Cited by 281Algal biology and biofuel productionFatty Acid Research and HealthEdible Oils Quality and Analysis

A process for high yield and scaleable recovery of high purity eicosapentaenoic acid esters from microalgae and fish oil

Belarbi, El Hassan, Molina, Emilio, Chisti, Yusuf·2000·Enzyme and Microbial Technology

Abstract

A low expense process is developed for recovering esterified eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) from microalgae and fish oil. Over 70% of the EPA content in the esterified crude extract of microalgae were recovered at purities exceeding 90%. The recovery scheme utilizes either wet or freeze-dried algal biomass. The process consists of only three main steps: 1) simultaneous extraction and transesterification of the algal biomass; 2) argentated silica gel column chromatography of the crude extract; and 3) removal of pigments by a second column chromatographic step. Argentated silica gel chromatography recovered about 70% of the EPA ester present in the crude fatty ester mixture of fish oil, but at a reduced purity ( approximately 83% pure) compared to the microalgal derived EPA. The optimal loading of the fatty ester mixture on the chromatographic support was about 3% (w/w) but loadings up to 4% did not affect the resolution significantly. The process was scaled up by a factor of nearly 320 by increasing the diameter of the chromatography columns. The elution velocity remained constant. Compared to the green alga Monodus subterraneus, the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum had important advantages as a potential commercial producer of EPA. For a microalgal EPA process to be competitive with fish oil derived EPA, P. tricornutum biomass (2.5% w/w EPA) needs to be obtained at less than $4/kg. If the EPA content in the alga are increased to 3.5%, the biomass may command a somewhat higher pr…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0141-0229(99)00191-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Belarbi, E. H., Molina, E., & Chisti, Y.
Affiliations
University of Almería (ES)
Venue
Enzyme and Microbial Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-04
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
516-529
ISSN
0141-0229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035932752
Cited by
281
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 27
FWCI
10.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Enzyme and Microbial Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Keywords
microalgae, fish oil, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, transesterification, pigment removal, scale-up, silver contamination, omega-3 fatty acids, storage stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review