The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Holonomic quantum computation
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, since the SU(2) gauge field description is valid for photons down to quantum scale, this approach might be applicable to the design of geometric gates for realizing non-Abelian holonomic quantum computation64,65 with photons.”
From Non-Abelian gauge field optics (2019) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“The Davies approach is based not on the highT limit, but rather on the physically plausible idea of weak coupling. This is natural and consistent with thermodynamics at all temperatures.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“In the Davies approach the Markov approximation is a consequence of weak coupling (and hence slow dynamics of the system in the interaction picture), and time coarse-graining, which leads to cancellation of the non-Markovian oscillating terms.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“The price we pay is the invalidity of this approach for timedependent Hamiltonians, except in the adiabatic case.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“More specifically, Davies' derivation does not invoke a flatness condition on G ( ω ) but is, of course, still subject to the KMS condition.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“Hence, while the Davies approach does not require the highT limit, it imposes severe restrictions on the speed of quantum gates.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Appearance of Gauge Structure in Simple Dynamical Systems
Wilczek, F., & Zee, A. (1984) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.2111 · Cited by 1,775
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.255 · Cited by 1,651
Geometry, Topology and Physics
Nakahara, M. (1990) · doi:10.1887/0750306068 · Cited by 1,620
Wilczek, F. A., & Shapere, A. D. (1989) · Advanced series in mathematical physics · doi:10.1142/0613 · Cited by 1,616
Steane, A. (1998) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/61/2/002 · Cited by 1,391
Two-bit gates are universal for quantum computation
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.51.1015 · Cited by 1,069
Almost Any Quantum Logic Gate is Universal
Lloyd, S. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.346 · Cited by 690
Universality in quantum computation
Deutsch, D. E., Barenco, A., & Ekert, A. (1995) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1995.0065 · Cited by 346
Hermitian vector bundles and the equidistribution of the zeroes of their holomorphic sections
Bott, R., & Chern, S.-S. (1965) · Acta Mathematica · doi:10.1007/bf02391818 · Cited by 294
Geometric phase, bundle classification, and group representation
Mostafazadeh, A. (1996) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.531457 · Cited by 16
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- E. Demler, S.C. Zhang, LANL e-print archive cond-mat/9805404. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 988
TOWARDS A QUANTUM ALGORITHM FOR THE PERMANENT
Marzuoli, A., & Rasetti, M. (2007) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749907002669 · Cited by 3
Self-citationGeometric single‐qubit gates for an electron spin in a quantum dot
Malinovsky, V. S., & Rudin, S. (2012) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.24202 · Cited by 3
Buividovich, P. V., & Кувшинов, В. И. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.022336 · Cited by 3
Quantum phase gate via stimulated Raman adiabatic passage with time-dependent two-photon detuning
Nakamura, S. X., Goto, H., & Ichimura, K. (2012) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2012.11.001 · Cited by 3
BERRY PHASE OF ATOM-FIELD SYSTEM IN INTERACTING FOCK SPACE
Das, P., & Haldar, P. (2011) · Modern Physics Letters B · doi:10.1142/s0217984911027029 · Cited by 3
Huang, W., Du, Y.-X., Liang, Z.-T., & Yan, H. (2015) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2015.10.053 · Cited by 3
Non Abelian Phases, Charge Pumping and Holonomic Computation with Josephson Junctions
Faoro, L., Siewert, J., & Fazio, R. (2003) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.1143/jpsjs.72sa.3 · Cited by 3
Quantum friction imprints on the geometric phase of a moving atom in front of a dielectric plate
