CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 191Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive therapy of depression

Hamilton, Kate E, Dobson, Keith S·2002·Clinical Psychology Review
DOI 10.1016/s0272-7358(02)00106-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This review examines the role of patient predictors of outcome in cognitive therapy of depression. Studies that meet eligibility criteria are reviewed for demonstrated linkage between various predictors (i.e., pretreatment severity, historical features, demographic predictors, dysfunctional attitudes and other cognitive features, and treatment acceptability) and outcome, and several effects are found. Notably, high pretreatment severity scores are associated with poorer response to cognitive therapy, as are high chronicity, younger age at onset, an increased number of previous episodes, and marital status. High pretreatment levels of dysfunctional attitudes and certain beliefs about the nature of depression were also found to predict differential response to cognitive therapy of depression. Limitations of the research and directions for further investigations of patient predictors of outcome in cognitive therapy of depression are provided.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0272-7358(02)00106-x

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Dimidjian, S., & Dobson, K.S. (in press). Process of change in cognitive therapy. In: Reinecke, M. A., & Clark, D. A. (Eds.), Cognitive therapy of emotional and behavioral disorders: clinical and conceptual horizons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Kemp, 1991, Effects of brief cognitive–behavioral group psychotherapy on older persons with and without disabling illness, Behavior, Health, and Aging, 2, 21
  3. Reich, 1995, Cormorbidity of panic and major depressive disorder, Journal of Psychiatric Research, 20, 23
  4. Weissman, 1979, The dysfunctional attitudes scale: a validation study (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania), Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 1389B

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 191

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hamilton, K. E., & Dobson, K. S.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Hamilton, Kate E
ORCID
Dobson, Keith S
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-07
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
875-893
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0272-7358(02)00106-x
OpenAlex
W102691765
Cited by
191
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive therapy, depression, predictors of treatment outcome, pretreatment severity, chronicity of depression, age of onset, marital status, dysfunctional attitudes, treatment acceptability
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Attitude, Cognition, Demography, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Probability, Severity of Illness Index, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review