The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND The Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer has brought together and reanalysed the worldwide epidemiological evidence on the relation between breast cancer risk and use of hormonal contraceptives. METHODS Individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 studies conducted in 25 countries were collected, checked, and analysed centrally. Estimates of the relative risk for breast cancer were obtained by a modification of the Mantel-Haenszel method. All analyses were stratified by study, age at diagnosis, parity, and, where appropriate, the age a woman was when her first child was born, and the age she was when her risk of conception ceased. FINDINGS The results provide strong evidence for two main conclusions. First, while women are taking combined oral contraceptives and in the 10 years after stopping there is a small increase in the relative risk of having breast cancer diagnosed (relative risk [95 percent CI] in current users 1.24 [1.15-1.33], 2p<0.00001; 1-4 years after stopping 1.16 [1.08-1.23], 2p=0.00001; 5-9 years after stopping 1.07 [1.02-1.13], 2p=0.009). Second, there is no significant excess risk of having breast cancer diagnosed 10 or more years after stopping use (relative risk 1.01 [0.96-1.05], NS). The cancers diagnosed in women who had used combined oral contraceptives were less advanced clinically than those diagnosed in women who had never used these contraceptives for ever-users compared with never-users, the relative risk for tumours that had spread beyond the breast compared with localised tumours was 0.88 (0.81-0.95; 2p=0.002). There was no pronounced variation in the results for recency of use between women with different background risks of breast cancer, including women from different countries and ethnic groups, women with different reproductive histories, and those with or without a family history of breast cancer. The studies included in this collaboration represent about 90 percent of the epidemiological information on the topic, and what is known about the other studies suggests that their omission has not materially affected the main conclusions. Other features of hormonal contraceptive use such as duration of use, age at first use, and the dose and type of hormone within the contraceptives had little additional effect on breast cancer risk, once recency of use had been taken into account. Women who began use before age 20 had higher relative risks of having breast cancer diagnosed while they were using combined oral contraceptives and in the 5 years after stopping than women who began use at older ages, but the higher relative risks apply at ages when breast cancer is rare and, for a given duration of use, earlier use does not result in more cancers being diagnosed than use beginning at older ages. Because breast cancer incidence rises steeply with age, the estimated excess number of cancers diagnosed in the period between starting use and 10 years after stopping increases with age at last use: for example, among 10 000 women from Europe or North America who used oral contraceptives from age 16 to 19, from age 20 to 24, and from age 25 to 29, respectively, the estimated excess number of cancers diagnosed up to 10 years after stopping use is 0.5 (95 percent CI 0.3-0.7), 1.5 (0.7-2.3), and 4.7 (2.7-6.7). Up to 20 years after cessation of use the difference between ever-users and never-users is not so much in the total number of cancers diagnosed, but in their clinical presentation, with the breast cancers diagnosed in ever-users being less advanced clinically than those diagnosed in never-users. The relation observed between breast cancer risk and hormone exposure is unusual, and it is not possible to infer from these data whether it is due to an earlier diagnosis of breast cancer in ever-users, the biological effects of hormonal contraceptives, or a combination of reasons...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Estrogen Receptor Null Mice: What Have We Learned and Where Will They Lead Us?
Couse, J. F., & Korach, K. S. (1999) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.20.3.0370 · Cited by 2,045
Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002351 · Cited by 1,406
A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors
Tyrer, J., Duffy, S. W., & Cuzick, J. (2004) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1668 · Cited by 1,345
Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies
Egger, M., Schneider, M., & Smith, G. D. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7125.140 · Cited by 997
Key steps for effective breast cancer prevention
Britt, K. L., Cuzick, J., & Phillips, K.-A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-020-0266-x · Cited by 992
Burke, W. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.277.12.997 · Cited by 955
Henderson, B. E., & Feigelson, H. S. (2000) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/21.3.427 · Cited by 821
The Nurses׳ Health Study: lifestyle and health among women
Colditz, G. A., & Hankinson, S. E. (2005) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1608 · Cited by 590
Physical activity and the risk of breast cancer
Thune, I., Brenn, T., Lund, E., & Gaard, M. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199705013361801 · Cited by 569
Gierisch, J. M., Coeytaux, R. R., Urrutia, R. P., Havrilesky, L. J., Moorman, P. G., Lowery, W. J., Dinan, M., McBroom, A. J., Hasselblad, V., Sanders, G. D., et al. (2013) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-0298 · Cited by 372
Oestrogen exposure and breast cancer risk
Travis, R. C., & Key, T. J. (2003) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/bcr628 · Cited by 346
Physical activity and cancer etiology: associations and mechanisms
McTiernan, A., Ulrich, C., Slate, S., & Potter, J. (1998) · Cancer Causes & Control · doi:10.1023/a:1008853601471 · Cited by 302
Iversen, L., Sivasubramaniam, S., Lee, A. J., Fielding, S., & Hannaford, P. C. (2017) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.002 · Cited by 277
Stanczyk, F. Z., Archer, D. F., & Bhavnani, B. R. (2013) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.12.011 · Cited by 201
Crosignani, P. G., Luciano, A., Ray, A., & Bergqvist, A. (2006) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dei290 · Cited by 179
Gérard, C., & Brown, K. A. (2018) · Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.mce.2017.09.014 · Cited by 136
Winn, D., Lee, Y., Hashibe, M., Boffetta, P., & the INHANCE consortium (2015) · Oral Diseases · doi:10.1111/odi.12342 · Cited by 102
Safety of medical treatments for endometriosis
Berlanda, N., Somigliana, E., Viganò, P., & Vercellini, P. (2016) · Expert Opinion on Drug Safety · doi:10.1517/14740338.2016.1121991 · Cited by 78
Combined Oral Contraceptives: A Comprehensive Review
KILEY, J., & HAMMOND, C. (2007) · Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/grf.0b013e318159c06a · Cited by 72
Chwalisz, K., Surrey, E., & Stanczyk, F. Z. (2012) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1177/1933719112438061 · Cited by 58
Aluminium and human breast diseases
Darbre, P. D., Pugazhendhi, D., & Mannello, F. (2011) · Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2011.07.017 · Cited by 57
Shah, D., Patil, M., & On behalf of the National PCOS Working Group (2018) · Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_72_18 · Cited by 51
Variation in serum biomarkers with sex and female hormonal status: implications for clinical tests
Ramsey, J. M., Cooper, J. D., Penninx, B. W. J. H., & Bahn, S. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep26947 · Cited by 45
Should dermatologists prescribe hormonal contraceptives for acne?
Harper, J. C. (2009) · Dermatologic Therapy · doi:10.1111/j.1529-8019.2009.01261.x · Cited by 27
Associations between breast cancer risk factors and religious practices in Utah
Daniels, M. (2004) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.09.025 · Cited by 26
(2012) · PubMed · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 347
- Issue
- 9017
- Pages
- 1713-1727
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W1536810585
- Cited by
- 1,447
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.