Cited by 2,122Fatty Acid Research and HealthNutritional Studies and DietLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mediterranean alpha-linolenic acid-rich diet in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease

Abstract

In a prospective, randomised single-blinded secondary prevention trial we compared the effect of a Mediterranean alpha-linolenic acid-rich diet to the usual post-infarct prudent diet. After a first myocardial infarction, patients were randomly assigned to the experimental (n = 302) or control group (n = 303). Patients were seen again 8 weeks after randomisation, and each year for 5 years. The experimental group consumed significantly less lipids, saturated fat, cholesterol, and linoleic acid but more oleic and alpha-linolenic acids confirmed by measurements in plasma. Serum lipids, blood pressure, and body mass index remained similar in the 2 groups. In the experimental group, plasma levels of albumin, vitamin E, and vitamin C were increased, and granulocyte count decreased. After a mean follow up of 27 months, there were 16 cardiac deaths in the control and 3 in the experimental group; 17 non-fatal myocardial infarction in the control and 5 in the experimental groups: a risk ratio for these two main endpoints combined of 0.27 (95% CI 0.12-0.59, p = 0.001) after adjustment for prognostic variables. Overall mortality was 20 in the control, 8 in the experimental group, an adjusted risk ratio of 0.30 (95% CI 0.11-0.82, p = 0.02). An alpha-linolenic acid-rich Mediterranean diet seems to be more efficient than presently used diets in the secondary prevention of coronary events and death.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92580-1

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lipid Research Clinics Program, 1984, The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial Results, JAMA, 251, 351, 10.1001/jama.251.3.351 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–114 of 114

Metadata

Authors
de Lorgeril, M., Renaud, S., Salen, P., Monjaud, I., Mamelle, N., Martin, J. L., Guidollet, J., Touboul, P., & Delaye, J.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Laboratoire Univers et Théories (FR)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-06
Volume
343
Issue
8911
Pages
1454-1459
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2030042443
Cited by
2,122
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 74
FWCI
60.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
alpha-linolenic acid, Mediterranean diet, secondary prevention, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, oleic acid, linoleic acid, plasma fatty acids, cardiac mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, vitamin E, vitamin C, albumin, granulocyte count
MeSH terms
Coronary Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Single-Blind Method, alpha-Linolenic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review