The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Holonomic quantum computation
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, since the SU(2) gauge field description is valid for photons down to quantum scale, this approach might be applicable to the design of geometric gates for realizing non-Abelian holonomic quantum computation64,65 with photons.”
From Non-Abelian gauge field optics (2019) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“The Davies approach is based not on the highT limit, but rather on the physically plausible idea of weak coupling. This is natural and consistent with thermodynamics at all temperatures.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“In the Davies approach the Markov approximation is a consequence of weak coupling (and hence slow dynamics of the system in the interaction picture), and time coarse-graining, which leads to cancellation of the non-Markovian oscillating terms.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“The price we pay is the invalidity of this approach for timedependent Hamiltonians, except in the adiabatic case.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“More specifically, Davies' derivation does not invoke a flatness condition on G ( ω ) but is, of course, still subject to the KMS condition.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“Hence, while the Davies approach does not require the highT limit, it imposes severe restrictions on the speed of quantum gates.”
From Internal consistency of fault-tolerant quantum error correction in light of rigorous derivations of the quantum Markovian limit (2006) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Appearance of Gauge Structure in Simple Dynamical Systems
Wilczek, F., & Zee, A. (1984) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.2111 · Cited by 1,775
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.255 · Cited by 1,651
Geometry, Topology and Physics
Nakahara, M. (1990) · doi:10.1887/0750306068 · Cited by 1,620
Wilczek, F. A., & Shapere, A. D. (1989) · Advanced series in mathematical physics · doi:10.1142/0613 · Cited by 1,616
Steane, A. (1998) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/61/2/002 · Cited by 1,391
Two-bit gates are universal for quantum computation
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.51.1015 · Cited by 1,069
Almost Any Quantum Logic Gate is Universal
Lloyd, S. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.346 · Cited by 690
Universality in quantum computation
Deutsch, D. E., Barenco, A., & Ekert, A. (1995) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1995.0065 · Cited by 346
Hermitian vector bundles and the equidistribution of the zeroes of their holomorphic sections
Bott, R., & Chern, S.-S. (1965) · Acta Mathematica · doi:10.1007/bf02391818 · Cited by 294
Geometric phase, bundle classification, and group representation
Mostafazadeh, A. (1996) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.531457 · Cited by 16
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- E. Demler, S.C. Zhang, LANL e-print archive cond-mat/9805404. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 988
GEOMETRIC PHASES AND QUANTUM PHASE TRANSITIONS
Zhu, S.-L. (2008) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979208038855 · Cited by 42
Quantum Computation with Unknown Parameters
García‐Ripoll, J. J., & Cirac, J. I. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.127902 · Cited by 41
Berry and Pancharatnam topological phases of atomic and optical systems
Ben-Aryeh, Y. (2004) · Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/6/4/r01 · Cited by 40
Geometry, robustness, and emerging unitarity in dissipation-projected dynamics
Zanardi, P., & Venuti, L. C. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.052324 · Cited by 43
Decoherence of adiabatically steered quantum systems
Solinas, P., Möttönen, M., Salmilehto, J., & Pekola, J. P. (2010) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.134517 · Cited by 40
High-fidelity geometric gate for silicon-based spin qubits
Zhang, C., Chen, T., Li, S., Wang, X., & Xue, Z. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.052302 · Cited by 40
State Preparation on Quantum Computers via Quantum Steering
Volya, D., & Mishra, P. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2024.3358193 · Cited by 40
Non-Abelian Superconducting Pumps
Brosco, V., Fazio, R., Hekking, F. W. J., & Joye, A. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.027002 · Cited by 40
Pyshkin, P. V., Luo, D.-W., Jing, J., You, J. Q., & Wu, L.-A. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep37781 · Cited by 41
Geometric phase for open quantum systems and stochastic unravelings
Bassi, A., & Ippoliti, E. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.062104 · Cited by 40
Quantum holonomies based on the Lorentz-violating tensor background
Bakke, K., & Belich, H. (2013) · Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/40/6/065002 · Cited by 39
Geometric phase in open systems: Beyond the Markov approximation and weak-coupling limit
Yi, X. X., Tong, D. M., Wang, L. C., Kwek, L. C., & Oh, C. H. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.052103 · Cited by 39
Environment-Assisted Holonomic Quantum Maps
Ramberg, N., & Sjöqvist, E. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.140501 · Cited by 38
Dynamically corrected gates from geometric space curves
Barnes, E., Calderon-Vargas, F. A., Dong, W., Li, B., Zeng, J., & Zhuang, F. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac4421 · Cited by 39
Non-Markovian effect on the geometric phase of a dissipative qubit
Chen, J., An, J., Tong, Q., Luo, H., & Oh, C. H. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.022120 · Cited by 38
