The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Holonomic quantum computation
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, since the SU(2) gauge field description is valid for photons down to quantum scale, this approach might be applicable to the design of geometric gates for realizing non-Abelian holonomic quantum computation64,65 with photons.”
From Non-Abelian gauge field optics (2019) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“The Davies approach is based not on the highT limit, but rather on the physically plausible idea of weak coupling. This is natural and consistent with thermodynamics at all temperatures.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“In the Davies approach the Markov approximation is a consequence of weak coupling (and hence slow dynamics of the system in the interaction picture), and time coarse-graining, which leads to cancellation of the non-Markovian oscillating terms.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“The price we pay is the invalidity of this approach for timedependent Hamiltonians, except in the adiabatic case.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“More specifically, Davies' derivation does not invoke a flatness condition on G ( ω ) but is, of course, still subject to the KMS condition.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“Hence, while the Davies approach does not require the highT limit, it imposes severe restrictions on the speed of quantum gates.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Appearance of Gauge Structure in Simple Dynamical Systems
Wilczek, F., & Zee, A. (1984) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.2111 · Cited by 1,775
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.255 · Cited by 1,651
Geometry, Topology and Physics
Nakahara, M. (1990) · doi:10.1887/0750306068 · Cited by 1,620
Wilczek, F. A., & Shapere, A. D. (1989) · Advanced series in mathematical physics · doi:10.1142/0613 · Cited by 1,616
Steane, A. (1998) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/61/2/002 · Cited by 1,391
Two-bit gates are universal for quantum computation
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.51.1015 · Cited by 1,069
Almost Any Quantum Logic Gate is Universal
Lloyd, S. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.346 · Cited by 690
Universality in quantum computation
Deutsch, D. E., Barenco, A., & Ekert, A. (1995) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1995.0065 · Cited by 346
Hermitian vector bundles and the equidistribution of the zeroes of their holomorphic sections
Bott, R., & Chern, S.-S. (1965) · Acta Mathematica · doi:10.1007/bf02391818 · Cited by 294
Geometric phase, bundle classification, and group representation
Mostafazadeh, A. (1996) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.531457 · Cited by 16
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- E. Demler, S.C. Zhang, LANL e-print archive cond-mat/9805404. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 988
Kang, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, X., Song, J., Xia, Y., Miranowicz, A., Zheng, S., & Nori, F. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013233 · Cited by 75
Measurement scheme of the Berry phase in superconducting circuits
Möttönen, M., Pekola, J. P., Vartiainen, J. J., Brosco, V., & Hekking, F. W. J. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.214523 · Cited by 75
Realization of holonomic single-qubit operations
Toyoda, K., Uchida, K., Noguchi, A., Haze, S., & Urabe, S. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.052307 · Cited by 75
Experimental Realization of Robust Geometric Quantum Gates with Solid-State Spins
Huang, Y., Wu, Y., Wang, F., Hou, P., Wang, W.-B., Zhang, W.-Y., Lian, W., Liu, Y.-Q., Wang, H., Zhang, H.-Y., et al. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.010503 · Cited by 73
Zhang, P., Wang, Z. D., Sun, J. D., & Sun, C. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.042301 · Cited by 73
Liang, Z.-T., Yue, X.-X., Lv, Q.-X., Du, Y.-X., Huang, W., Yan, H., & Zhu, S.-L. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.040305 · Cited by 72
Geometric Phase with Nonunitary Evolution in the Presence of a Quantum Critical Bath
Cucchietti, F., Zhang, J.-F., Lombardo, F. C., Villar, P. I., & Laflamme, R. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.240406 · Cited by 71
