Cited by 273Environmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyHeavy metals in environmentHeavy Metal Pollution Remediation

pH-dependent toxicity of copper and uranium to a tropical freshwater alga (Chlorella sp.).

Franklin, Natasha M., Stauber, Jennifer L., Markich, Scott J., Lim, Richard P.·2000·Aquatic Toxicology

Abstract

Copper (Cu) and uranium (U) are of potential ecotoxicological concern to tropical freshwater organisms in northern Australia as a result of mining activity. No local data on the toxicity of these metals to tropical freshwater algae are currently available. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of pH (5.7 and 6.5) on the toxicity of Cu and U to the green alga Chlorella sp. in a synthetic softwater representative of fresh surface waters in sandy-streams of tropical northern Australia. The effects of Cu and U on algal growth (cell division) rate after a 72-h exposure were determined. Intracellular and extracellular (membrane-bound) metal concentrations at the two selected pH values were also compared. Based on the 72-h minimum detectable effect concentrations (MDEC), Chlorella sp. was approximately 20-fold more sensitive to Cu (0.7 and 1.4 µg l(-1) at pH 6.5 and 5.7, respectively) than U (13 and 34 µg l(-1) at pH 6.5 and 5.7, respectively), and more sensitive than other Australian tropical freshwater organisms. The toxicity of Cu and U was highly pH-dependent. Copper concentrations required to inhibit growth (cell division) rate by 50% (72-h EC(50)) increased from 1.5 to 35 µg l(-1) as the pH decreased from 6.5 to 5.7. Similarly, the 72-h EC(50) values for U increased from 44 to 78 µg l(-1) over the same pH range. Calculation of Cu and U speciation using the geochemical model HARPHRQ, showed that differences in the concentrations of the free metal ions (Cu(2+) and UO(2)(2+)) were only minimal (<10%) between pH 5.7 and 6.5. The decreased toxicity at pH 5.7 was due to lower concentrations of cell-bound and intracellular Cu and U compared to those at pH 6.5. These results are explained in terms of the possible mechanism of competition between H(+) and the metal ion at the cell surface.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0166-445x(99)00042-9

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franklin, N. M., Stauber, J. L., Markich, S. J., & Lim, R. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Franklin, Natasha M.
Venue
Aquatic Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-03
Volume
48
Issue
2-3
Pages
275-289
ISSN
0166-445X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035497513
Cited by
273
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
8.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aquatic Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
Keywords
copper toxicity, uranium toxicity, pH dependence, Chlorella, algal growth inhibition, metal speciation, intracellular metal accumulation, mining pollution, northern Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review