The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Holonomic quantum computation
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, since the SU(2) gauge field description is valid for photons down to quantum scale, this approach might be applicable to the design of geometric gates for realizing non-Abelian holonomic quantum computation64,65 with photons.”
From Non-Abelian gauge field optics (2019) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“The Davies approach is based not on the highT limit, but rather on the physically plausible idea of weak coupling. This is natural and consistent with thermodynamics at all temperatures.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“In the Davies approach the Markov approximation is a consequence of weak coupling (and hence slow dynamics of the system in the interaction picture), and time coarse-graining, which leads to cancellation of the non-Markovian oscillating terms.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“The price we pay is the invalidity of this approach for timedependent Hamiltonians, except in the adiabatic case.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“More specifically, Davies' derivation does not invoke a flatness condition on G ( ω ) but is, of course, still subject to the KMS condition.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“Hence, while the Davies approach does not require the highT limit, it imposes severe restrictions on the speed of quantum gates.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Appearance of Gauge Structure in Simple Dynamical Systems
Wilczek, F., & Zee, A. (1984) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.2111 · Cited by 1,775
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.255 · Cited by 1,651
Geometry, Topology and Physics
Nakahara, M. (1990) · doi:10.1887/0750306068 · Cited by 1,620
Wilczek, F. A., & Shapere, A. D. (1989) · Advanced series in mathematical physics · doi:10.1142/0613 · Cited by 1,616
Steane, A. (1998) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/61/2/002 · Cited by 1,391
Two-bit gates are universal for quantum computation
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.51.1015 · Cited by 1,069
Almost Any Quantum Logic Gate is Universal
Lloyd, S. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.346 · Cited by 690
Universality in quantum computation
Deutsch, D. E., Barenco, A., & Ekert, A. (1995) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1995.0065 · Cited by 346
Hermitian vector bundles and the equidistribution of the zeroes of their holomorphic sections
Bott, R., & Chern, S.-S. (1965) · Acta Mathematica · doi:10.1007/bf02391818 · Cited by 294
Geometric phase, bundle classification, and group representation
Mostafazadeh, A. (1996) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.531457 · Cited by 16
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- E. Demler, S.C. Zhang, LANL e-print archive cond-mat/9805404. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 988
Influence from cavity decay on geometric quantum computation in the large-detuning cavity QED model
Chen, C., Zhang, X., Deng, Z. J., Gao, K., & Feng, M. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.032328 · Cited by 26
Song, P., Wei, J.-F., Xu, P., Yan, L.-L., Feng, M., Su, S., & Chen, G. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.022613 · Cited by 25
Geometric driving of two-level quantum systems
Ying, Z.-J., Gentile, P., Baltanás, J. P., Frustaglia, D., Ortix, C., & Cuoco, M. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.023167 · Cited by 28
Realizing multi-qubit controlled nonadiabatic holonomic gates with connecting systems
Xu, G., & Tong, D. M. (2022) · AAPPS bulletin · doi:10.1007/s43673-022-00043-6 · Cited by 25
Observation of Entanglement-Dependent Two-Particle Holonomic Phase
Loredo, J. C., Broome, M. A., Smith, D. H., & White, A. G. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.143603 · Cited by 25
Conceptual aspects of geometric quantum computation
Sjöqvist, E., Mousolou, V. A., & Canali, C. M. (2016) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-016-1381-1 · Cited by 25
Deduction, Computation, Experiment
Lupacchini, R., & Corsi, G. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-88-470-0784-0 · Cited by 25
Optimal experimental dynamical decoupling of both longitudinal and transverse relaxations