Realization of efficient quantum gates with a superconducting qubit-qutrit circuit
Bækkegaard, T., Kristensen, L. B., Loft, N. J. S., Andersen, C. K., Petrosyan, D., & Zinner, N. T. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-49657-1 · Cited by 74
Universal Nonadiabatic Geometric Gates in Two-Qubit Decoherence-Free Subspaces
Xu, G., & Long, G. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep06814 · Cited by 70
Fault-Tolerant Holonomic Quantum Computation
Oreshkov, O., Brun, T. A., & Lidar, D. A. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.070502 · Cited by 70
Experimental realization of 1→2 asymmetric phase-covariant quantum cloning
Chen, H., Zhou, X., Suter, D., & Du, J. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.012317 · Cited by 69
Zheng, S., Yang, C.-P., & Nori, F. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.032313 · Cited by 69
Quantum computation via Floquet topological edge modes
Bomantara, R. W., & Gong, J. (2018) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.165421 · Cited by 69
Edet, C. O., & Ikot, A. N. (2021) · Journal of Low Temperature Physics · doi:10.1007/s10909-021-02577-9 · Cited by 68
Protecting geometric gates by dynamical decoupling
Xu, G., & Long, G. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.022323 · Cited by 68
Du, J., Zou, P., & Wang, Z. D. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.020302 · Cited by 67
Mixed State Geometric Phases, Entangled Systems, and Local Unitary Transformations
Ericsson, M., Pati, A. K., Sjöqvist, E., Brännlund, J., & Oi, D. K. L. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.090405 · Cited by 69
Single-shot realization of nonadiabatic holonomic quantum gates in decoherence-free subspaces
Zhao, P. Z., Xu, G., Ding, Q.-M., Sjöqvist, E., & Tong, D. M. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.062310 · Cited by 67
Topological Protection and Quantum Noiseless Subsystems
Zanardi, P., & Lloyd, S. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.067902 · Cited by 72
Ai, M.-Z., Li, S., Hou, Z., He, R., Qian, Z.-H., Xue, Z., Cui, J.-M., Huang, Y.-F., Li, C.-F., & Guo, G.-C. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.054062 · Cited by 65
Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation with all-resonant control
Xue, Z., Zhou, J., Chu, Y., & Hu, Y. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.022331 · Cited by 64
Spin network quantum simulator
Marzuoli, A., & Rasetti, M. (2002) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(02)01600-6 · Cited by 66
Self-citationMathematical Foundations of Holonomic Quantum ComputerPreprint
Fujii, K. (2000) · Cited by 64
Introduction to Grassmann manifolds and quantum computation
Fujii, K. (2002) · Journal of Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1155/s1110757x02110163 · Cited by 62
Effect of noise on geometric logic gates for quantum computation
Blais, A., & Tremblay, A. –. S. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.012308 · Cited by 61
GEOMETRIC PHASES AND TOPOLOGICAL QUANTUM COMPUTATION
Vedral, V. (2003) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749903000024 · Cited by 60
Simulation of many-body interactions by conditional geometric phases
Wang, X., & Zanardi, P. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.032327 · Cited by 61
Holonomic Quantum Computation in the Presence of Decoherence
Fuentes, I., Girelli, F., & Livine, E. R. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.020503 · Cited by 60
Optimized geometric quantum computation with a mesoscopic ensemble of Rydberg atoms
Guo, C., Yan, L.-L., Zhang, S., Su, S., & Li, W. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.042607 · Cited by 60
Bacon, D., & Flammia, S. T. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.120504 · Cited by 59
Relativistic Anandan quantum phase in the Lorentz violation background
Bakke, K., Belich, H., & Silva, E. O. (2011) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201100087 · Cited by 59
Universal non-adiabatic holonomic gates in quantum dots and single-molecule magnets
Mousolou, V. A., Canali, C. M., & Sjöqvist, E. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/1/013029 · Cited by 59
Holonomic surface codes for fault-tolerant quantum computation
