The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Our novel alternative to punishment builds on the reciprocal nature of the trust—the fact that people reciprocate voluntary trust68—as well as the conditional nature of human cooperation—the fact that negative reciprocity can be switched to positive reciprocity given sufficient cooperation levels44,69–71.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [68]
In the citing paper
“More specifically, it has been observed that most people reciprocate trust when the initial act of trust is taken voluntarily68, e.g., as is the case with successful business organizations who foster a culture of trust by placing trust in others72–74.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [68]
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
Self-citationERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.1.166 · Cited by 5,399
Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302760193904 · Cited by 3,970
Langer, E. J. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311 · Cited by 3,909
Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4635.001.0001 · Cited by 3,428
A theory of sequential reciprocity
Dufwenberg, M. A., & Kirchsteiger, G. (2003) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2003.06.003 · Cited by 1,895
Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments
Levine, D. K. (1998) · Review of Economic Dynamics · doi:10.1006/redy.1998.0023 · Cited by 1,374
Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive ToolboxPreprint
Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,367
Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Reply
Hoffman, E. N., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. S. (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.1.340 · Cited by 1,146
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 658
Singh, R. (2021) · International Journal of Emerging Markets · doi:10.1108/ijoem-04-2020-0391 · Cited by 7
The Value of Bad Ratings: An Experiment on the Impact of Distortions in Reputation Systems
Keser, C., & Späth, M. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2021.101782 · Cited by 7
Electronic Market Design Principles in the Context of Peer-to-Peer Filesharing Systems
Hughes, J., Lang, K. R., & Vragov, R. (2005) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 7
Social Identity and Reciprocity in Online Gift Giving Networks
Teubner, T., Hawlitschek, F., Adam, M. T. P., & Weinhardt, C. (2013) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2013.489 · Cited by 7
On the temporal orientation of intensional subjunctives in Spanish
Laça, B. (2015) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739418.003.0002 · Cited by 7
Applying 'Theory of Mind': Theory and Experiments
Kimbrough, E. O., Robalino, N., & Robson, A. J. (2016) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2017.10.008 · Cited by 7
Chung, E. (2021) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.12010257 · Cited by 8
Do you reward and punish in the way you think others expect you to?
Al‐Ubaydli, O., & Lee, M. S. (2012) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2012.02.002 · Cited by 7
Wealth is Associated with Lower Anxiety in a Sample of Lebanese Students
Abdel‐Khalek, A. M., & Yahfoufi, N. (2005) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.96.2.542-544 · Cited by 7
When households stop logging — Evidence for household adaptation from East Kalimantan
Smajgl, A., & Bohensky, E. L. (2012) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.01.013 · Cited by 7
Can Competition Spoil Reciprocity? - A Laboratory ExperimentPreprint
Bauernschuster, S., Falck, O., & Grosse, N. D. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1545713 · Cited by 7
Structural Identification of Social Preferences: Heterogeneity Matters for IncentivesPreprint
Echeverry, D., Figueroa, M. C., & Polanía-Reyes, S. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2634244 · Cited by 7
Sharing, social norms, and social distance: Experimental evidence from Russia and Western Alaska
Howe, E. L., Murphy, J. J., Gerkey, D., Stoddard, O. B., & West, C. T. (2023) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2023.07.026 · Cited by 7
Trening współpracy/rywalizacji jako forma wpływu na zachowanie ludzi w dwuosobowej grze zaufania
Zaleśkiewicz, T., & Hełka, A. (2007) · Decyzje · Cited by 6
Durant, T. C., WEINTRAUB, M. I., Houser, D. E., & Li, S. (2018) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343318765918 · Cited by 6
Nonlinear pricing under inequity aversion
Destan, C. G., & Yılmaz, M. (2019) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.11.013 · Cited by 6
Argumentative Contexts of National Identity Definition
Pehrson, S. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.003.0008 · Cited by 7
Does trust break even? A trust-game experiment with negative endowments
Füllbrunn, S., & Vyrastekova, J. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2023.101982 · Cited by 6
Milosav, Ð., & Nistotskaya, M. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100901 · Cited by 7
Does attachment to money affect reciprocity behaviour?