Lombardo, F. C., & Villar, P. I. (2017) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/880/1/012035 · Cited by 3
Quantum computing in exactly solvable models and geometric phases
Suzko, A. A., & Giorgadze, G. K. (2008) · Journal of Mathematical Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10958-008-9125-0 · Cited by 3
Exact solutions for a universal set of quantum gates on a family of isospectral spin chains
Karimipour, V., & Majd, N. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.052305 · Cited by 3
Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional
Zacatenco, U. (2013) · Cited by 3
Entangling power of holonomic gates in atom-based systems
Mousolou, V. A., & Sjöqvist, E. (2018) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aae78b · Cited by 3
Effects of geometry on spin-orbit Kramers states in semiconducting nanorings
Francica, G., Gentile, P., & Cuoco, M. (2019) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/127/30001 · Cited by 3
Berry-phase gates for fast and robust control of atomic clock states
Song, Y., Lim, J., & Ahn, J. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.023045 · Cited by 3
Berry phase induced entanglement of hole-spin qubits in a microwave cavity
Wysokiński, M. M., Płodzień, M., & Trif, M. (2021) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.l041402 · Cited by 3
Quantum holonomy based in a Kaluza–Klein description for defects in C60 fullerenes
Cavalcante, E., & Furtado, C. (2021) · International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics · doi:10.1142/s0219887821501632 · Cited by 3
Berry Phase of Two Impurity Qubits as a Signature of Dicke Quantum Phase Transition
Lu, W., Zhai, C., Liu, Y., Song, Y., Yuan, J.-B., & Tang, S.-Q. (2022) · Photonics · doi:10.3390/photonics9110844 · Cited by 3
Sinha, A. (2022) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2021.0413 · Cited by 3
Coherent States and Some Topics in Quantum Information Theory : ReviewPreprint
Fujii, K. (2002) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0207178 · Cited by 3
Geometric Phase of an Open System
Burić, N., & Radonjić, M. (2009) · Acta Physica Polonica A · doi:10.12693/aphyspola.116.483 · Cited by 3
Exact solutions for universal holonomic quantum gates
Karimipour, V., & Majd, N. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.012320 · Cited by 3
The Fisher-Hartwig Formula and Generalized Entropies in XY Spin ChainPreprint
Its, A. R., & Korepin, V. E. (2009) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0906.4511 · Cited by 3
Holonomic Quantum ComputationPreprint
Carollo, A. C. M., & Vedral, V. (2005) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0504205 · Cited by 3
Yousefi, N. N., & Mortezapour, A. (2024) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.202300361 · Cited by 2
Chiral resolution based on non-adiabatic holonomic quantum control via a transmon qutrit
Xu, L., Li, Y., Xu, J., Lan, D., Tan, X., & Yu, Y. (2024) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/5.0180152 · Cited by 2
Universal and robust quantum coherent control based on a chirped-pulse driving protocol
Yin, Y.-H., Yang, J.-X., & Cen, L.-X. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.042430 · Cited by 2
Braiding of Majorana bound states in a driven-dissipative Majorana box setup
Wu, K., Kadijani, S. S., & Schmidt, T. L. (2024) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ad96da · Cited by 2
Hong, Y., Cui, F.-F., Ji, L., Xue, Z., & Chen, T. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.064095 · Cited by 2
Suppression of systematic errors in holonomic quantum gates via multipath correction
Sun, S.-Y., Ji, L., Cui, F.-F., Xue, Z., & Chen, T. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.062621 · Cited by 2
Robust holonomic quantum gates via cyclic evolution protection
Liang, Y., Chen, T., & Xue, Z. (2025) · APL Quantum · doi:10.1063/5.0249368 · Cited by 2
Non-Abelian Thouless pumping in a Rice–Mele ladder
Danieli, C., Brosco, V., Pilozzi, L., & Citro, R. (2025) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0245350 · Cited by 2
Noury, A., & Tavassoly, M. K. (2025) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ade1b0 · Cited by 2
Time-optimal holonomic quantum gates on Rydberg atoms
Li, J.-Q., Li, H., 宋, P.-Y. 佩. S., Wu, J. F., Liang, Y., & Su, S. (2025) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/adfd2d · Cited by 2