Zhang, J., Devitt, S. J., You, J. Q., & Nori, F. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.022335 · Cited by 59
Strong-driving-assisted unconventional geometric logic gate in cavity QED
Chen, C., Feng, M., Zhang, X., & Gao, K. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.032344 · Cited by 59
Fermion-qudit quantum processors for simulating lattice gauge theories with matter
Zache, T. V., González-Cuadra, D., & Zoller, P. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-10-16-1140 · Cited by 71
Geometric Phase and Nonadiabatic Effects in an Electronic Harmonic Oscillator
Pechal, M., Berger, S., Abdumalikov, A. A., Fink, J. M., Mlynek, J. A., Steffen, L., Wallraff, A. J., & Filipp, S. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.170401 · Cited by 58
Geometric phase gates with adiabatic control in electron spin resonance
Wu, H., Gauger, E. M., George, R. E., Möttönen, M., Riemann, H. P., Abrosimov, N. V., Becker, P., Pohl, H.-J., Itoh, K. M., Thewalt, M. L. W., et al. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.032326 · Cited by 58
Nonadiabatic noncyclic geometric quantum computation in Rydberg atoms
Liu, B.-J., Su, S., & Yung, M. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043130 · Cited by 58
Song, K., Xiang, S.-H., Liu, Q., & Lu, D.-H. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.032347 · Cited by 58
Berry phase in entangled systems: A proposed experiment with single neutrons
Bertlmann, R. A., Durstberger-Rennhofer, K., Hasegawa, Y., & Hiesmayr, B. C. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.032112 · Cited by 59
Robust gates for holonomic quantum computation
Florio, G., Paolo Facchi, A., Fazio, R., Giovannetti, V., & Pascazio, S. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.022327 · Cited by 57
Second Chern Number and Non-Abelian Berry Phase in Topological Superconducting Systems
Weisbrich, H., Klees, R. L., Rastelli, G., & Belzig, W. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010310 · Cited by 56
Necessary condition for the quantum adiabatic approximation
Boixo, S., & Somma, R. D. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.032308 · Cited by 60
Scheme for unconventional geometric quantum computation in cavity QED
Feng, X., Wang, Z., Wu, C., Kwek, L. C., Lai, C. H., & Oh, C. H. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.052312 · Cited by 58
Superadiabatic holonomic quantum computation in cavity QED
Liu, B.-J., Huang, Z., Xue, Z., & Zhang, X.-D. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.062308 · Cited by 55
Nonadiabatic geometrical quantum gates in semiconductor quantum dots
Solinas, P., Paolo Zanardi, A., Zanghı̀, N., & Rossi, F. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.052309 · Cited by 55
Concatenated Composite Pulses Compensating Simultaneous Systematic Errors
Bando, M., Ichikawa, T., Kondo, Y., & Nakahara, M. (2013) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.82.014004 · Cited by 55
Universal holonomic single quantum gates over a geometric spin with phase-modulated polarized light
Ishida, N., Nakamura, T., Tanaka, T., Mishima, S., Kano, H., Kuroiwa, R., Sekiguchi, Y., & Kosaka, H. (2018) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.43.002380 · Cited by 54
Geometry of three-qubit entanglement
Lévay, P. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.012334 · Cited by 54
On the stability of quantum holonomic gates
Solinas, P., Sassetti, M., Truini, P., & Zanghı̀, N. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/9/093006 · Cited by 53
Quantum entanglement in second-quantized condensed matter systems
Shi, Y. (2004) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/37/26/014 · Cited by 59
Non-Abelian adiabatic geometric transformations in a cold strontium gas
Leroux, F., Pandey, K., Rehbi, R., Chevy, F., Miniatura, C., Grémaud, B., & Wilkowski, D. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05865-3 · Cited by 56
Kleißler, F., Lazariev, A., & Arroyo-Camejo, S. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0098-7 · Cited by 56
Holonomic quantum gates: A semiconductor-based implementation
Solinas, P., Zanardi, P., Zanghı̀, N., & Rossi, F. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.062315 · Cited by 53
Demonstration of Geometric Landau-Zener Interferometry in a Superconducting Qubit
Tan, X., Zhang, D.-W., Zhang, Z., Yu, Y., Han, S., & Zhu, S.-L. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.027001 · Cited by 52
