Cited by 39Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Narcissistic Personality Disorder: A Validity Study and Comparison to Borderline Personality Disorder

Plakun, Eric M.·1989·Psychiatric Clinics of North America

Abstract

Seventeen former inpatients with NPD were retrospectively compared to 19 patients with schizophrenia, 26 with MAD and 33 patients with BPD in terms of longitudinal course and outcome, exploring the validity of the NPD diagnosis. Two illustrative cases were presented. Results suggest that NPD is a valid diagnostic entity, more distinct from schizophrenia than MAD. NPD probably differs from BPD in terms of equal sex distribution in NPD; poor social functioning, especially in the low level of satisfaction with heterosexual relationships in NPD at follow-up; more rehospitalization in NPD; probably poorer global functioning in NPD at admission; and probably poorer overall follow-up functioning in NPD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0193-953x(18)30417-9

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have documented the persistence of narcissistic pathology, even among patients who improve symptomatically.

    “Overall, studies (Table 2) (76–83) have documented the persistence of narcissistic pathology, even among patients who improve symptomatically.”
  • Comorbid conditions are likely contributors to the persistence of functional impairment, especially challenges in interpersonal functioning and romantic relationships.

    “These comorbid conditions are likely contributors to the persistence of functional impairment (i.e., unrelenting challenges in interpersonal functioning, especially in the romantic arena) (76).”
  • In Plakun (1989), a retrospective 17-year study of patients with narcissistic personality disorder found poor functioning and poor romantic relationships.

    “Plakun, 1989 ( 76 ) Mean=24.5, SD=7.7 48:52 Retrospective/17 13.6 Poor functioning, poor romantic relationships”

    From Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as Plakun, 1989 ( 76 )

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plakun, E. M.
Affiliations
Austen Riggs Center (US)
Corresponding author
Plakun, Eric M.
Venue
Psychiatric Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
603-620
ISSN
0193-953X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131093415
Cited by
39
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
narcissistic personality disorder, borderline personality disorder, diagnostic validity, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, longitudinal outcomes, hospital readmission, social functioning, relationship satisfaction, sex distribution
MeSH terms
Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Narcissism, Patient Readmission, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychoanalytic Therapy, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Suicide, Attempted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review