The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Our novel alternative to punishment builds on the reciprocal nature of the trust—the fact that people reciprocate voluntary trust68—as well as the conditional nature of human cooperation—the fact that negative reciprocity can be switched to positive reciprocity given sufficient cooperation levels44,69–71.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [68]
In the citing paper
“More specifically, it has been observed that most people reciprocate trust when the initial act of trust is taken voluntarily68, e.g., as is the case with successful business organizations who foster a culture of trust by placing trust in others72–74.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [68]
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
Self-citationERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.1.166 · Cited by 5,399
Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302760193904 · Cited by 3,970
Langer, E. J. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311 · Cited by 3,909
Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4635.001.0001 · Cited by 3,428
A theory of sequential reciprocity
Dufwenberg, M. A., & Kirchsteiger, G. (2003) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2003.06.003 · Cited by 1,895
Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments
Levine, D. K. (1998) · Review of Economic Dynamics · doi:10.1006/redy.1998.0023 · Cited by 1,374
Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive ToolboxPreprint
Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,367
Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Reply
Hoffman, E. N., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. S. (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.1.340 · Cited by 1,146
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 658
Modeling Morality in 3‐D: Decision‐Making, Judgment, and Inference
Yu, H., Siegel, J. Z., & Crockett, M. J. (2018) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12382 · Cited by 65
On the Selection of Arbitrators
de Clippel, G., Eliaz, K., & Knight, B. G. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.11.3434 · Cited by 55
So What Exactly Is a “Coalition” Within an Organization? A Review and Organizing Framework
Mithani, M., & O'Brien, J. (2021) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320950433 · Cited by 46
Identity, Cooperation, and PunishmentPreprint
McLeish, K. N., & Oxoby, R. J. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.961379 · Cited by 54
Strong Reciprocity in Consumer Boycotts
Hahn, T., & Albert, N. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2870-3 · Cited by 53
Inequity aversion and trustees' reciprocity in the trust game
Emanuele, C. (2006) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2006.01.001 · Cited by 52
A Matter of Trust: From Social Preferences to the Strategic Adherence to Social Norms
Krueger, J. I., Massey, A. L., & DiDonato, T. E. (2008) · Negotiation and Conflict Management Research · doi:10.1111/j.1750-4716.2007.00003.x · Cited by 52
Cultural group selection, co evolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation (by Joseph Henrich)
Houser, D. E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. S. (2003) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(03)00108-2 · Cited by 52
Self-citationBig Five personality factors in the Trust Game
Müller, J., & Schwieren, C. (2019) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-019-00928-3 · Cited by 51
Natural and Strategic Generosity as Signals of Trustworthiness
Gambetta, D., & Przepiorka, W. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097533 · Cited by 51
Altman, M. (2004) · Review of Political Economy · doi:10.1080/0953825032000145445 · Cited by 54
Desmet, P. T. M., De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.027 · Cited by 50
National Identity, Pride, and Chauvinism—their Origins and Consequences for Globalization Attitudes
Huddy, L., & Ponte, A. D. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.003.0003 · Cited by 54
Trust and trustworthiness in networked exchange
Cassar, A., & Rigdon, M. L. (2010) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2010.04.003 · Cited by 48
Self-citationBellucci, G., Hahn, T., Deshpande, G., & Krueger, F. (2019) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-018-00654-3 · Cited by 55
Cox, J. C., Servátka, M., & Vadovič, R. (2016) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-016-9477-0 · Cited by 45
Attitudinal and Behavioral Measures of Trust: A New Comparison
Capra, C. M., Lanier, K., & Meer, S. (2007) · Cited by 49
Inequity and risk aversion in sequential public good games
Teyssier, S. (2010) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-010-9735-1 · Cited by 48
