Cited by 228Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology ResearchNeuroscience and Music Perception

Brain activity varies with modulation of dynamic pitch variance in sentence melody

Open access
Meyer, Martin, Steinhauer, Karsten, Alter, Kai, Friederici, Angela D., von Cramon, D.Yves·2004·Brain and Language

Abstract

Fourteen native speakers of German heard normal sentences, sentences which were either lacking dynamic pitch variation (flattened speech), or comprised of intonation contour exclusively (degraded speech). Participants were to listen carefully to the sentences and to perform a rehearsal task. Passive listening to flattened speech compared to normal speech produced strong brain responses in right cortical areas, particularly in the posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG). Passive listening to degraded speech compared to either normal or flattened speech particularly involved fronto-opercular and subcortical (Putamen, Caudate Nucleus) regions bilaterally. Additionally the Rolandic operculum (premotor cortex) in the right hemisphere subserved processing of neat sentence intonation. As a function of explicit rehearsing sentence intonation we found several activation foci in the left inferior frontal gyrus (Broca's area), the left inferior precentral sulcus, and the left Rolandic fissure. The data allow several suggestions: First, both flattened and degraded speech evoked differential brain responses in the pSTG, particularly in the planum temporale (PT) bilaterally indicating that this region mediates integration of slowly and rapidly changing acoustic cues during comprehension of spoken language. Second, the bilateral circuit active whilst participants receive degraded speech reflects general effort allocation. Third, the differential finding for passive perception and explicit rehearsal of intonation contour suggests a right fronto-lateral network for processing and a left fronto-lateral network for producing prosodic information. Finally, it appears that brain areas which subserve speech (frontal operculum) and premotor functions (Rolandic operculum) coincidently support the processing of intonation contour in spoken sentence comprehension.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00350-x

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Right hemisphere responses may help explain why the perception of prosody in heard speech is associated with the right hemisphere, particularly when the language demands of the task are low.

    “These right hemisphere responses may help to explain why the perception of prosody in heard speech prosody is associated with the right hemisphere, particularly when the language demands of the task are low (Gandour et al., 2004; Meyer et al., 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyer, M., Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., Friederici, A. D., & von Cramon, D. Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
Corresponding author
Meyer, Martin
Venue
Brain and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
277-289
ISSN
0093-934X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086468443
Cited by
228
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 19
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain and Language (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
sentence intonation, degraded speech, spoken sentence comprehension, posterior superior temporal gyrus, planum temporale, premotor cortex, Broca's area, prosodic processing, effort allocation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Auditory Pathways, Brain Mapping, Caudate Nucleus, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Phonetics, Pitch Perception, Practice, Psychological, Putamen, Semantics, Sound Spectrography, Speech Acoustics, Speech Perception, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review