Cited by 43Connexins and lens biologyCircadian rhythm and melatoninEstrogen and related hormone effects

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of estrogen and progesterone on the expression of connexin-36 mRNA in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of female rats

Abstract

To determine the effects of ovarian steroid hormones on gap junction communication in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), we examined the effects of estrogen and/or progesterone on the expression of connexin-36 mRNA in the SCN and cerebral cortex (CX) of female rats. Ovariectomized adult rats were injected with 20 microg 17beta-Estradiol or sesame oil 48 h before sacrifice and further injected with 1.5 mg progesterone or sesame oil 24 h before sacrifice. Northern blot revealed that estrogen significantly increased the expression of connexin-36 mRNA in the SCN and this increase was inhibited by progesterone. On the other hand, the connexin-36 mRNA level in the CX was not affected by estrogen or progesterone. These results suggest that the gap junction with connexin-36 in the SCN is specifically regulated by ovarian steroid hormones of female rats.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02022-5

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Estrogen enhances electrical intercellular coupling by increasing the number of gap junctions in the SCN, in a manner opposed by progesterone.

    “Estrogen enhances electrical intercellular coupling by increasing the number of gap junctions in the SCN, [175, 176] in a manner that is opposed by progesterone [176].”
  • Estrogen enhances electrical intercellular coupling by increasing the number of gap junctions in the SCN, in a manner opposed by progesterone.

    “Estrogen enhances electrical intercellular coupling by increasing the number of gap junctions in the SCN, [175, 176] in a manner that is opposed by progesterone [176].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shinohara, K., Funabashi, T., Nakamura, T. J., & Kimura, F.
Affiliations
  • Dokkyo University (JP)
  • Yokohama City University (JP)
Corresponding author
Shinohara, Kazuyuki
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-08
Volume
309
Issue
1
Pages
37-40
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014349217
Cited by
43
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connexins and lens biology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
estrogen, progesterone, connexin 36, suprachiasmatic nucleus, gap junctional intercellular communication, ovarian steroids, estradiol, cerebral cortex, mRNA expression, female rats
MeSH terms
Gap Junction delta-2 Protein, Animals, Biological Clocks, Cell Communication, Cerebral Cortex, Circadian Rhythm, Estrogens, Estrus, Eye Proteins, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Neurons, Progesterone, RNA, Messenger, Suprachiasmatic Nucleus, Rats, Wistar, Gap Junctions, Connexins, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review