Desmet, P., Cremer, D. D., & van Dijk, E. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0791-3 · Cited by 49
Becchetti, L., & Conzo, P. (2010) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.022 · Cited by 47
Mechanism design and intentions
Bierbrauer, F., & Netzer, N. (2016) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2016.02.013 · Cited by 47
Li, P. P. (2015) · Nebraska Symposium on Motivation/The Nebraska symposium on motivation · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16151-8_3 · Cited by 46
Aimone, J. A., & Houser, D. E. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017725 · Cited by 50
Brownback, A., & Kuhn, M. A. (2019) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2019.07.003 · Cited by 40
Guala, F. (2006) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.5840/jphil2006103532 · Cited by 44
Coevolution of Trustful Buyers and Cooperative Sellers in the Trust Game
Masuda, N., & Nakamura, M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044169 · Cited by 50
Truthful reputation mechanisms for online systems
Jurca, R. (2007) · Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · doi:10.5075/epfl-thesis-3955 · Cited by 44
Go West Young Man: Self‐Selection and Endogenous Property Rights
Jaworski, T., & Wilson, B. J. (2012) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.4284/0038-4038-2011.249 · Cited by 43
Reciprocity and the Paradox of Trust in psychological game theory
Isoni, A., & Sugden, R. (2018) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.04.015 · Cited by 43
The Effects of Favor and Apology on Compliance
Goei, R., Roberto, A. J., Meyer, G. S., & Carlyle, K. E. (2007) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650207307896 · Cited by 43
Is Trust a Bad Investment?Preprint
Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I., & Piankov, N. E. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.478881 · Cited by 43
Vollan, B. (2010) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2010.10.003 · Cited by 42
Determinants and modulators of human social decisions
Terenzi, D., Liu, L., Bellucci, G., & Park, S. Q. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.06.041 · Cited by 42
Bayesian Model of Behaviour in Economic Games
Ray, D., Montague, P. R., Neuroimaging, H., King-Casas, B., & Dayan, P. (2008) · CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) · Cited by 42
(2015) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739418.001.0001 · Cited by 41
Lenard, P. T. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.003.0009 · Cited by 42
Soziologie und Ökonomie: Der Beitrag experimenteller Wirtschaftsforschung zur Sozialtheorie*
Diekmann, A. (2008) · KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1007/s11577-008-0026-5 · Cited by 41
Experimental comparison of direct, general, and indirect reciprocity
Herne, K., Lappalainen, O., & Kestilä‐Kekkonen, E. (2013) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2013.04.003 · Cited by 42
Firm-bank trusting relationship and discouraged borrowers
Tang, Y., Deng, C., & Moro, A. (2016) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-016-0194-z · Cited by 40
Choosing a partner for social exchange: Charitable giving as a signal of trustworthiness
Fehrler, S., & Przepiorka, W. (2016) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2016.06.006 · Cited by 40
Why Do People Reject Unintended Inequity? Responders' Rejection in a Truncated Ultimatum Game
Ohmura, Y., & Yamagishi, T. (2005) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.96.2.533-541 · Cited by 39
Norms and the Flexibility of Moral Action
FeldmanHall, O., Son, J.-Y., & Heffner, J. (2018) · Personality Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/pen.2018.13 · Cited by 39
Peacekeeping and the Enforcement of Intergroup Cooperation: Evidence from Mali
Nomikos, W. G. (2021) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/715246 · Cited by 38
The prefrontal cortex and (uniquely) human cooperation: a comparative perspective
Zoh, Y., Chang, S. W. C., & Crockett, M. J. (2021) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01092-5 · Cited by 40
Liberal Nationalism and Its Critics
Gustavsson, G., & Miller, D. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.001.0001 · Cited by 147
Kamas, L., & Preston, A. E. (2011) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.12.003 · Cited by 38
Li, J., & Tomasello, M. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.021 · Cited by 39
Adversarial vulnerabilities of human decision-making
Dezfouli, A., Nock, R., & Dayan, P. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2016921117 · Cited by 39
An analytical framework for evaluating peer-to-peer business models
Hughes, J., Lang, K. R., & Vragov, R. (2007) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2007.01.001 · Cited by 34