Zhen, X.-L., Zhang, F., Feng, G., Li, H., & Long, G. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.022304 · Cited by 25
Searching nonadiabatic holonomic quantum gates via an optimization algorithm
Zhang, F., Zhang, J., Gao, P., & Long, G. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.012329 · Cited by 25
Quantum gates with topological phases
Ionicioiu, R. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.034305 · Cited by 25
Robustness against parametric noise of nonideal holonomic gates
Lupo, C., Aniello, P., Napolitano, M., & Florio, G. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.012309 · Cited by 25
Uniquely defined geometric phase of an open system
Burić, N., & Radonjić, M. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.014101 · Cited by 25
de Lima, A. G., Belich, H., & Bakke, K. (2013) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/i2013-13154-5 · Cited by 24
Dynamical-invariant-based holonomic quantum gates: Theory and experiment
Li, Y., Xin, T., Qiu, C.-D., Li, K., Liu, G., Li, J., Wan, Y., & Lu, D. (2022) · Fundamental Research · doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2021.11.036 · Cited by 24
Topological quantization by controlled paths: Application to Cooper pairs pumps
Leone, R., & Lévy, L. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.064524 · Cited by 24
Geometric quantum gates in liquid-state NMR based on a cancellation of dynamical phases
Ota, Y., Goto, Y., Kondo, Y., & Nakahara, M. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.052311 · Cited by 24
FROM GEOMETRY TO QUANTUM COMPUTATION
Fujii, K. (2002) · International Symposium on Quantum Theory and Symmetries (QTS) · doi:10.1142/9789812777850_0040 · Cited by 24
Multi-target-qubit unconventional geometric phase gate in a multi-cavity system
Liu, T., Cao, X.-Z., Su, Q.-P., Xiong, S.-J., & Yang, C. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep21562 · Cited by 24
Adiabatic geometric phase for a Bose-Einstein condensate coupled to a cavity
Li, S.-C., Fu, L., & Liu, J. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.053610 · Cited by 24
Baksic, A., Belyansky, R., Ribeiro, H., & Clerk, A. A. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.021801 · Cited by 25
Direct observation of geometric phases using a three-pinhole interferometer
Kobayashi, H., Tamate, S., Nakanishi, T., Sugiyama, K., & Kitano, M. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.012104 · Cited by 24
Effect of intersubsystem coupling on the geometric phase in a bipartite system
Yi, X. X., & Sjöqvist, E. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.042104 · Cited by 24
Holonomic quantum computation with superconducting charge-phase qubits in a cavity
Feng, Z., & Zhang, X.-D. (2007) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2007.10.032 · Cited by 24
Entanglement and the Berry phase in a new Yang–Baxter system
Wang, G., Xue, K., Wu, C., He, L., & Oh, C. H. (2009) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/12/125207 · Cited by 24
Xiao, Y., Kang, Y., Zheng, R., Song, J., Chen, Y., & Xia, Y. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.062610 · Cited by 23
Reverse engineering of a Hamiltonian for a three-level system via the Rodrigues’ rotation formula
Kang, Y., Huang, B., Lu, P.-M., & Xia, Y. (2016) · Laser Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/1612-202x/aa512d · Cited by 23
Non-Abelian geometric phases in ground-state Josephson devices
Pirkkalainen, J.-M., Solinas, P., Pekola, J. P., & Möttönen, M. (2010) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.174506 · Cited by 23
Pluecker, T., Wegewijs, M. R., & Splettstoesser, J. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.155431 · Cited by 23
Uhlmann’s geometric phase in presence of isotropic decoherence
Tidström, J., & Sjöqvist, E. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.032110 · Cited by 23
Kang, Y., Xiao, Y., Shi, Z., Wang, Y., Yang, J., Song, J., & Xia, Y. (2023) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/acc2de · Cited by 22
Fast and Robust Geometric Two-Qubit Gates for Superconducting Qubits and beyond
Setiawan, F., Groszkowski, P., & Clerk, A. A. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.19.034071 · Cited by 24
On the interaction between an electric quadrupole moment and electric fields
Bakke, K. (2012) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201100322 · Cited by 22
Holonomic Quantum Computation in Surface Codes
