Cited by 118Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPediatric Pain Management Techniques

The relation between pain beliefs, negative thoughts, and psychosocial functioning in chronic pain patients

Stroud, Michael W, Thorn, Beverly E, Jensen, Mark P, Boothby, Jennifer L·2000·Pain

Abstract

Cognitions and beliefs appear important in predicting adjustment to chronic pain. The current study examines how cognitions and beliefs are related to psychosocial functioning. One hundred and sixty-three chronic pain out-patients were assessed. Regression analyses were performed using scores on the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory and the Inventory of Negative Thoughts in Response to Pain as predictor variables and responses to the West Haven Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory as criterion variables. Pain cognitions and pain beliefs were correlated. After controlling for demographics, employment status and pain severity, pain beliefs and cognitions accounted for a significant amount of the variance in general activity, pain interference, and affective distress. Negative cognitions, particularly negative self-statements, were more predictive of outcome than pain beliefs. Although these data are correlational, they provide additional support for a biopsychosocial model of adjustment to chronic pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00226-2

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some forms of clinical pain may be caused by enhanced aversive valuation of pain, rather than resulting from dysregulation of nociceptive brain processes.

    “For example, some forms of clinical pain may be caused by enhanced aversive valuation of pain, rather than resulting from dysregulation of nociceptive brain processes (e.g., [92],[93]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stroud, M. W., Thorn, B. E., Jensen, M. P., & Boothby, J. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
Corresponding author
Thorn, Beverly E
Venue
Pain
Published
2000-02-01
Volume
84
Issue
2
Pages
347-352
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040817121
Cited by
118
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
chronic pain, pain beliefs, pain-related cognitions, negative thinking, negative self-statements, psychosocial functioning, pain interference, emotional distress, general activity, biopsychosocial model
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review