Gallego, J. (2014) · Journal of Theoretical Politics · doi:10.1177/0951629814533840 · Cited by 34
Information Feedback, Targeting, and Coordination: An Experimental Study
Hashim, M. J., Kannan, K., & Maximiano, S. (2017) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2016.0663 · Cited by 34
Two-Faced Morality: Distrust Promotes Divergent Moral Standards for the Self Versus Others
Weiß, A., Burgmer, P., & Mussweiler, T. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218775693 · Cited by 35
The Development of Theory of Mind and Positive and Negative Reciprocity in Preschool Children
Schug, J. R., Takagishi, H., Benech, C., & Okada, H. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00888 · Cited by 38
Keller, J., Mayo, R., Greifeneder, R., & Pfattheicher, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00254 · Cited by 32
Carry a big stick, or no stick at all
Calabuig, V., Fatás, E., Olcina, G., & Rodríguez-Lara, I. (2016) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2016.09.006 · Cited by 31
Begging Questions, Their Answers and Basic Cooperativity
Asher, N. M., & Quinley, J. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32090-3_2 · Cited by 30
Wei, Z., Zhao, Z., & Zheng, Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00952 · Cited by 30
A way forward? The impact of interculturalism on intergroup relations in culturally diverse nations
Yogeeswaran, K., Verkuyten, M., & Ealam, B. (2020) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220918651 · Cited by 35
Fair and Impartial Spectators in Experimental Economic Behavior
Smith, V. L. S., & Wilson, B. J. (2014) · Review of Behavioral Economics · doi:10.1561/105.00000001 · Cited by 30
Self-citationParkinson Patients’ Initial Trust in Avatars: Theory and Evidence
Javor, A., Ransmayr, G. N., Struhal, W., & Riedl, R. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165998 · Cited by 33
Thepassé composéin Old French and Modern French: evolution or revolution?
Caudal, P. (2015) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739418.003.0009 · Cited by 29
Monetary incentives versus class credit: Evidence from a large classroom trust experiment
Luccasen, R. A., & Thomas, M. K. (2014) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2014.02.012 · Cited by 29
Field study of charitable giving reveals that reciprocity decays over time
Chuan, A., Kessler, J. B., & Milkman, K. L. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1708293115 · Cited by 29
Apparent health encourages reciprocity
Krupp, D. B., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2011) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.10.001 · Cited by 29
Intention-based reciprocity and signaling of intentions
Toussaert, S. (2017) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.03.001 · Cited by 28
Commitment problems in conflict resolution
Kimbrough, E. O., Rubin, J., Sheremeta, R. M., & Shields, T. W. (2015) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.01.005 · Cited by 28
Opportunistic Behaviour and Trust: Experimental Results from Broccoli Farmers in Ecuador
Granja, C. R., & Wollni, M. (2018) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12271 · Cited by 27
On the Relative Strengths of Altruism and Fairness
Tan, J. H. W., & Bolle, F. (2006) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-005-4752-0 · Cited by 27
Adam Smith: From Propriety andSentimentsto Property andWealth
Smith, V. L. S. (2013) · Forum for Social Economics · doi:10.1080/07360932.2013.798241 · Cited by 26
Self-citationWu, H., Fung, B. J., & Mobbs, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.791835 · Cited by 30
Trust responsiveness. On the dynamics of fiduciary interactions
Pelligra, V. (2010) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2010.02.002 · Cited by 26
How to be kind? Outcomes versus intentions as determinants of fairness
Stanca, L. M. (2009) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2009.09.013 · Cited by 26
Models of decision-making and the coevolution of social preferences
Henrich, J., Boyd, R. T., Bowles, S., Camerer, C. F., Fehr, E., Gintis, H. M., McElreath, R. L., Alvard, M., Barr, A. M., Ensminger, J., et al. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05460148 · Cited by 26
THREE‐PLAYER TRUST GAME WITH INSIDER COMMUNICATION
Sheremeta, R. M., & Zhang, J. (2013) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.12018 · Cited by 25
Does competition foster trust? The role of tournament incentives
Keck, S., & Karelaia, N. (2011) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9297-1 · Cited by 25
Colors and Trust: The Influence of User Interface Design on Trust and Reciprocity
Hawlitschek, F., Jansen, L.-E., Lux, E., Teubner, T., & Weinhardt, C. (2016) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2016.80 · Cited by 25
Does strategic kindness crowd out prosocial behavior?