Malcman, M., Rosenboim, M., & Shavit, T. (2014) · Applied Economics Letters · doi:10.1080/13504851.2014.937028 · Cited by 6
ON MUTUAL BENEFIT AND SACRIFICE: A COMMENT ON BRUNI AND SUGDEN'S ‘FRATERNITY’
Gui, B. (2009) · Economics and Philosophy · doi:10.1017/s0266267109990046 · Cited by 6
A Formal Derivation of Composite Trust
Muller, T., & Schweitzer, P. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37119-6_9 · Cited by 6
Subjectivity and Free Indirect Discourse
(2015) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739418.003.0012 · Cited by 6
Plausible Deniability and Cooperation in Trust Games
Gillies, A. S., & Rigdon, M. L. (2019) · Review of Behavioral Economics · doi:10.1561/105.00000103 · Cited by 6
Self-citationCountry Stereotypes, Initial Trust, and Cooperation in Global Software Development Teams
Wang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE) · doi:10.1109/icgse.2019.00036 · Cited by 6
Kimbrough, E. O. (2022) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1529-213420220000026003 · Cited by 6
Take a chance: Trust-building across identity groups
Herrera, Y. M., & Kydd, A. H. (2022) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/00223433211058588 · Cited by 6
Trust Games as a Model for Requests
Quinley, J. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31467-4_15 · Cited by 6
Does Monitoring Reduce the Agent’s Preference for Honesty?
Laird, B. K., & Bailey, C. D. (2016) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1574-076520160000020003 · Cited by 6
La sphère marchande comme outil de résistance à la mondialisation : le cas du marché des colas
Robert-Demontrond, P., Joyeau, A., & Bougeard-Delfosse, C. (2010) · Management international · doi:10.7202/044659ar · Cited by 6
Intermediation and discrimination in an investment game: An experimental study
Cochard, F., Flage, A., & Peterlé, E. (2019) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.10.007 · Cited by 6
No effects of synchronicity in online social dilemma experiments: A registered report
Evans, A. M., Kogler, C., & Sleegers, W. W. A. (2021) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500008007 · Cited by 5
Bellemare, C., & Kröger, S. (2003) · edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) · doi:10.18452/3604 · Cited by 6
Creditworthiness as a signal of trustworthinessPreprint
Becchetti, L., & Conzo, P. (2010) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 6
Interdisciplinary Trust Meta-AnalysisPreprint
Ebert, T. A. E. (2007) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.5282/ubm/epub.1388 · Cited by 6
Assigning Intentions when Actions are Unobservable: The Impact of Trembling in the Trust GamePreprint
Cox, J. C., & DECK, C. A. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.895717 · Cited by 6
Becchetti, L., & Conzo, P. (2009) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 6
Personal relationships of rural small businesses with community banks in times of crisis
Bednarik, Z., & Marshall, M. I. (2024) · Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development · doi:10.1108/jsbed-04-2023-0196 · Cited by 5
Callousness, exploitativeness, and tracking of cooperation incentives in the human default network
Allen, T. A., Hallquist, M. N., & Dombrovski, A. Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2307221121 · Cited by 4
Mifune, N., & Li, Y. (2018) · PSYCHOLOGIA · doi:10.2117/psysoc.2019-b008 · Cited by 5
Winter, F., & Kataria, M. (2020) · Rationality and Society · doi:10.1177/1043463120919380 · Cited by 4
Late Frontal Negativity Discriminates Outcomes and Intentions in Trust-Repayment Behavior
Aspé-Sánchez, M., Mengotti, P., Rumiati, R. I., Rodríguez‐Sickert, C., Ewer, J., & Billeke, P. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.532295 · Cited by 5
Fairley, K., Vyrastekova, J., Weitzel, U., & Sanfey, A. G. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119007 · Cited by 5
Video Game-Based Methodology for Business Research
Lawson, L. L., & Lawson, C. L. (2009) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878109334038 · Cited by 5
Puritan American Capitalists and Evolutionary Game Theory
Runciman, W. G. (2005) · Max Weber Studies · doi:10.15543/mws/2005/2/7 · Cited by 5
Avgeris, A., Kontogeorgos, A., & Sergaki, P. (2018) · International Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.20472/ss2018.7.1.002 · Cited by 5
Considerations of Mutual Exchange in Prosocial Decision-Making
Allidina, S., Arbuckle, N. L., & Cunningham, W. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01216 · Cited by 5
Gao, Q., & Zhou, Y. (2020) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2021.00178 · Cited by 5
Fang, H., Liao, C., Fu, Z., Tian, S., Luo, Y., Xu, P., & Krüeger, F. (2022) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac269 · Cited by 5
In transparency we trust an experimental study of reputation, transparency, and signaling
Borzino, N., Fatás, E., & Peterlé, E. (2023) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2023.102061 · Cited by 5
Do pet dogs reciprocate the receipt of food from familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics?