Multiple-noise-resilient nonadiabatic geometric quantum control of solid-state spins in diamond
Chen, S.-Q., Duan, Q.-T., Zhang, C., & Lu, H. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/bq9h-qrd3 · Cited by 2
Open Quantum Systems and the Parametric Representation: From Entanglement to Berry’s Phase
Calvani, D., Cuccoli, A., Gidopoulos, N. I., & Verrucchi, P. (2013) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-013-1749-2 · Cited by 2
Berry phase of two atoms in the same quantized light field
Liang, M.-L., Zhang, J.-H., & Yuan, B. (2007) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.200610238 · Cited by 2
Berry phase in a generalized nonlinear two-level system
Liu, J., Li, J., Song, P., & Li, W. (2008) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/17/1/007 · Cited by 2
Dynamical-corrected nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation
Ding, C.-Y., Chen, L., Zhang, L., & Xue, Z. (2023) · Frontiers of Physics · doi:10.1007/s11467-023-1322-2 · Cited by 2
Nonadiabatic braiding of Majorana modes
Yu, F., Zhao, P. Z., & Gong, J. (2025) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/kfwb-71wf · Cited by 2
Non-adiabatic holonomic manipulation of the polariton qubit in circuit QED
Xue, Z., Yu, W.-C., Yang, L.-N., & Hu, Y. (2015) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2015-50886-0 · Cited by 3
Quantum Information and Symmetry
Leoński, W., Kalaga, J. K., & Szczȩśniak, R. (2020) · MDPI eBooks · doi:10.3390/books978-3-03928-801-4 · Cited by 2
Wu, X., Jiao, Y., Jia, S.-P., Zhang, J., Zhai, C., & Kuang, L. (2022) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-022-03567-w · Cited by 2
Liu, S., Yang, H., Qin, J., Ran, D., Kang, Y., & Xia, Y. (2025) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202400542 · Cited by 2
Speeding up adiabatic holonomic quantum gates via π-pulse modulation
Zhang, J., Xing, T., & Long, G. (2025) · Fundamental Research · doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2025.05.005 · Cited by 2
Isoholonomic inequality and tight implementations of holonomic quantum gates
Sönnerborn, O. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.052430 · Cited by 2
Non-Abelian quantum holonomy of hydrogenlike atoms
Mousolou, V. A., Canali, C. M., & Sjöqvist, E. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.032111 · Cited by 2
Adiabatic holonomic quantum gates for a single qubit
Malinovsky, V. S., & Rudin, S. (2014) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2014/t160/014029 · Cited by 2
Measurement of geometric phases by robust interferometric methods
Loredo, J. C., Ortiz, O., Ballón, A., & Zela, F. D. (2011) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/274/1/012140 · Cited by 2
Geometric phase and gauge theory structure in quantum computing
Bruno, A., Capolupo, A., Kak, S., Raimondo, G., & Vitiello, G. (2011) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/306/1/012065 · Cited by 2
Geometric phase of interacting qubits: Mean-field analysis
Dajka, J., Mierzejewski, M., & Łuczka, J. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.044303 · Cited by 2
Yang, W., & Chen, A.-X. (2008) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/49/4/23 · Cited by 2
Geometric phase for a coupled two quantum dot system
Joshi, A., & Hassan, S. S. (2011) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2011.01.066 · Cited by 2
Quantum computing in decoherence-free subspaces with coupled charge qubits
Feng, Z., & Zhang, X.-D. (2007) · Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures · doi:10.1016/j.physe.2007.10.086 · Cited by 2
A geometrical setting for geometric phases on complex Grassmann manifolds
Abbati, M. C., & Manià, A. (2006) · Journal of Geometry and Physics · doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2006.06.002 · Cited by 2
Geometric quantum computation with Josephson qubits
Falci, G., Fazio, R., Palma, G. M., Siewert, J., & Vedral, V. (2001) · Physica C Superconductivity · doi:10.1016/s0921-4534(00)01703-2 · Cited by 2
Overcoming Decoherent Effects from Squeezed Vacuum Reservoir
Rao, H. S. S., Hu, L., Liu, G. Q., & Wang, Z. (2010) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-010-0378-2 · Cited by 2
Quantum gates and Berry phases in Josephson nanostructures
Falci, G., Fazio, R., & Palma, G. M. (2003) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/prop.200310060 · Cited by 2