Wu, C., Wang, Y., Feng, X., & Chen, J. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.13.014055 · Cited by 21
Measuring Quantum Geometric Tensor of Non-Abelian System in Superconducting Circuits
Zheng, W., Xu, J., Ma, Z., Li, Y., Dong, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Sun, G., Wu, P., Zhao, J., et al. (2022) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/39/10/100202 · Cited by 22
Nonadiabatic quantum state engineering driven by fast quench dynamics
Herrera, M., Sarandy, M. S., Duzzioni, E. I., & Serra, R. M. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.022323 · Cited by 21
Noncyclic Geometric Quantum Gates with Smooth Paths via Invariant‐Based Shortcuts
Ji, L., Ding, C., Chen, T., & Xue, Z. (2021) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202100019 · Cited by 21
Fast high-fidelity geometric quantum control with quantum brachistochrones
Dong, Y., Feng, C., Zheng, Y. H., Chen, X.-D., Guo, G., & Sun, F. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.043177 · Cited by 21
High-dimensional SO(4)-symmetric Rydberg manifolds for quantum simulation
Kruckenhauser, A., van Bijnen, R., Zache, T. V., Liberto, M. F. D., & Zoller, P. (2022) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aca996 · Cited by 23
Self-protected quantum algorithms based on quantum state tomography
Wu, L.-A., & Byrd, M. (2008) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-008-0090-9 · Cited by 21
Robust and fast geometric quantum computation with multiqubit gates in cavity QED
Lin, G., Zou, X., Lin, X., & Guo, G. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.064303 · Cited by 21
Holonomic Quantum Computation in Subsystems
Oreshkov, O. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.090502 · Cited by 23
Geometric phase of a qubit in dephasing environments
Dajka, J., Mierzejewski, M., & Łuczka, J. (2007) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/1/012001 · Cited by 21
Holonomic quantum computing based on the Stark effect
Bernevig, B. A., & Zhang, S. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.035303 · Cited by 21
Quantum holonomies with Josephson-junction devices
Cholascinski, M. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.134516 · Cited by 21
Bibliographic guide to the foundations of quantum mechanics and quantum informationPreprint
Cabello, A. (2000) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0012089 · Cited by 33
Multi-mode architectures for noise-resilient superconducting qubits
Calzona, A., & Carrega, M. (2022) · Superconductor Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/1361-6668/acaa64 · Cited by 20
Quantum computation with cold bosonic atoms in an optical lattice
García‐Ripoll, J. J., & Cirac, J. I. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2003.1220 · Cited by 20
On the power of coherently controlled quantum adiabatic evolutions
Kieferová, M., & Wiebe, N. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/12/123034 · Cited by 20
Quantum Error Suppression with Commuting Hamiltonians: Two Local is Too Local
Marvian, I., & Lidar, D. A. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.260504 · Cited by 20
Nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation with trapped ions
Li, X.-Q., Cen, L.-X., Huang, G., Ма, Л., & Yan, Y. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.042320 · Cited by 22
All-electric qubit control in heavy hole quantum dots via non-Abelian geometric phases
Budich, J. C., Rothe, D. G., Hankiewicz, E. M., & Trauzettel, B. (2012) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.205425 · Cited by 20
Universal control of quantum subspaces and subsystems
Zanardi, P., & Lloyd, S. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.022313 · Cited by 28
Berry curvature as a lower bound for multiparameter estimation
Guo, W., Zhong, W., Jing, X.-X., Fu, L.-B., & Wang, X. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.042115 · Cited by 19
Experimental Implementation of Short-Path Nonadiabatic Geometric Gates in a Superconducting Circuit
Yang, X.-X., Guo, L.-L., Zhang, H.-F., Du, L., Zhang, C., Tao, H., Chen, Y., Duan, P., Jia, Z.-L., Kong, W., et al. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.19.044076 · Cited by 19
Noncyclic nonadiabatic geometric quantum gates in a superconducting circuit
Ma, Z., Xu, J., Chen, T., Zhang, Y., Zheng, W., Li, S., Lan, D., Xue, Z., Tan, X., & Yu, Y. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.20.054047 · Cited by 19
Non-Abelian Holonomy in Degenerate Non-Hermitian Systems
