The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Holonomic quantum computation
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, since the SU(2) gauge field description is valid for photons down to quantum scale, this approach might be applicable to the design of geometric gates for realizing non-Abelian holonomic quantum computation64,65 with photons.”
From Non-Abelian gauge field optics (2019) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“The Davies approach is based not on the highT limit, but rather on the physically plausible idea of weak coupling. This is natural and consistent with thermodynamics at all temperatures.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“In the Davies approach the Markov approximation is a consequence of weak coupling (and hence slow dynamics of the system in the interaction picture), and time coarse-graining, which leads to cancellation of the non-Markovian oscillating terms.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“The price we pay is the invalidity of this approach for timedependent Hamiltonians, except in the adiabatic case.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“More specifically, Davies' derivation does not invoke a flatness condition on G ( ω ) but is, of course, still subject to the KMS condition.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“Hence, while the Davies approach does not require the highT limit, it imposes severe restrictions on the speed of quantum gates.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Appearance of Gauge Structure in Simple Dynamical Systems
Wilczek, F., & Zee, A. (1984) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.2111 · Cited by 1,775
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.255 · Cited by 1,651
Geometry, Topology and Physics
Nakahara, M. (1990) · doi:10.1887/0750306068 · Cited by 1,620
Wilczek, F. A., & Shapere, A. D. (1989) · Advanced series in mathematical physics · doi:10.1142/0613 · Cited by 1,616
Steane, A. (1998) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/61/2/002 · Cited by 1,391
Two-bit gates are universal for quantum computation
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.51.1015 · Cited by 1,069
Almost Any Quantum Logic Gate is Universal
Lloyd, S. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.346 · Cited by 690
Universality in quantum computation
Deutsch, D. E., Barenco, A., & Ekert, A. (1995) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1995.0065 · Cited by 346
Hermitian vector bundles and the equidistribution of the zeroes of their holomorphic sections
Bott, R., & Chern, S.-S. (1965) · Acta Mathematica · doi:10.1007/bf02391818 · Cited by 294
Geometric phase, bundle classification, and group representation
Mostafazadeh, A. (1996) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.531457 · Cited by 16
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- E. Demler, S.C. Zhang, LANL e-print archive cond-mat/9805404. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 988
Exact solutions of holonomic quantum computation
Tanimura, S., Hayashi, D., & Nakahara, M. (2004) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2004.03.057 · Cited by 16
Scheme for fault-tolerant holonomic computation on stabilizer codes
Oreshkov, O., Brun, T. A., & Lidar, D. A. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.022325 · Cited by 16
BASIC PROPERTIES OF COHERENT AND GENERALIZED COHERENT OPERATORS REVISITED
Fujii, K. (2001) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732301004492 · Cited by 16
Cheon’s anholonomies in Floquet operators
Miyamoto, M., & Tanaka, A. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042115 · Cited by 16
SPIN NETWORK SETTING OF TOPOLOGICAL QUANTUM COMPUTATION
Marzuoli, A., & Rasetti, M. (2004) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749905000499 · Cited by 16
Self-citationGeometric quantum computation on solid-state qubits
Choi, M. (2003) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/15/46/001 · Cited by 16
Viotti, L., Lombardo, F. C., & Villar, P. I. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.022218 · Cited by 15
Bertlmann, R. A., & Friis, N. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199683338.001.0001 · Cited by 19
Ultrafast Holonomic Quantum Gates
Shen, P., Chen, T., & Xue, Z. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.044004 · Cited by 15
Unidirectional acoustic metamaterials based on nonadiabatic holonomic quantum transformations
Wu, J., Tang, S., Wang, Y., Wang, X., Han, J., Lü, C., Song, J., Su, S., Xia, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2021) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-021-1810-6 · Cited by 15
Decoherence-suppressed nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation
Liu, B.-J., Yan, L.-L., Zhang, Y., Yung, M., Su, S., & Shan, C. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.013059 · Cited by 15
Fault-tolerant holonomic quantum computation in surface codes
Zheng, Y.-C., & Brun, T. A. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.022302 · Cited by 15
HQC with the AC setup associated with topological defects
Bakke, K., & Furtado, C. (2011) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic11.5-6-6 · Cited by 15
Error suppression for Hamiltonian quantum computing in Markovian environments
Marvian, M., & Lidar, D. A. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.032302 · Cited by 16