Nonequilibrium thermodynamics as a gauge theory
Polettini, M. (2012) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/97/30003 · Cited by 53
Experimental state control by fast non-Abelian holonomic gates with a superconducting qutrit
Danilin, S., Vepsäläinen, A. P., & Paraoanu, G. S. (2018) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/aab084 · Cited by 52
Marzuoli, A., & Rasetti, M. (2005) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2005.01.005 · Cited by 54
Self-citationHolonomic quantum computation associated with a defect structure of conical graphene
Bakke, K., Furtado, C., & Sergeenkov, S. (2009) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/87/30002 · Cited by 52
Zhu, S.-L., & Wang, Z. D. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.042322 · Cited by 52
Fast Holonomic Quantum Computation on Superconducting Circuits With Optimal Control
Li, S., Chen, T., & Xue, Z. (2020) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202000001 · Cited by 51
Flexible scheme for the implementation of nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation
Kang, Y., Shi, Z., Huang, B., Song, J., & Xia, Y. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.032322 · Cited by 51
Non-orientable order and non-commutative response in frustrated metamaterials
Guo, X., Guzmán, M., Carpentier, D., Bartolo, D., & Coulais, C. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06022-7 · Cited by 51
Geometric Entangling Gates in Decoherence-Free Subspaces with Minimal Requirements
Feng, X., Wu, C., Sun, H., & Oh, C. H. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.200501 · Cited by 51
Introduction to Coherent States and Quantum Information TheoryPreprint
Fujii, K. (2001) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0112090 · Cited by 51
High-Fidelity and Robust Geometric Quantum Gates that Outperform Dynamical Ones
Chen, T., & Xue, Z. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.064009 · Cited by 50
Adiabatic approximation for weakly open systems
Thunström, P., Åberg, J., & Sjöqvist, E. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.022328 · Cited by 49
Noncyclic geometric changes of quantum states
Kult, D., Åberg, J., & Sjöqvist, E. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.022106 · Cited by 49
Computing Spin NetworksPreprint
Marzuoli, A., & Rasetti, M. (2004) · Cited by 49
Self-citationZhou, J., Yu, W.-C., Gao, Y.-M., & Xue, Z.-Y. (2015) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.23.014027 · Cited by 48
Non-stoquastic Hamiltonians in quantum annealing via geometric phases
Vinci, W., & Lidar, D. A. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0037-z · Cited by 53
Experimental realization of nonadiabatic geometric gates with a superconducting Xmon qubit
Zhao, P. Z., Dong, Z., Zhang, Z., Guo, G., Tong, D. M., & Yin, Y. (2021) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-020-1641-1 · Cited by 49
Effects of a squeezed-vacuum reservoir on geometric phase
Wang, Z., Wu, C., Feng, X., Kwek, L. C., Lai, C. H., & Oh, C. H. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.024102 · Cited by 48
Robustness of the adiabatic quantum search
Åberg, J., Kult, D., & Sjöqvist, E. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.060312 · Cited by 46
Coherent Control of Quantum Dynamics with Sequences of Unitary Phase-Kick Pulses
Rego, L. G. C., dos Santos, L. F., & Batista, V. S. (2008) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.040808.090409 · Cited by 47
Inverse engineering control in open quantum systems
Jing, J., Wu, L.-A., Sarandy, M. S., & Muga, J. G. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.053422 · Cited by 45
Robust and Fast Holonomic Quantum Gates with Encoding on Superconducting Circuits
Chen, T., Shen, P., & Xue, Z. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.034038 · Cited by 45
Doubly Geometric Quantum Control
Dong, W., Zhuang, F., Economou, S. E., & Barnes, E. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030333 · Cited by 49
Fast binomial-code holonomic quantum computation with ultrastrong light-matter coupling
Chen, Y., Qin, W., Stassi, R., Wang, X., & Nori, F. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033275 · Cited by 46
Zhao, P. Z., Xu, G., & Tong, D. M. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.062327 · Cited by 45