Simulation of the many-body dynamical quantum Hall effect in an optical lattice
Zhang, D.-W., & Yang, X.-C. (2016) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-016-1252-9 · Cited by 2
Ghosh, S. (2019) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-019-04169-6 · Cited by 2
Basic properties of coherent-squeezed states revisited
Fujii, K., & Ôike, H. (2014) · International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics · doi:10.1142/s0219887814500510 · Cited by 2
Single-Qubit Driving Fields and Mathieu Functions
Enríquez, M., Jaimes-Nájera, A., & Delgado, F. (2019) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym11091172 · Cited by 2
Implementation of Hybridly Protected Quantum Gates
Wu, C., Sun, C., Wang, G., Feng, X., & Yi, X. X. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.17.034003 · Cited by 2
Controllable tunability of a Chern number within the electronic-nuclear spin system in diamond
Lee, J., Arai, K., Zhang, H., Ku, M., & Walsworth, R. L. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00732-6 · Cited by 2
Universal quantum gates by nonadiabatic holonomic evolution for the surface electron
Wang, J., He, W., Wang, H.-B., & Ai, Q. (2024) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2024.1348804 · Cited by 2
Scalable geometric quantum computing with Cooper-pair box qubits in circuit QED
Feng, Z., & Zhang, C. (2010) · Physica C Superconductivity · doi:10.1016/j.physc.2010.01.006 · Cited by 2
Wave Packets Can Factorize Numbers
Mack, H., Bienert, M., Haug, F., Freyberger, M., & Schleich, W. P. (2002) · physica status solidi (b) · doi:10.1002/1521-3951(200210)233:3 · Cited by 21
Atomic structure and physical properties of fused porphyrin nanoclusters
Avramov, P. V., Kuzubov, A. A., 境, 誠., Ohtomo, M., Entani, S., Matsumoto, Y., Eleseeva, N. S., Pomogaev, V. A., & Naramoto, H. (2014) · Journal of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines · doi:10.1142/s1088424614500291 · Cited by 2
Consideration of geometric phase and population transfer without using rotating-wave approximation
Berrada, K., & Eleuch, H. (2015) · Laser Physics · doi:10.1088/1054-660x/25/2/025201 · Cited by 2
Geometric phase of a spin-1 2 particle coupled to a quantum vector operator
Aguilar, P., Chryssomalakos, C., & Guzmán-González, E. (2016) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s021773231650098x · Cited by 2
Yan, G.-A., & Lu, H. (2020) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-020-04500-6 · Cited by 2
Fundamental Limitation on Cooling under Classical Noise
Jing, J., Chhajlany, R. W., & Wu, L.-A. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00194-9 · Cited by 2
Tanaka, A., Nakamura, T., & Cheon, T. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.013308 · Cited by 2
Nonadiabatic Geometric Gates with a Shortened Loop in a Superconducting Circuit
Li, Y., Dong, Y., Zheng, W., Zhang, Y., Ma, Z., Liu, Q., Wang, J., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Zhao, J., et al. (2022) · physica status solidi (b) · doi:10.1002/pssb.202200040 · Cited by 2
Quantum correlations in optomechanical system in the presence of optical feedback
Eshete, S. (2022) · Physics Open · doi:10.1016/j.physo.2022.100100 · Cited by 2
Geometrically robust linear optics from non-Abelian geometric phases
Pinske, J., & Scheel, S. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.023086 · Cited by 2
Operating a geometric quantum gate by external controllable parameters
Ji, Y., Cai, S., Jian-Xin, L., & Zisheng, W. (2010) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/19/1/010311 · Cited by 2
On non-adiabatic holonomic quantum computer
Shalyt-Margolin, A., Стражев, В. И., & Tregubovich, A. Y. (2003) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(03)00677-7 · Cited by 2
Shen, J. Q. (2005) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/73/1/011 · Cited by 2
Nonadiabatic corrections to a quantum dot quantum computer working in adiabatic limit
Ávila, M. (2014) · Pramana · doi:10.1007/s12043-014-0772-z · Cited by 1
Berry phase of two atoms in the same quantized light field
Liang, M.-L., Zhang, J.-H., & Yuan, B. (2007) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.200751905-603 · Cited by 1
Double Wilczek–Zee connection and mixed-state quantum geometric tensor
