CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 226Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Facing DSM-V

Ronningstam, Elsa·2009·Psychiatric Annals
DOI 10.3928/00485713-20090301-09
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/00485713-20090301-09

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These results support the notion that an individual's narcissism presentation may fluctuate over time and that vulnerable and grandiose presentations are inter-related and oscillating.

    “As such, these results support the notion that an individual’s narcissism presentation may fluctuate over time [20, 21] and that vulnerable and grandiose presentations are inter-related and oscillating [9, 19].”

    From Living with pathological narcissism: a qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [19]

  • Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism may reflect both sides of a narcissistic 'coin' that may be regularly oscillating, inter-related and state dependent.

    “While the differences in presentation between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism appear manifest, it has been argued that they reflect both sides of a narcissistic ‘coin’ [9] that may be regularly oscillating, inter-related and state dependent [6, 18–22].”

    From Living with pathological narcissism: a qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [19]

  • The study found many grandiose features that have been validated through empirical research.

    “We found many grandiose features that have been validated through empirical research [2, 3, 19].”

    From Living with pathological narcissism: a qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [19]

  • Several scholars published reviews documenting their support for continued inclusion of NPD in the DSM.

    “Notably, in the buildup to the release of DSM-5, several scholars published reviews of the state of the literature on narcissism and NPD and documented their support for its continued inclusion in the DSM (e.g., Levy et al. 2007;Pincus & Lukowitsky 2010;Ronningstam 2009Ronningstam , 2011)).”

    From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Ronningstam 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 101 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Ronningstam, E.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Ronningstam, Elsa
ORCID
Ronningstam, Elsa
Venue
Psychiatric Annals
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
2009-03
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
111-121
ISSN
  • 0048-5713 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2456
DOI
10.3928/00485713-20090301-09
OpenAlex
W2037689350
Cited by
226
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
15.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychiatric Annals (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
narcissistic personality disorder, DSM-5, personality disorders, diagnostic criteria, personality disorder classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review