Zhang, X. D., Zhang, Q., & Wang, Z. D. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.034302 · Cited by 44
General approach for constructing Hamiltonians for nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation
Zhao, P. Z., Li, K. Z., Xu, G., & Tong, D. M. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.062306 · Cited by 44
Systematic-Error-Tolerant Multiqubit Holonomic Entangling Gates
Wu, J., Wang, Y., Han, J., Jiang, Y., Song, J., Xia, Y., Su, S., & Li, W. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.064031 · Cited by 44
Holonomic quantum computation with electron spins in quantum dots
Golovach, V. N., Borhani, M., & Loss, D. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.022315 · Cited by 49
Fast holonomic quantum computation based on solid-state spins with all-optical control
Zhou, J., Liu, B., Hong, Z., & Xue, Z. (2017) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-017-9119-8 · Cited by 43
Heralded atomic nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation with Rydberg blockade
Kang, Y., Shi, Z., Song, J., & Xia, Y. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.022617 · Cited by 43
Li, M., Guo, F.-Q., Jin, Z., Yan, L.-L., Liang, E., & Su, S. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.062607 · Cited by 43
Nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation using a single-loop scenario
Zhang, X.-D., Zhu, S.-L., Hu, L., & Wang, Z. D. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.014302 · Cited by 43
Optimal Multiqubit Operations for Josephson Charge Qubits
Niskanen, A. O., Vartiainen, J. J., & Salomaa, M. M. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.197901 · Cited by 43
Oreshkov, O., & Calsamiglia, J. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.050503 · Cited by 43
Floquet theory of Cooper pair pumping
Russomanno, A., Pugnetti, S., Brosco, V., & Fazio, R. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.83.214508 · Cited by 42
Dissipative universal Lindbladian simulation
Zanardi, P., Marshall, J., & Venuti, L. C. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.022312 · Cited by 46
Quantum Control in Multilevel Systems
Solá, I. R., Chang, B. Y., Malinovskaya, S., & Malinovsky, V. S. (2018) · Advances in atomic, molecular, and optical physics · doi:10.1016/bs.aamop.2018.02.003 · Cited by 43
Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation with Rydberg superatoms
Zhao, P. Z., Wu, X., Xing, T., Xu, G., & Tong, D. M. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.032313 · Cited by 42
Approach to realizing nonadiabatic geometric gates with prescribed evolution paths
Li, K. Z., Zhao, P. Z., & Tong, D. M. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.023295 · Cited by 42
Single-shot realization of nonadiabatic holonomic gates with a superconducting Xmon qutrit
Zhang, Z., Zhao, P. Z., Wang, T., Xiang, L., Jia, Z., Duan, P., Tong, D. M., Yin, Y., & Guo, G. (2019) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab2e26 · Cited by 43
Adiabatic approximation in open systems: an alternative approach
Yi, X. X., Tong, D. M., Kwek, L. C., & Oh, C. H. (2007) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/40/2/004 · Cited by 41
Siewert, J., Brandes, T., & Falci, G. (2009) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.024504 · Cited by 48
Nonunitary geometric phases: A qubit coupled to an environment with random noise
Lombardo, F. C., & Villar, P. I. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.032338 · Cited by 41
Goto, H., & Ichimura, K. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.033404 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Zanardi, P., & Rasetti, M.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Torino (IT)
- Venue
- Physics Letters A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 264
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 94-99
- ISSN
- 0375-9601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025206681
- Cited by
- 1,006
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 21.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physics Letters A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- holonomic quantum computation, Berry phase, non-Abelian holonomy, adiabatic evolution, control field, universal quantum computation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