Wang, X., Lu, X.-M., Liu, J., Ding, W., & Fu, L. (2025) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/adf4b0 · Cited by 1
Modulating Chern number of spin- J model with the superconducting qudit
Che, H.-X., Zhang, X., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Tan, X., & Yu, Y. (2025) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/5.0290788 · Cited by 1
Measurement of heralded single-photon geometric phases by robust interferometric methods
Machuca, I., Larios, D., & Ortiz, O. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/x9lc-j8jb · Cited by 1
Approaching the critical point through an exact ground-state evolution
Lin, J., Yan, K.-X., Song, J., Chen, Y., & Xia, Y. (2026) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/yd3b-r78m · Cited by 1
Quantum Channels and Quantum Operations
Bertlmann, R. A., & Friis, N. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199683338.003.0021 · Cited by 2
Uhlmann phases in the Kitaev chain with NNN hopping interaction
Liu, S., & Hou, Q. (2023) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ad1151 · Cited by 1
Wang, C., Liu, B., Yun, M.-R., Zhu, X., & Su, S. (2024) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-024-05746-0 · Cited by 1
Non-adiabatic holonomies for photonic quantum computing
Neef, V., Pinske, J., Wolterink, T. A. W., Becker, K., Heinrich, M., Scheel, S., & Szameit, A. (2024) · Optica Quantum · doi:10.1364/opticaq.530855 · Cited by 2
Singkanipa, P., Xia, Z., & Lidar, D. A. (2025) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2025-08-05-1821 · Cited by 2
Exploring quasi-geometric frameworks for quantum error-correcting codes: a systematic review
Nyirahafashimana, V., Shah, N. M., Halim, U. A., & Othman, М. (2025) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-025-04904-5 · Cited by 2
A universal set of geometric quantum gates through dressed-states assisted shortcuts to adiabaticity
Rus, M. E., Ferrón, A., Osenda, O., & Gómez, S. S. (2026) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ae407b · Cited by 1
Solitonic Andreev spin qubits from Andreev states in Corbino Josephson junctions
San-José, P., & Prada, E. (2026) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/nnzv-7nqy · Cited by 2
Experimental realization of logical elastic bits as qubit analogues in a nonlinear oscillator
Mahmood, K. T., Faiaz, A. N.-E., Hasan, M. A., Deymier, P. A., Runge, K., & Levine, J. A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-33387-8 · Cited by 1
Anonymous, Han, J. Z., HUANG, 黄. J.-D., Qian, Y., Yan, Y., & Huang, Z.-G. (2026) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/sqwc-554s · Cited by 1
Holonomic quantum computation with squeezed coherent states
Lucarelli, D. G., & TARN, T. J. (2003) · IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · doi:10.1109/cdc.2002.1184537 · Cited by 1
Topological Code Architectures for Quantum Computation
Cesare, C. A. (2014) · UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico) · Cited by 1
Quantum effect of inductance on geometric Cooper-pair transport
Salmilehto, J., & Möttönen, M. (2012) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.184512 · Cited by 1
Kim, S. C., Kim, Y. J., Park, P. S., Hwang, N. Y., & Yang, S.-R. E. (2008) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/20/42/425224 · Cited by 1
Spectral weighted geometric phase for mixed quantum states
Andersson, O., & Heydari, H. (2014) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2014/t163/014027 · Cited by 1
Geometrical light transfer in optical waveguide arrays
Zhang, X.-D., Liu, W., & Yang, G.-F. (2014) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-014-0893-9 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Zanardi, P., & Rasetti, M.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Torino (IT)
- Venue
- Physics Letters A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 264
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 94-99
- ISSN
- 0375-9601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025206681
- Cited by
- 1,006
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 21.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physics Letters A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- holonomic quantum computation, Berry phase, non-Abelian holonomy, adiabatic evolution, control field, universal quantum computation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