Rydberg-atom-based electrometry
Wei, H., Zhen-Tao, L., Yan-Xiong, D., Yan, H., & Zhu, S.-L. (2015) · Acta Physica Sinica · doi:10.7498/aps.64.160702 · Cited by 15
Error-resistant distributed quantum computation in a trapped ion chain
Braungardt, S., Sen, A., Sen, U., & Lewenstein, M. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042307 · Cited by 17
Cavity-QED-based unconventional geometric phase gates with bichromatic field modes
Joshi, A., & Xiao, M. (2006) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2006.06.081 · Cited by 15
Ground-state geometric quantum computing in superconducting systems
Solinas, P., Pirkkalainen, J.-M., & Möttönen, M. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.052304 · Cited by 14
Quantum entangling power of adiabatically connected Hamiltonians
Hamma, A., & Zanardi, P. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.062319 · Cited by 14
Robustness of the geometric phase under parametric noise
Lupo, C., & Aniello, P. (2009) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/79/06/065012 · Cited by 14
Yun, M.-R., Guo, F.-Q., Li, M., Yan, L.-L., Feng, M., Li, Y.-X., & Su, S. (2021) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.418626 · Cited by 14
Accelerated super-robust nonadiabatic holonomic quantum gates
Shen, P., Liang, Y., Chen, T., & Xue, Z. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.032601 · Cited by 14
Degenerate eigensubspace in a triangle-level system and its geometric quantum control
Du, Y.-X., Liu, B.-J., Lv, Q.-X., Zhang, X.-D., Yan, H., & Zhu, S.-L. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.012333 · Cited by 14
Experimental realization of noise-induced adiabaticity in nuclear magnetic resonance
Wang, B.-X., Xin, T., Kong, X., Wei, S.-J., Ruan, D., & Long, G. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.042345 · Cited by 14
Superconducting qubit circuit emulation of a vector spin-1/2
Kerman, A. J. (2019) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab2ee7 · Cited by 15
Geometric phase of a two-level system in a dissipative environment
Fujikawa, K., & Hu, M.-G. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.052107 · Cited by 14
Measuring the Aharonov–Anandan phase in multiport photonic systems
Wang, K., Weimann, S., Nolte, S., Perez-Leija, A., & Szameit, A. (2016) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.41.001889 · Cited by 14
Akulin, V. M., Gershkovich, V., & Harel, G. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.012308 · Cited by 14
Robust charge-based qubit encoding
Oi, D. K. L., Schirmer, S. G., Greentree, A. D., & Stace, T. M. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.075348 · Cited by 14
A geometrical approach to quantum holonomic computing algorithms
Самойленко, А. М., Prykarpatsky, Y. A., Taneri, U., Prykarpatsky, A. K., & Blackmore, D. (2004) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2004.01.017 · Cited by 14
Mathematical foundations of holonomic quantum computer
Fujii, K. (2001) · Reports on Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/s0034-4877(01)80066-5 · Cited by 14
Nonadiabatic Holonomic Quantum Computation Based on Rydberg Ground State Blockade
Su, S., 王, C. 琛. W., 宋, P.-Y. 佩. S., & 陈, G. 刚. C. (2024) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/41/4/040302 · Cited by 13
Topological Quantum Gates in Homotopy Type Theory
Myers, D. J., Sati, H., & Schreiber, U. (2024) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-024-05020-8 · Cited by 23
Vacuum-induced Berry phase beyond the rotating-wave approximation
Liu, T., Feng, M., & Wang, K. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.062109 · Cited by 13
Non-Abelian phases from quantum Zeno dynamics
Burgarth, D. K., Paolo Facchi, A., Giovannetti, V., Nakazato, H., Pascazio, S., & Yuasa, K. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.042107 · Cited by 13
Entanglement dynamics via geometric phases in quantum spin chains
Castro, C. S., & Sarandy, M. S. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.042334 · Cited by 13
Memory-induced geometric phase in non-Markovian open systems
Luo, D.-W., You, J. Q., Lin, H.-Q., Wu, L.-A., & Yu, T. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.052117 · Cited by 13
Zheng, R., Kang, Y., Shi, Z., & Xia, Y. (2019) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201800447 · Cited by 13
Scalable nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation on a superconducting qubit lattice
Ji, L., Chen, T., & Xue, Z. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.062312 · Cited by 13
Nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation with shortened path on superconducting circuits
Ding, C.-Y., Liang, Y., Yu, K.-Z., & Xue, Z. (2021) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/5.0071569 · Cited by 13
Non-Adiabatic Universal Holonomic Quantum Gates Based on Abelian Holonomies
Güngördü, U., Wan, Y., & Nakahara, M. (2014) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.83.034001 · Cited by 13
THE QUANTUM TRAJECTORY APPROACH TO GEOMETRIC PHASE FOR OPEN SYSTEMS
Carollo, A. C. M. (2005) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732305017718 · Cited by 13
Geometric phases and quantum computations
Shalyt-Margolin, A., Стражев, В. И., & Tregubovich, A. Y. (2002) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(02)01230-6 · Cited by 13