McGetrick, J., Fux, L., Schullern‐Schrattenhofen, J., Rault, J., & Range, F. (2024) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/eth.13430 · Cited by 5
Drouvelis, M., & Powdthavee, N. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2015.07.007 · Cited by 5
Why Do People Cooperate as Much as They Do?
Woodward, J. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812880.019 · Cited by 5
Une hybridation de l'économie et des neurosciences a-t-elle un sens ?
Bourgeois‐Gironde, S., & Schoonover, C. E. (2008) · Revue d économie politique · doi:10.3917/redp.181.0035 · Cited by 5
Eliciting Motives for Trust and Reciprocity by Attitudinal and Behavioural MeasuresPreprint
Farina, F., O'Higgins, S. N., & Sbriglia, P. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1158981 · Cited by 5
To Give or Not to Give? - Equity, Efficiency and Altruistic Behavior in a Survey-Based ExperimentPreprint
Pelligra, V., & Stanca, L. M. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1854395 · Cited by 5
Double Standards: Social Preferences and Moral BiasesPreprint
Croson, R. T. A., & Konow, J. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.980353 · Cited by 5
Trust‐Based Approaches to Safety and Productivity
Conchie, S. M., Woodcock, H. E., & Taylor, P. J. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118979013.ch6 · Cited by 5
The Effect of Holding Office on the Behavior of PoliticiansPreprint
Enemark, D. P., Gibson, C. C., McCubbins, M. D., & Zimmerman, B. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2247147 · Cited by 5
To Protect and To Serve: Enhancing the Efficiency of LAPD Recruiting
Lim, N., Matthies, C., Ridgeway, G. K., & Gifford, B. (2009) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e647672010-001 · Cited by 5
Inequity and Risk Aversion in Sequential Public Good GamesPreprint
Teyssier, S. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1477278 · Cited by 5
Punishing Deception and Rewarding HonestyPreprint
Wang, C. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1111631 · Cited by 4
Liberal Nationalism and the Challenge of Essentialism
Moore, M. R. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.003.0011 · Cited by 5
Sprigman, C. J., & Tontrup, S. W. (2024) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/jels.12391 · Cited by 4
The Non Cooperative Basis of Implicatures
Asher, N. M. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31262-5_3 · Cited by 4
Ethical Pluralism in Economics
Wight, J. B. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198793991.013.7 · Cited by 4
What Drives Gender Differences in Trust and Trustworthiness?
Mukherjee, S. (2020) · Public Finance Review · doi:10.1177/1091142120960801 · Cited by 4
Reciprocity and uncertainty: When do people forgive?
Gago, A. (2021) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2021.102362 · Cited by 4
National Attachment—Cohesive, Divisive, or Both?
Gustavsson, G. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.003.0004 · Cited by 6
Promise keeping and reliance damage
Sengupta, A., & Vanberg, C. (2022) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104344 · Cited by 4
Default Matters in Trust and Reciprocity
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, Y. H., & Krüeger, F. (2023) · Games · doi:10.3390/g14010008 · Cited by 4
Mansell, J. (2018) · Politics and the Life Sciences · doi:10.1017/pls.2017.29 · Cited by 4
Bellucci, G., & Dreher, J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108770880.011 · Cited by 4
Coleman's Hypothesis on trusting behaviour and a remark on meta‐studies
Bolle, F., & Kaehler, J. (2006) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/13501780601049061 · Cited by 4
Social science and neuroscience: how can they inform each other?
