Cited by 39Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Patterns of impaired verbal, spatial, and object working memory after thalamic lesions

Kubat-Silman, Alycia K, Dagenbach, Dale, Absher, John R·2002·Brain and Cognition

Abstract

Working memory processes in six individuals with isolated thalamic lesions were assessed. Participants were given a verbal, spatial, and object n-back task, each at three levels of task load (1-back, 2-back, and 3-back). Relative to a control group, the patients were impaired on the verbal and spatial n-back tasks, and possibly on the object n-back task as well. None of the patients showed impaired short-term memory as measured by digit span. Group differences on trials measuring matching, sequencing, and inhibitory abilities were consistent with other reports suggesting that thalamic lesions may impair the operation of executive processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0278-2626(02)00502-x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The amygdala, thalamus, striatum, and corpus callosum have been implicated in performance on the N-Back previously.

    “These regions have been implicated in performance on the N‐Back previously (Dahlin, Neely, Larsson, Bäckman, & Nyberg, 2008; Kubat‐Silman, Dagenbach, & Absher, 2002; Schaefer et al., 2006; Takeuchi et al., 2010; Zou, Hong, Wang, Gao, & Yang, 2011).”

    From Brain structure, working memory and response inhibition in childhood leukemia survivors (2017) · cites this paper as Kubat-Silman et al., 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kubat-Silman, A. K., Dagenbach, D., & Absher, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
  • Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US)
Corresponding author
Kubat-Silman, Alycia K
Venue
Brain and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-11
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
178-193
ISSN
0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071760438
Cited by
39
References
42
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
thalamic lesions, working memory, verbal working memory, spatial working memory, object working memory, n-back task, workload, short-term memory, digit span, executive function, inhibitory control, matching, sequencing
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aphasia, Cerebral Infarction, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Neuropsychological Tests, Perceptual Disorders, Severity of Illness Index, Space Perception, Thalamus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review