Decoherence-free dynamical and geometrical entangling phase gates
Pachos, J. K., & Beige, A. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.033817 · Cited by 38
A Kaluza–Klein description of geometric phases in graphene
Bakke, K., Petrov, A. Y., & Furtado, C. (2012) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2012.08.005 · Cited by 38
Non-Abelian holonomic transformation in the presence of classical noise
Jing, J., Lam, C., & Wu, L.-A. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.012334 · Cited by 38
Quantum gates with controlled adiabatic evolutions
Hen, I. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.022309 · Cited by 37
Nonadiabatic holonomic multiqubit controlled gates
Zhao, P. Z., Xu, G., & Tong, D. M. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.052309 · Cited by 37
Validity of the rotating-wave approximation in nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation
Spiegelberg, J., & Sjöqvist, E. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.054301 · Cited by 37
Ai, M.-Z., Li, S., He, R., Xue, Z., Cui, J., Huang, Y., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2021) · Fundamental Research · doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2021.11.031 · Cited by 36
Hamiltonian open quantum system toolkit
Chen, H., & Lidar, D. A. (2022) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-022-00887-2 · Cited by 36
Quantum holonomies for an electric dipole moment
Bakke, K., & Furtado, C. (2011) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2011.09.050 · Cited by 36
Geometric phases induced in auxiliary qubits by many-body systems near their critical points
Yi, X. X., & Wang, W. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.032103 · Cited by 36
Entanglement and Density Matrix of a Block of Spins in AKLT ModelPreprint
Xu, Y., Katsura, H., Hirano, T., & Korepin, V. E. (2012) · Cited by 36
Shortcuts to adiabaticity for open systems in circuit quantum electrodynamics
Yin, Z., Li, C., Allcock, J., Zheng, Y.-C., Gu, X. Q., Dai, M., Zhang, S., & An, S. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27900-6 · Cited by 37
Geometric phase and quantum phase transition in an inhomogeneous periodic XY spin- 12 model
Ma, Y.-Q., & Chen, S. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.022116 · Cited by 35
Fidelity optimization for holonomic quantum gates in dissipative environments
Parodi, D., Sassetti, M., Solinas, P., Paolo Zanardi, A., & Zanghı̀, N. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.052304 · Cited by 35
From quantum circuits to adiabatic algorithms
Siu, M. S. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.062314 · Cited by 35
Quantum adiabatic search with decoherence in the instantaneous energy eigenbasis
Åberg, J., Kult, D., & Sjöqvist, E. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.042317 · Cited by 35
GEOMETRIC PHASES IN QUANTUM THEORY
Wien, A. (2002) · Cited by 34
Three-dimensional non-Abelian quantum holonomy
Neef, V., Pinske, J., Klauck, F., Teuber, L., Kremer, M., Ehrhardt, M., Heinrich, M., Scheel, S., & Szameit, A. (2022) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01807-5 · Cited by 35
One-component dynamical equation and noise-induced adiabaticity
Jing, J., Wu, L.-A., Yu, T., You, J. Q., Wang, Z.-M., & Garcia, L. C. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.032110 · Cited by 34
Geometric phase magnetometry using a solid-state spin
Arai, K., Lee, J., Belthangady, C., Glenn, D. R., Zhang, H., & Walsworth, R. L. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07489-z · Cited by 35
Note on coherent states and adiabatic connections, curvatures
Fujii, K. (2000) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.533350 · Cited by 34
Evaluation of Holonomic Quantum Computation: Adiabatic Versus Nonadiabatic
Cen, L.-X., Li, X.-Q., Yan, Y., Zheng, H., & Wang, S.-J. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.147902 · Cited by 34
Geometric phase in dephasing systems
Yi, X. X., Wang, L. C., & Wang, W. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.044101 · Cited by 34
Electric nonadiabatic geometric entangling gates on spin qubits
Mousolou, V. A. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.012307 · Cited by 33
Nonadiabatic holonomic three-qubit controlled gates realized by one-shot implementation
Xing, T., Wu, X., & Xu, G. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.012306 · Cited by 33
SpinQ Gemini: a desktop quantum computing platform for education and research
Hou, S., Feng, G., Wu, Z., Zou, H., Shi, W., Zeng, J., Cao, C., Yü, S., Sheng, Z., Rao, X., et al. (2021) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-021-00109-8 · Cited by 38
Geometry of Quantum Computation with Qudits
Luo, M.-X., Chen, X., Yang, Y., & Wang, X. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep04044 · Cited by 33
Super-robust nonadiabatic geometric quantum control
Liu, B.-J., Wang, Y.-S., & Yung, M. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.l032066 · Cited by 33
General setting for a geometric phase of mixed states under an arbitrary nonunitary evolution
Rezakhani, A. T., & Zanardi, P. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.012107 · Cited by 33
Dynamical-decoupling-protected nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation
Zhao, P. Z., Wu, X., & Tong, D. M. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.012205 · Cited by 32
Nematic bits and universal logic gates
Kos, Ž., & Dunkel, J. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abp8371 · Cited by 32
Composite Short-Path Nonadiabatic Holonomic Quantum Gates
Liang, Y., Shen, P., Chen, T., & