The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Our novel alternative to punishment builds on the reciprocal nature of the trust—the fact that people reciprocate voluntary trust68—as well as the conditional nature of human cooperation—the fact that negative reciprocity can be switched to positive reciprocity given sufficient cooperation levels44,69–71.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [68]
In the citing paper
“More specifically, it has been observed that most people reciprocate trust when the initial act of trust is taken voluntarily68, e.g., as is the case with successful business organizations who foster a culture of trust by placing trust in others72–74.”
From Cooperation without punishment (2023) · cites this paper as [68]
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
Self-citationERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.1.166 · Cited by 5,399
Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302760193904 · Cited by 3,970
Langer, E. J. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311 · Cited by 3,909
Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4635.001.0001 · Cited by 3,428
A theory of sequential reciprocity
Dufwenberg, M. A., & Kirchsteiger, G. (2003) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2003.06.003 · Cited by 1,895
Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments
Levine, D. K. (1998) · Review of Economic Dynamics · doi:10.1006/redy.1998.0023 · Cited by 1,374
Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive ToolboxPreprint
Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,367
Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Reply
Hoffman, E. N., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. S. (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.1.340 · Cited by 1,146
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–658 of 658
Revenge and Gratitude in Trust-Based Encounters. Experimental Evidence on Process-Based Reciprocity
Vieth, M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-33536-6_7
Wootton, R. E. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0027868
Lincoln, J. R., & Gerlach, M. L. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511584442.008
Smith, V. L. S. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511754364.017
Self-citationNeuropsychological Level of Trust
(2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108770880.007
Neurocharacteristic Level of Trust
Krüeger, F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108770880.012 · Cited by 1
In a Transparent Gov We TrustPreprint
Borzino, N., Fatás, E., & Peterlé, E. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3978808
Kosfeld, M. (2022) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-022-09867-y
(2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511754364.022
Lincoln, J. R., & Gerlach, M. L. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511584442.001
Smith, V. L. S. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511754364.001
Self-citationFive Essays in Experimental Economics
Özgümüs, A. (2021) · doi:10.53846/goediss-8651
How to Foster Prosocial Behavior?
Späth, M. (2021) · eDiss (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) · doi:10.53846/goediss-8572
A research framework that examines work life factors of academics and transformational change
Comodromos, G. (2010) · Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University)
Introduction to the Special Issue in Honor of Professor Vernon Lomax Smith
DeSantis, M., & Porter, D. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1080/15427560.2022.2100388
Majerczyk, M. J., & Shi, B. (2022) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1475-148820220000025010
The Subjective Value based on the Intention and Outcome
Nihonsugi, T. (2015) · Journal of Japan Society of Kansei Engineering · doi:10.5057/kansei.13.3_129
(2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.002.0003
(2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.002.0007
(2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.002.0006
The Role of Social Esteem in the Trust Game With Preemptive SignalingPreprint
Boulu-Reshef, B., & Kuechle, G. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4477477
Cryptocurrencies: Experiments on Individual Attitudes and PerceptionsPreprint
Sylvester, S., & Möllerström, J. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4654615
Better-than-chance prediction of cooperative behaviour from first and second impressions
Schniter, E., & Shields, T. W. (2024) · Evolutionary Human Sciences · doi:10.1017/ehs.2023.30 · Cited by 1
Vertrauen – ein anwendungsorientierter und interdisziplinärer Überblick
Basel, J. S., Westmattelmann, D., Niemann, V., & Ade, V. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-65575-7_8
Li, Z., Yang, S., & Zhang, X. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4659646
Arnestad, M. N., Glambek, M., & Selart, M. (2024) · Frontiers in Behavioral Economics · doi:10.3389/frbhe.2024.1297601
Representation of Others' BeliefsPreprint
Qin, J., & Wu, H. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/4usbp
Do Lucky People Reciprocate More? The Effect of Outcome Bias on Trustworthiness
Muchtar, P. A. (2024) · Studies in Microeconomics · doi:10.1177/23210222241235045
Arnestad, M. N., Glambek, M., & Selart, M. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4776446
Mao, Y., Di, X., & Han, X. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4829585
Representation of others' beliefs
Qin, J., & Wu, H. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820480-1.00159-5
Jiang, F., Liu, L. X., & Kang, Y. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4904362
Mao, Y., Di, X., & Han, X. (2024) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112815 · Cited by 1
The effect of tailored reciprocity on information provision in an investigative interview
Weiher, L., Winters, C. L., Taylor, P. J., Luther, K., & Watson, S. J. (2024) · Journal of Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1108/jcp-01-2024-0004
The effect of control justification on employees’ in-role and extra-role behaviors
Cha, Y., & Wong‐On‐Wing, B. (2025) · Journal of Management Control · doi:10.1007/s00187-025-00394-9 · Cited by 3
Would you lie for me? Lying behavior in a principal-agent relationship
Bühren, C., Dannenberg, A., & Wiederhold, E. (2025) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2025.102869
Motivational Effects of Feeling TrustedPreprint
Abraham, D., & Krčál, O. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5870734
Smith, V. L. S. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511754364.021
Self-citationPositive reciprocity when motives are ambiguous
Müller‐Trede, J., & Rottenstreich, Y. (2025) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1017/eec.2025.10009
Trust and Reciprocity, Altruism, Cooperation, and Fairness: A Meta-AnalysisPreprint
Guo, Y., Wang, Y., & Wu, Y. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5391990
The Illusion of Trust in AI: Behavioural Differences Between Humans and Large Language Models
Hang, Y., Ling, Z., Liu, Q., He, X., & Wu, W. (2026) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/3628473
Maurer, C. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/cc36d7a0z420ez4ea7zb3f3z1197b60ffbd4
Learning to distrust: One trust experience changes the expected value of trust
Roberts, A. R., Levine, E. E., & Risen, J. L. (2026) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104930
The hidden cost of insurance on cooperationPreprint
Zeelenberg, M., & de Calseyde, P. P. F. M. V. (2024) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Taking algorithmic (vs. human) advice reveals different goals to othersPreprint
Bahník, Š., Vranka, M. A., Efendić, E., & de Calseyde, P. P. F. M. V. (2024) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Expected cooperation in algorithms: evidence from the Stag Hunt game
Zhang, Y., Mulder, M., Kenemans, J. L., Aarts, H., & Liefooghe, B. (2026) · Journal of Psychology and AI · doi:10.1080/29974100.2026.2666266
The empathy game: can trust be supported without positive material reciprocity?
Banerjee, S., Guerrero, F., & Pingle, M. (2026) · Review of Behavioral Economics · doi:10.1108/rbe-12-2024-1005
Expected reciprocity and cooperative trust in interactions,with algorithms versus humansPreprint
Zhang, Y., Mulder, M., Kenemans, J. L., Aarts, H., Somai, M., & Liefooghe, B. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7610121
Does Instrumental Reciprocity Crowd Out Prosocial Behavior?Preprint
Johnsen, Å. A., & Kvaløy, O. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2532920
Unequal Incentives and Perceived Fairness in Groups
Eisenkopf, G. (2018) · Games · doi:10.3390/g9030071
Evolution of Trust in Economic Systems
Bossomaier, T. R. J., Harré, M., & Thompson, J. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-88-470-1083-3_1
Metadata
- Authors
- McCabe, K. A., Rigdon, M. L., & Smith, V. L.
- Affiliations
- George Mason University (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rigdon, Mary L.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 267-275
- ISSN
- 0167-2681 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107651934
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 70.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
- Keywords
- positive reciprocity, trust game, intention attribution, bargaining
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review