Weyl disks: Theoretical prediction
Erdmanis, J., Lukács, Á., & Nazarov, Y. V. (2018) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.241105 · Cited by 14
Exotic quantum holonomy in Hamiltonian systems
Cheon, T., Tanaka, A., & Kim, S. (2009) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2009.10.064 · Cited by 13
Feedback control on geometric phase in dissipative two-level systems
Sun, H. Y., Shu, P. L., Li, C., & Yi, X. X. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.022119 · Cited by 13
Control aspects of holonomic quantum computation
Lucarelli, D. (2005) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1888028 · Cited by 13
Alternative scheme for a two-qubit conditional phase gate by adiabatic passage under dissipation
Deng, Z. J., Gao, K., & Feng, M. (2007) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/40/2/008 · Cited by 13
Berry phase in an anti-PT symmetric metal-semiconductor complex system
Lü, B., Liu, X., Gao, Y., Cao, C., Wang, T.-J., & Wang, C. X. (2019) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.27.022237 · Cited by 13
Concurrence Vectors for Entanglement of High-dimensional Systems
Li, Y. Q., & Zhu, G. Q. (2003) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 13
Mathematical Structure of Rabi Oscillations in the Strong Coupling RegimePreprint
Fujii, K. (2002) · Cited by 13
Two-Qubit Geometric Gates Based on Ground-State Blockade of Rydberg Atoms
Xu, J.-Z., Sun, L.-N., Wei, J.-F., Du, Y.-X., Luo, R., Yan, L.-L., Feng, M., & Su, S. (2022) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/39/9/090301 · Cited by 12
Designing dynamically corrected gates robust to multiple noise sources using geometric space curves
Nelson, H. T., Piliouras, E., Connelly, K., & Barnes, E. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.012407 · Cited by 14
Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation based on a commutation relation
Zhao, P. Z., & Tong, D. M. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.012619 · Cited by 12
Nonadiabatic geometric quantum gates by composite pulses based on superconducting qubits
Fang, Z.-Y., Xu, H. L., Chen, T., Wei, K., & Zhang, C. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.042615 · Cited by 12
Inducing and detecting geometric phases with superconducting quantum circuits
Feng, Z., & Yan, R. (2013) · Physica C Superconductivity · doi:10.1016/j.physc.2013.06.011 · Cited by 12
Observable Berry Phase for Charge Qubit in a Dissipative Environment
Wang, Z., Li, Y., Xu, H., Hu, L., Nie, Y.-Y., Guo, L., Huang, M., & Pan, H. (2012) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-012-1159-x · Cited by 12
Quantum Optimal Control: Practical Aspects and Diverse Methods
Mahesh, T. S., Batra, P., & Ram, M. H. (2022) · Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · doi:10.1007/s41745-022-00311-2 · Cited by 12
Conditions for Equivalent Noise Sensitivity of Geometric and Dynamical Quantum Gates
Colmenar, R. K., Güngördü, U., & Kestner, J. P. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.030310 · Cited by 12
Holonomic gates in pseudo-Hermitian quantum systems
Pinske, J., Teuber, L., & Scheel, S. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.042316 · Cited by 12
Liu, B., Guo, F.-Q., Yan, L.-L., Zhang, S., Feng, M., & Su, S. (2021) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202100093 · Cited by 12
A general treatment of geometric phases and dynamical invariants
Duzzioni, E. I., Serra, R. M., & Moussa, M. H. Y. (2008) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/82/20007 · Cited by 12
Laing, A., Lawson, T., López, E. M., & O’Brien, J. L. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.260505 · Cited by 12
Environmental noise reduction for holonomic quantum gates
Parodi, D., Sassetti, M., Solinas, P., & Zanghı̀, N. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.012337 · Cited by 12
Josephson nanocircuit in the presence of linear quantum noise
Paladino, E., Taddei, F., Giaquinta, G., & Falci, G. (2003) · Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures · doi:10.1016/s1386-9477(02)00948-7 · Cited by 12
Unification of the family of Garrison-Wright's phases
Cui, X., & Zheng, Y. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep05813 · Cited by 12
Geometric quantization of time-dependent completely integrable Hamiltonian systems
Fiorani, E., GIACHETTA, G., & Sardanashvily, G. A. (2002) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1502927 · Cited by 12
Bifurcations of the geometric phase of a qubit asymmetrically coupled to the environment
Dajka, J., & Łuczka, J. (2008) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/44/442001 · Cited by 12
Time-optimal holonomic quantum computation
Alves, G. O. (2022) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 13
Universal robust geometric quantum control via geometric trajectory correction
Chen, T., Hu, J., Zhang, C., & Xue, Z. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.014060 · Cited by 11
Coherent control with user-defined passage
Liu, B.-J., & Yung, M.-H. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abd5ca · Cited by 11
State-Independent Nonadiabatic Geometric Quantum Gates
Liang, Y., Shen, P., Ji, L., & Xue, Z. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.19.024051 · Cited by 11
Evolution Operator Can Always Be Separated into the Product of Holonomy and Dynamic Operators