Shan, Z., Sun, Y., Tao, R., Chen, Q., Tian, Z., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.053802 · Cited by 19
Berry phase and Hannay angle of an interacting boson system
Li, S.-C., Liu, J., & Fu, L. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.042107 · Cited by 19
Quantum tunneling via quantum geometric phase
Wang, Z. S., Kwek, L. C., Lai, C. H., & Oh, C. H. (2006) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2006.07.071 · Cited by 19
Experimental demonstration of a unified framework for mixed-state geometric phases
Zhu, J., Shi, M., Vedral, V., Peng, X., Suter, D., & Du, J. (2011) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/94/20007 · Cited by 19
Adiabatically steered open quantum systems: Master equation and optimal phase
Salmilehto, J., Solinas, P., Ankerhold, J., & Möttönen, M. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.062112 · Cited by 19
Geometric Quantum Computation with Shortcuts to Adiabaticity
Du, Y.-X., Liang, Z.-T., Yan, H., & Zhu, S.-L. (2019) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.201900013 · Cited by 19
High‐Fidelity Geometric Quantum Gates with Short Paths on Superconducting Circuits
Li, S., Xue, J., Chen, T., & Xue, Z. (2021) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202000140 · Cited by 19
Nonadiabatic geometric quantum gates that are insensitive to qubit-frequency drifts
Zhou, J., Li, S., Pan, G., Zhang, G., Chen, T., & Xue, Z. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.032609 · Cited by 19
Setiawan, F., Groszkowski, P., Ribeiro, H., & Clerk, A. A. (2021) · University of Chicago · doi:10.6082/hfwax-5pa07 · Cited by 19
Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation and its optimal control
Liang, Y., Shen, P., Chen, T., & Xue, Z. (2023) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-023-3824-0 · Cited by 19
Concurrence vectors for entanglement of high-dimensional systems
Li, Y.-Q., & Zhu, G.-Q. (2008) · 物理学前沿：英文版 · doi:10.1007/s11467-008-0022-2 · Cited by 19
New anatomy of quantum holonomy
Cheon, T., & Tanaka, A. (2009) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/85/20001 · Cited by 19
Non-adiabatic holonomic quantum computation in linear system-bath coupling
Sun, C., Wang, G., Wu, C., Liu, H., Feng, X., Chen, J., & Xue, K. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep20292 · Cited by 19
Exploring Non-Abelian Geometric Phases in Spin-1 Ultracold Atoms
Madhusudhana, B. H., Boguslawski, M., Barrios, M., Xin, L., & Chapman, M. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.173202 · Cited by 19
Perturbative formulation and nonadiabatic corrections in adiabatic quantum-computing schemes
Shi, Y., & Wu, Y.-S. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.024301 · Cited by 19
Corrections to the Berry phase in a solid-state qubit due to low-frequency noise
Lombardo, F. C., & Villar, P. I. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.012110 · Cited by 19
Operational geometric phase for mixed quantum states
Andersson, O., & Heydari, H. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/5/053006 · Cited by 18
Superadiabatic theory for Cooper pair pumping under decoherence
Salmilehto, J., & Möttönen, M. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.174507 · Cited by 18
Adiabatic leakage elimination operator in an experimental framework
Wang, Z.-M., Byrd, M., Jing, J., & Wu, L.-A. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.062312 · Cited by 18
Dephasing-Protected Scalable Holonomic Quantum Computation on a Rabi Lattice
Wang, Y., Su, Y., Chen, X., & Wu, C. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.044043 · Cited by 18
Adiabatic topological quantum computing
Cesare, C., Landahl, A. J., Bacon, D., Flammia, S. T., & Neels, A. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.012336 · Cited by 23
Efficient quantum processing of three-manifold topological invariants
Garnerone, S., Marzuoli, A., & Rasetti, M. (2009) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.2009.v13.n6.a1 · Cited by 21
Self-citationNon-Markovian effects on the geometric phase
Huang, X. L., & Yi, X. X. (2008) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/82/50001 · Cited by 18
Geometric quantization of mechanical systems with time-dependent parameters
GIACHETTA, G., Mangiarotti, L., & Sardanashvily, G. A. (2002) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1477262 · Cited by 18
