoidance, water maze learning, conditioned freezing, adult behavior, Wistar rats
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Cognition, Conditioning, Psychological, Emotions, Female, Male, Maternal Deprivation, Motor Activity, Sex Characteristics, Weaning, Rats, Wistar, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review