Stanca, L. (2011) · International Review of Economics · doi:10.1007/s12232-011-0133-x · Cited by 4
The Impact of Authority on Cooperation: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Systemic Trust
Mitkidis, P., Xygalatas, D., Buttrick, N. R., Porubanová, M., & Liénard, P. (2014) · Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology · doi:10.1007/s40750-014-0011-3 · Cited by 4
Preferences over consumption and status
Vostroknutov, A. (2012) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-011-9291-2 · Cited by 4
Reciprocal Loyalty and Union Mediation
Panos, G. A., & Theodossiou, I. (2013) · Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society · doi:10.1111/irel.12028 · Cited by 4
Free Indirect Discourse and the syntax of the left periphery
Giorgi, A. (2015) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739418.003.0011 · Cited by 4
An Experimental Study of Endogenous Discretionary Controls on Employee Effort
Douthit, J. D., Liu, J., Schwartz, S. T., & Young, R. A. (2022) · European Accounting Review · doi:10.1080/09638180.2022.2063151 · Cited by 4
The Dynamics of Trust from the Perspective of a Trust Game
Roszczyńska-Kurasińska, M., & Kacprzyk-Murawska, M. (2012) · Understanding complex systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31436-0_11 · Cited by 4
Kvaløy, O., Luzuriaga, M., & Olsen, T. E. (2017) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-017-9514-7 · Cited by 4
Strategic Delegation in Experimental Duopolies with Endogenous Incentive ContractsPreprint
Georgantzı́s, N., Manasakis, C., Mitrokostas, E., & Petrakis, E. (2008) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 4
An Experimental Study of Conventions and NormsPreprint
Guala, F., & Mittone, L. (2008) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 4
Trustworthy by ConventionPreprint
Bigoni, M., Bortolotti, S., Casari, M., & Gambetta, D. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2057607 · Cited by 4
The Evolution of 'Theory of Mind': Theory and ExperimentsPreprint
Kimbrough, E. O., Robalino, N., & Robson, A. J. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2320670 · Cited by 4
When Equality Trumps Reciprocity: Evidence from a Laboratory ExperimentPreprint
Xiao, E., & Bicchieri, C. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1129550 · Cited by 4
The neural circuitry of emotion-induced distortions of trustPreprint
Engelmann, J. B., Meyer, F., Ruff, C. C., & Fehr, E. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/129130 · Cited by 4
Quirin, M., Beckenkamp, M., & Kühl, J. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1135191 · Cited by 4
Empathy incites a stable prosocial decision bias
Saulin, A., Ma, Y., & Hein, G. (2024) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhae272 · Cited by 4
Tan, J. H. W., & Jayasekara, D. N. (2024) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12555 · Cited by 3
Naïve Responses to Kind Delegation
Eisenkopf, G., & Fischbacher, U. (2014) · Managerial and Decision Economics · doi:10.1002/mde.2688 · Cited by 3
Signaling trustworthiness with the choice of a prosocial project: Theory and experiment
Boulu-Reshef, B., Kuechle, G., & Rohland, L. M. (2018) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2023.102146 · Cited by 3
Intentions rather than money illusion – Why nominal changes induce real effects
Grundmann, S., Giamattei, M., & Lambsdorff, J. G. (2019) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.07.003 · Cited by 3
Bejarano, H. D., Gillet, J., & Rodríguez-Lara, I. (2025) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.1002/soej.12758 · Cited by 3
Socialisation, trust and reciprocity among young people
Migheli, M. (2012) · Zeitschrift für schweizerische Statistik und Volkswirtschaft/Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik/Swiss journal of economics and statistics · doi:10.1007/bf03399361 · Cited by 3
Weaving Space into the Web of Trust: An Asymmetric Spatial Trust Model for Social Networks.
Bishr, M. (2007) · Cited by 3
Farina, F., O’Higgins, N., & Sbriglia, P. (2009) · Research in Economics · doi:10.1016/j.rie.2009.09.003 · Cited by 3
An experiment in political trust
Rodet, C. S. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2015.04.005 · Cited by 3
A STRAWSON–LEWIS DEFENCE OF SOCIAL PREFERENCES
de Boer, J. (2012) · Economics and Philosophy · doi:10.1017/s0266267112000259 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- McCabe, K. A., Rigdon, M. L., & Smith, V. L.
- Affiliations
- George Mason University (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rigdon, Mary L.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 267-275
- ISSN
- 0167-2681 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107651934
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 70.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
- Keywords
- positive reciprocity, trust game, intention attribution, bargaining
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
