Cited by 28Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Clinical Characteristics of Comorbid Narcissistic Personality Disorder in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder

Hörz-Sagstetter, Susanne, Diamond, Diana, Clarkin, John F., Levy, Kenneth N., Rentrop, Michael, Fischer-Kern, Melitta, Cain, Nicole M., Doering, Stephan·2018·Journal of Personality Disorders

Abstract

This study examines psychopathology and clinical characteristics of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and comorbid narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) from two international randomized controlled trials. From a combined sample of 188 patients with BPD, 25 also fulfilled criteria for a comorbid diagnosis of NPD according to DSM-IV. The BPD patients with comorbid NPD, compared to the BPD patients without comorbid NPD, showed significantly more BPD criteria (M = 7.44 vs. M = 6.55, p < .001), fulfilled more criteria of comorbid histrionic (M = 3.84 vs. M = 1.98, p < .001), paranoid (M = 3.12 vs. M = 2.27, p = .014), and schizotypal (M = 1.64 vs. M = 1.02, p = .018) personality disorders, and were more likely to meet criteria for full histrionic PD diagnosis (44.0% vs. 14.2%, p < .001). The BPD-NPD group also reported significantly fewer psychiatric hospitalizations in the previous year (M = 0.40 vs. M = 0.82, p = .019) and fewer axis I disorders (M = 2.68 vs. M = 3.75, p = .033). No differences could be found in general functioning, self-harming behavior, and suicide attempts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/pedi_2017_31_306

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grandiosity predisposes individuals to respond with antagonism/hostility and reduced reality testing when the grandiose self is threatened.

    “This grandiosity, however, “predisposes [these individuals] to respond with antagonism/hostility and reduced reality testing when the grandiose self is threatened” (p.571).”

    From Living with pathological narcissism: a qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [28]

  • Grandiosity, as reflected in the DSM-5, has been argued to be a key feature of pathological narcissism that distinguishes it from other disorders.

    “Grandiosity, as reflected in the DSM-5, has been argued to be a key feature of pathological narcissism that distinguishes it from other disorders [26, 28].”

    From Living with pathological narcissism: a qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [28]

  • Grandiosity is a narcissistic 'specific' factor that distinguishes it from other disorders (e.g. BPD).

    “Hörz-Sagstetter, Diamond [28] proposes grandiosity as a narcissistic ‘specific’ factor that distinguishes it from other disorders (e.g. BPD).”

    From Living with pathological narcissism: a qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [28]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Caligor E., 2007, Handbook of dynamic psychotherapy for highe- level personality pathology.
  2. First M. B., 1996, User's Guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I – Research Version (SCID-1, Version 2.0.)
  3. Fydrich T., 1997, Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV Achse II: Persönlichkeitsstörungen
  4. Gersten S. P., 1991, Psychiatric Times, 8, 25
  5. Levy K. N., 1998, Cornell Interview for Suicidal and Self-Harming Behavior – Self Report (CISSB).
  6. Levy K. N., 1998, Cornell Revised Treatment History Inventory (CRTHI).
  7. Linehan M., 1989, Parasuicide history interview: Comprehensive assessment of parasuicidal behavior.
  8. Loranger A. W., 1999, International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE): DSM-IV and ICD-10 Modules.
  9. Stone M. H., 1990, The fate of borderline patients: Successful outcome and practice.
  10. Wittchen H. U., 1997, SKID-I. Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV. Achse I: Psychische Störungen [Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II: Mental Disorders]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hörz-Sagstetter, S., Diamond, D., Clarkin, J. F., Levy, K. N., Rentrop, M., Fischer-Kern, M., Cain, N. M., & Doering, S.
Affiliations
  • Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Germany.
  • City University of New York (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
  • Long Island University (US)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Venue
Journal of Personality Disorders
Published
2018-08
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
562-575
ISSN
0885-579X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2741917268
Cited by
28
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, narcissistic personality disorder, comorbidities, personality disorders, histrionic personality disorder, paranoid personality disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, psychiatric hospitalization, self-harm, suicide attempts, clinical features
MeSH terms
Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Disorders, Suicide, Attempted, Comorbidity, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review