Yu, X., & Tong, D. M. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.200202 · Cited by 11
A geometric framework for mixed quantum states based on a Kähler structure
Heydari, H. (2015) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/48/25/255301 · Cited by 11
Zheng, Y.-C., & Brun, T. A. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.032317 · Cited by 11
Optical rotation of heavy hole spins by non-Abelian geometrical means
Sun, H., Feng, X., Wu, C., Liu, J., Gong, S., & Oh, C. H. (2009) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.235404 · Cited by 11
Geometric phase for a driven quantum field subject to decoherence
Zheng, S. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.052117 · Cited by 11
Realization of universal nonadiabatic geometric control on decoherence-free qubits in the XY model
Mousolou, V. A. (2018) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/121/20004 · Cited by 11
Stojanović, V. M. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.012345 · Cited by 11
Leakage Suppression for Holonomic Quantum Gates
Liu, B.-J., & Yung, M. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.14.034003 · Cited by 11
Lapa, M. F., Cheng, M., & Wang, Y. (2021) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.11.5.086 · Cited by 11
Realization of a holonomic quantum computer in a chain of three-level systems
Gürkan, Z. N., & Sjöqvist, E. (2015) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2015.10.015 · Cited by 11
Geometric phase in a Bose-Einstein-Josephson junction
Balakrishnan, R., & Mehta, M. (2005) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2005-00071-3 · Cited by 11
Geometric manipulation of ensembles of atoms on an atom chip for quantum computation
Zheng, Y.-C., & Brun, T. A. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.032323 · Cited by 11
On Geometric Phases for Quantum Trajectories
Sjöqvist, E. (2006) · Acta Physica Hungarica A) Heavy Ion Physics · doi:10.1556/aph.26.2006.1-2.23 · Cited by 11
Universal Quantum Gates Based on Both Geometric and Dynamic Phases in Quantum Dots
Yang, K., Zhu, S.-L., & Zi-Dan, W. (2003) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/20/7/306 · Cited by 11
More on Optical Holonomic Quantum ComputerPreprint
Fujii, K. (2000) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0005129 · Cited by 11
Measuring geometric phases of scattering states in nanoscale electronic devices
Zhou, H.-Q., Lundin, U., Cho, S. Y., & McKenzie, R. H. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.113308 · Cited by 11
Nonadiabatic Geometric Phases Induced by Master Equation in Open Quantum System
Wang, Z. S. (2012) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-012-1251-2 · Cited by 10
Invariant-based inverse engineering for fast nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation
Li, W. (2021) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac12df · Cited by 10
Nonadiabatic Holonomic Quantum Computation via Path Optimization
Ji, L., Liang, Y., Shen, P., & Xue, Z. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.044034 · Cited by 10
Chancellor, N., & Haas, S. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.042321 · Cited by 10
Vacuum-induced Berry phases in single-mode Jaynes-Cummings models
Liu, Y., Wei, L. F., Jia, W. Z., & Liang, J.-Q. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.045801 · Cited by 10
Measuring Berry curvature with quantum Monte Carlo
Kolodrubetz, M. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.045107 · Cited by 10
Symmetry-protected adiabatic quantum transistors
Williamson, D. J., & Bartlett, S. D. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/5/053019 · Cited by 11
Geometric entangling gates for coupled cavity system in decoherence-free subspaces
Chen, Y.-Y., Feng, X., & Oh, C. H. (2012) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2012.08.008 · Cited by 10
Secular master equation for adiabatically driven time-dependent systems
Kamleitner, I. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.042111 · Cited by 10
Shortcuts to adiabaticity in cutting a spin chain
Ren, F.-H., Wang, Z.-M., & Gu, Y. (2016) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2016.10.041 · Cited by 10
Kang, Y., Chen, Y., Shi, Z., Huang, B., Song, J., & Xia, Y. (2019) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201800427 · Cited by 10
Avoiding Loss of Fidelity for Universal Entangling Geometric Quantum Gate
Chen, Z., Wang, J. Q., Li, X. L., Ji, Y., Zhang, B., Jiang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2009) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-009-0082-2 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Zanardi, P., & Rasetti, M.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Torino (IT)
- Venue
- Physics Letters A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 264
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 94-99
- ISSN
- 0375-9601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025206681
- Cited by
- 1,006
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 21.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physics Letters A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- holonomic quantum computation, Berry phase, non-Abelian holonomy, adiabatic evolution, control field, universal quantum computation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
