Cited by 1,091Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressFood and Agricultural Sciences

An investigation of antioxidant capacity of fruits in Singapore markets

Leong, L.P, Shui, G·2002·Food Chemistry

Abstract

The antioxidant capacity of a group of fruits obtained in the Singapore markets was investigated. A total of 27 fruit pulps were tested for their general antioxidant capacity based on their ability to scavenge 2,2'-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) free radical. The contribution of L-ascorbic acid (AA) to the total antioxidant activity of fruits was investigated by using RP-HPLC. The antioxidant capacity of the fruit pulp was measured by monitoring the change of absorbance of the free radical solution at 414 nm in the test reaction mixture following addition of the fruit extract, as compared with AA. The results were expressed as mg of AA equivalents per 100 g, i.e. the quantity of AA required to produce the same scavenging activity as the extract in 100 g of sample (L-ascorbic acid equivalent antioxidant capacity, AEAC). Total antioxidant capacities of AA acid, trolox, hydroquinone, pyrogallol and several fruits were also evaluated based on its ability to scavenge the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) radical. Results obtained were compared with those of ABTS assay. Every mol of AA, trolox or hydroquinone, was found to reduce about 2 mol of ABTS radical cation or DPPH radical. However, 4 mol of DPPH radical or 7 mol of ABTS radical cation were scavenged by every mol of pyrogallol. A good correlation of AEAC was observed between the two methods. Both methods have been recommended to be useful tools to evaluate antioxidant capacities of fruits. According to the AEAC value of binary extract solution of fruits in the ABTS model, ciku shows the highest antioxidant capacity, followed by strawberry, plum, star fruit, guava, seedless grape, salak, mangosteen, avocado, orange, solo papaya, mango, kiwi fruit, cempedak, pomelo, lemon, pineapple, apple, foot long papaya, rambutan, rambutan king, banana, coconut pulp, tomato, rockmelon, honeydew, watermelon and coconut water. The AA contribution to AEAC of fruits varied greatly among species, from 0.06% in ciku to 70.2% in rambutan.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0308-8146(01)00251-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coconut water had an ascorbic acid content of 0.7 mg/100 g.

    “Among 27 tropical fruits purchased in supermarkets and wholesale outlets in Singapore, coconut water had the lowest AEAC (L-ascorbic acid equivalent antioxidant capacity): 11.5 AEAC (mg•100 g -1 ) and an ascorbic acid (AA) content of 0.7 mg•100 g -1 [73].”

    From Coconut water uses, composition and properties: a review (2012) · cites this paper as [73]

  • Among 27 tropical fruits purchased in supermarkets and wholesale outlets in Singapore, coconut water had the lowest AEAC: 11.5 AEAC mg/100 g.

    “Among 27 tropical fruits purchased in supermarkets and wholesale outlets in Singapore, coconut water had the lowest AEAC (L-ascorbic acid equivalent antioxidant capacity): 11.5 AEAC (mg•100 g -1 ) and an ascorbic acid (AA) content of 0.7 mg•100 g -1 [73].”

    From Coconut water uses, composition and properties: a review (2012) · cites this paper as [73]

  • The coconut kernel had higher AEAC and ascorbic acid values than coconut water.

    “The coconut kernel had higher values than the coconut water.”

    From Coconut water uses, composition and properties: a review (2012) · cites this paper as [73]

  • The proportion of ascorbic acid in the AEAC of fruits varied greatly among species, from 0.06% in ciku to 70.2% in rambutan.

    “The proportion of ascorbic acid in the AEAC of fruits varied greatly among species, from 0.06% in ciku (Manilkara zapota) to 70.2% in rambutan; it was only 6.1% for coconut water.”

    From Coconut water uses, composition and properties: a review (2012) · cites this paper as [73]

  • The proportion of ascorbic acid in the AEAC was 6.1% for coconut water.

    “The proportion of ascorbic acid in the AEAC of fruits varied greatly among species, from 0.06% in ciku (Manilkara zapota) to 70.2% in rambutan; it was only 6.1% for coconut water.”

    From Coconut water uses, composition and properties: a review (2012) · cites this paper as [73]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leong, L. P., & Shui, G.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Leong, L.P
Venue
Food Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
76
Issue
1
Pages
69-75
ISSN
0308-8146 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987469049
Cited by
1,091
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 73 · 2012: 64
FWCI
9.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Funders
Rural Development Administration
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
antioxidant capacity, fruit pulp, ABTS radical scavenging, DPPH radical scavenging, vitamin C, Trolox, hydroquinone, pyrogallol, fruit extract

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review