Cited by 270Muscle Physiology and DisordersMuscle metabolism and nutritionMuscle and Compartmental Disorders

PREVENTION OF DISUSE MUSCLE ATROPHY BY MEANS OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION: MAINTENANCE OF PROTEIN SYNTHESIS

Gibson, J.N.A., Smith, K., Rennie, M.J.·1988·The Lancet

Abstract

The effect of percutaneous electrical stimulation in preventing immobilisation-induced muscle atrophy was determined from measurements of quadriceps mass, composition, and rate of protein synthesis in seven men who had a fracture of one tibia immobilised in a long-leg cast for 6 weeks. These features were compared with those of fourteen men with similar injuries who did not use an electrical stimulator. In men who did not use the stimulator, quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) at midthigh, measured by ultrasonography, fell by a mean (SD) 17 (10)% and the rate of muscle protein synthesis was 23 (10)% lower on the immobilised than on the control side (0.037 [0.016] vs 0.048 [0.02]%/h). In contrast, in those who used the stimulator, quadriceps CSA (55.5 [7.3]) cm2 control leg, 50.9 [9.0] cm2 immobilised leg) and the rate of muscle protein synthesis (0.053 [0.009] %/h control leg, 0.059 [0.012] %/h immobilised leg) were similar on the two sides. The results suggest that brief periods of low-voltage percutaneous electrical stimulation will reduce quadriceps atrophy secondary to knee immobilisation, and that the mechanism includes prevention of the fall in muscle protein synthesis that usually occurs on immobilisation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)92417-8

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gibson, J. N. A., Smith, K., & Rennie, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-10
Volume
332
Issue
8614
Pages
767-770
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W1967174207
Cited by
270
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Muscle and Compartmental Disorders
Keywords
disuse atrophy, percutaneous electrical stimulation, muscle protein synthesis, immobilization, quadriceps, tibial fractures, long leg cast, cross-sectional area
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Immobilization, Male, Middle Aged, Muscle Contraction, Muscle Proteins, Muscular Atrophy, Self Care, Tibial Fractures, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review