Johnsen, Å. A., & Kvaløy, O. (2016) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2016.09.016 · Cited by 25
The neural computation of human prosocial choices in complex motivational states
Saulin, A., Horn, U., Lotze, M., Kaiser, J., & Hein, G. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118827 · Cited by 25
Predictable and predictive emotions: explaining cheap signals and trust re-extension
Schniter, E., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2014) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00401 · Cited by 24
Influence of indirect information on interpersonal trust despite direct information.
Zarolia, P., Max Weisbuch, A., & Kateri Mcrae, A. (2016) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000074 · Cited by 24
Multiple motives of pro-social behavior: evidence from the solidarity game
Bolle, F., Breitmoser, Y., Heimel, J., & Vogel, C. (2011) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-011-9285-0 · Cited by 24
Culture and Patterns of Reciprocity: The Role of Exchange Type, Regulatory Focus, and Emotions
Deng, Y., Wang, C. S., Aime, F., Wang, L., Sivanathan, N., & Kim, Y. C. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167220913694 · Cited by 29
Playing the trust game with other people’s money
Kvaløy, O., & Luzuriaga, M. (2013) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-013-9386-4 · Cited by 23
Perceived Motives and Reciprocity
Orhun, A. Y. (2017) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2018.01.002 · Cited by 23
Evolution of tag-mediated altruistic behavior in one-shot encounters on large-scale complex networks
Hadzibeganovic, T., Lima, F. W. S., & Stauffer, D. (2012) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.05.020 · Cited by 21
Leader’s dilemma game: An experimental design for cyber insider threat research
Ho, S. M., & Warkentin, M. E. (2015) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-015-9599-5 · Cited by 22
Political Science and Beyond: Presidential Address to the American Political Science Association
Axelrod, R. (2008) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s153759270808002x · Cited by 22
James Andreoni, A., & Sanchez, A. (2014) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w20649 · Cited by 21
Rebitzer, J. B., & Taylor, L. J. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1659700 · Cited by 22
Time talk in narrative discourse: evidence from child and adult language acquisition
Hickmann, M., & Hendriks, H. (2015) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739418.003.0005 · Cited by 21
The Coherence of Liberal Nationalism
Miller, D. E. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.003.0002 · Cited by 22
Modelling trust evolution within small business lending relationships
Tang, Y., Moro, A., Sozzo, S., & Li, Z. (2018) · Financial Innovation · doi:10.1186/s40854-018-0105-1 · Cited by 21
What Can the Big Five Personality Factors Contribute to Explain Small-Scale Economic Behavior?Preprint
Müller, J., & Schwieren, C. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2029016 · Cited by 21
Trust and trustworthiness after negative random shocks
Bejarano, H. D., Gillet, J., & Rodríguez-Lara, I. (2021) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2021.102422 · Cited by 21
Forbes, C. E., Leitner, J. B., Duran, K. A., Magerman, A. B., Schmader, T., & Allen, J. J. B. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsu145 · Cited by 21
Option to cooperate increases women's competitiveness and closes the gender gap
Cassar, A., & Rigdon, M. (2021) · Evolution and human behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.06.001 · Cited by 18
Self-citationEssays on Social Preferences and Beliefs in Non-Embedded Social Dilemmas
Aksoy, O. (2013) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 20
The Non Cooperative Basis of Implicatures
Asher, N. M. (2014) · Studies in linguistics and philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8813-7_2 · Cited by 19
Jia, L., Song, L. J., Li, C., Cui, R., & Chen, Y. (2007) · Frontiers of Business Research in China · doi:10.1007/s11782-007-0033-9 · Cited by 20
Cooperation in Single Play, Two-Person Extensive form Games between Anonymously Matched Players
McCabe, K., Rigdon, M. L., & Smith, V. L. S. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-5196-3_3 · Cited by 19
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McCabe, K. A., Rigdon, M. L., & Smith, V. L.
- Affiliations
- George Mason University (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rigdon, Mary L.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 267-275
- ISSN
- 0167-2681 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107651934
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 70.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
- Keywords
- positive reciprocity, trust game, intention attribution, bargaining
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review