Zhang, J., Peng, X., Rajendran, N., & Suter, D. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.042314 · Cited by 18
Refocusing schemes for holonomic quantum computation in the presence of dissipation
Cen, L.-X., & Zanardi, P. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.052323 · Cited by 19
Transient logic operations in acoustics through dynamic modulation
Chen, Z., Ma, L., Ge, S., Chen, Z., Lu, Y., Chen, Y., & Lu, Y. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.21.l011001 · Cited by 17
Bakke, K., & Furtado, C. (2011) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2011.11.009 · Cited by 17
Holonomic quantum computing in symmetry-protected ground states of spin chains
Renes, J. M., Miyake, A., Brennen, G. K., & Bartlett, S. D. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/2/025020 · Cited by 17
Scalar Aharonov‐Bohm‐type effect induced by Lorentz symmetry breaking effects
de Lima, A. G., Belich, H., & Bakke, K. (2014) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201400072 · Cited by 17
Quantum independent-set problem and non-Abelian adiabatic mixing
Wu, B., Yu, H., & Wilczek, F. A. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.012318 · Cited by 19
Quantum computation using the Aharonov–Casher set up
Ericsson, M., & Sjöqvist, E. (2002) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(02)01235-5 · Cited by 17
Non-Abelian geometric phase in the diamond nitrogen-vacancy center
Kowarsky, M., Hollenberg, L. C. L., & Martin, A. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.042116 · Cited by 17
Decoherence-induced geometric phase in a multilevel atomic system
Dasgupta, S., & Lidar, D. A. (2007) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/40/9/s07 · Cited by 17
Quantum renormalization group approach to geometric phases in spin chains
Jafari, R. (2013) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2013.10.034 · Cited by 17
Fast multiqubit Rydberg geometric fan-out gates with optimal control technology
Wei, J.-F., Guo, F.-Q., Wang, D.-Y., Jia, Y., Yan, L.-L., Feng, M., & Su, S. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.042404 · Cited by 16
Universal perspective on nonadiabatic quantum control
Jin, Z.-Y., & Jing, J. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.012406 · Cited by 16
Geometric Phase for Optical Free Induction Decay
Yu, Y., Chen, Z., Hu, L., Tang, H., & Wang, Z. (2010) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-010-0503-2 · Cited by 16
Quantal interferometry with dissipative internal motion
Sjöqvist, E. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.052109 · Cited by 16
Zhong, W., Cheng, G., & Chen, A. (2010) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/19/11/110310 · Cited by 16
Highly degenerate photonic waveguide structures for holonomic computation
Pinske, J., Teuber, L., & Scheel, S. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.062314 · Cited by 17
Yun, M.-R., Guo, F.-Q., Yan, L.-L., Liang, E., Zhang, Y., Su, S., Shan, C., & Jia, Y. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.012611 · Cited by 16
Enhanced-Fidelity Ultrafast Geometric Quantum Computation Using Strong Classical Drives
Chen, Y., Miranowicz, A., Chen, X., Xia, Y., & Nori, F. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.064059 · Cited by 16
Detecting the multi-spin interaction of an XY spin chain by the geometric phase of a coupled qubit
Zhang, X.-X., Zhang, A., & Li, F. (2012) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2012.05.018 · Cited by 16
Detecting unambiguously non-Abelian geometric phases with trapped ions
Zhang, X.-D., Wang, Z. D., Hu, L.-B., Zhang, Z.-M., & Zhu, S.-L. (2008) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/4/043031 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Zanardi, P., & Rasetti, M.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Torino (IT)
- Venue
- Physics Letters A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 264
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 94-99
- ISSN
- 0375-9601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025206681
- Cited by
- 1,006
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 21.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physics Letters A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- holonomic quantum computation, Berry phase, non-Abelian holonomy, adiabatic evolution, control field, universal quantum computation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
