Cited by 252Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major Depression

Relapse after cognitive behavior therapy of depression: potential implications for longer courses of treatment

Michael E. Thase, Anne D. Simons, John E. McGeary, John F. Cahalane, Carol Hughes, T Harden, Edward S. Friedman·1992·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors studied the risk of relapse among depressed patients after cognitive behavior therapy in order to document the need and potential indications for longer-term models of treatment. METHOD: Forty-eight patients with major depression who responded during a 16-week course of cognitive behavior therapy entered a 1-year prospective follow-up study, as did two patients who received 20 weeks of therapy. Standardized, independent clinical assessments were completed 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment. Relapse was defined as, at minimum, a 2-week period in which the subject met the DSM-III-R criteria for major depression and had a Hamilton depression scale score of 15 or more. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (32%) relapsed during the 1-year follow-up. Correlates of relapse included a history of depressive episodes, higher levels of depressive symptoms and dysfunctional attitudes, slower response to therapy, and being unmarried. Patients who fully recovered during therapy (Hamilton depression score of 6 or less for 8 weeks or more) were at significantly lower risk for relapse than those who partially recovered (9% and 52%, respectively). Slower response to therapy, unmarried status, and high residual scores on the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale were independently and additively related to increased risk of relapse. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide further evidence of a relation between residual symptoms and relapse after cessation of active treatment. The authors strongly recommend that models of longer-term psychotherapy be developed for depressed patients who do not recover fully during time-limited cognitive behavior therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.149.8.1046

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thase, M. E., Simons, A. D., McGeary, J. E., Cahalane, J. F., Hughes, C., Harden, T., & Friedman, E. S.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1992-08-01
Volume
149
Issue
8
Pages
1046-1052
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W80099719
Cited by
252
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-41884, R01MH041884, MH30915)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
relapse, cognitive behavioral therapy, major depressive disorder, long-term psychotherapy, treatment response, residual symptoms, dysfunctional attitudes, marital status, recurrence risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care, Attitude to Health, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Single Person, Time Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review