The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cataract surgery and the 5-year incidence of late-stage age-related maculopathy
Abstract
Purpose To assess whether cataract surgery in older persons increases risk for the development of late-stage age-related maculopathy (ARM).Design Combined analysis of longitudinal data from two population-based cohorts, the Beaver Dam Eye Study and Blue Mountains Eye Study.Participants The Beaver Dam Eye Study examined 4926 persons aged 43 years or older at baseline and re-examined 3684 after 5 years. The Blue Mountains Eye Study examined 3654 persons aged 49 years or older at baseline and re-examined 2335 after 5 years.Methods The two studies used similar protocols for retinal photography and photographic grading. We defined incident late-stage ARM as the development of neovascular ARM or geographic atrophy in eyes without either lesion type at baseline that was confirmed by consensus between the study investigators. Nonphakic eyes included eyes that were aphakic or pseudophakic at baseline. Eye-specific data were analyzed. Age- and study site-adjusted relative risks were calculated using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method. Multivariate-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were also estimated using generalized estimating equation models.Results Of the 6019 participants examined after 5 years, 11,391 eyes were considered at risk for developing late-stage ARM, including 315 nonphakic and 11,076 phakic eyes. Late-state ARM (either neovascular ARM or geographic atrophy) developed in 6.0% to 7.5% of nonphakic eyes (10 of 168 right and 11 of 147 left eyes), compared with 0.7% of phakic eyes (40 of 5504 right and 37 of 5572 left eyes) during the 5-year period. Age- and study site-adjusted 5-year relative risks were 2.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-5.1) for right and 3.7 (95% CI, 2.1-6.4) for left eyes. After further adjustment for gender, smoking, and the presence of indistinct or reticular drusen or pigmentary abnormalities at baseline, nonphakic eyes had a substantially higher risk for developing either late-stage ARM lesion compared with phakic eyes, OR = 5.7 (95% CI, 2.4-13.6).Conclusions Pooled findings from these two large population-based cohorts support the hypothesis that cataract surgery in older persons may be associated with an increased subsequent risk for developing late-stage ARM, particularly neovascular ARM.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In total, data from 18 prospective, cross-sectional studies and 8 case control studies [12,24-26,28,30,31,33-47,49-54,57-73] were included in the final analysis, contributing a sample of some 94,058 patients (ranging from 261 to 22,071) including 3,178 (ranging from 8 to 776) late AMD cases.”
From Clinical risk factors for age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2010) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cites
Models for Longitudinal Data: A Generalized Estimating Equation Approach
Zeger, S. L., Liang, K., & Albert, P. S. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531734 · Cited by 4,505
Bird, A. C., Bressler, N. M., Bressler, S. B., Chisholm, I. H., Coscas, G., Davis, M. D., de Jong, P. T. V. M., Klaver, C. C. W., Klein, B. E. K., Klein, R., et al. (1995) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0039-6257(05)80092-x · Cited by 1,926
Self-citationPrevalence of age-related maculopathy
Klein, R., Klein, B. E. K., & Linton, K. L. P. (1992) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31871-8 · Cited by 1,845
Self-citationKlein, R., Klein, R., Moss, S. E., & Linton, K. L. P. (1992) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(92)32011-1 · Cited by 1,382
Self-citationThe Wisconsin Age-related Maculopathy Grading System
Klein, R., Davis, M. D., Magli, Y. L., Segał, P., Klein, R., & Hubbard, L. D. (1991) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32186-9 · Cited by 1,188
Self-citationThe Five-year Incidence and Progression of Age-related Maculopathy
Klein, R., Klein, R., Jensen, S. C., & Meuer, S. M. (1997) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30368-6 · Cited by 1,154
Self-citationPrevalence of age-related maculopathy in Australia
Mitchell, P., Smith, W., Attebo, K., & Wang, J. J. (1995) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30846-9 · Cited by 1,062
Self-citationAge-Specific Prevalence and Causes of Blindness and Visual Impairment in an Older Population
Klaver, C. C. W. (1998) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.116.5.653 · Cited by 893
The Prevalence of Age-related Maculopathy in the Rotterdam Study
Vingerling, J. R., Dielemans, I., Hofman, A., Grobbee, D. E., Hijmering, M., Kramer, C. F. L., & de Jong, P. T. V. M. (1995) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(95)31034-2 · Cited by 815
Visual Acuity and the Causes of Visual Loss in Australia
Attebo, K., Mitchell, P., & Smith, W. (1996) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30684-2 · Cited by 798
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The epidemiology of age-related macular degeneration
Klein, R., Peto, T., Bird, A., & Vannewkirk, M. R. (2004) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2003.11.069 · Cited by 932
Self-citationClinical risk factors for age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Chakravarthy, U., Wong, T. Y., Fletcher, A., Piault, E., Evans, C., Zlateva, G., Buggage, R., Pleil, A., & Mitchell, P. (2010) · BMC Ophthalmology · doi:10.1186/1471-2415-10-31 · Cited by 842
Self-citationRecent developments in age-related macular degeneration: a review
Al-Zamil, W. M., & Yassin, S. A. (2017) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s143508 · Cited by 427
Photochemical Damage of the Retina
Wu, J., Seregard, S., & Algvere, P. V. (2006) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2006.06.009 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J. J., Klein, R., Smith, W., Klein, B. E. K., Tomany, S., & Mitchell, P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mitchell, Paul
- Venue
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1960-1967
- ISSN
- 0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1495502816
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 14.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (EY0-6594, U10EY006594)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal and Macular Surgery
- Keywords
- cataract surgery, age-related maculopathy, geographic atrophy, pseudophakia, aphakia, postoperative risk, Beaver Dam Eye Study, Blue Mountains Eye Study, older adults, fundus photography
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cataract Extraction, Female, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, New South Wales, Risk Factors, Wisconsin, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Odds Ratio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review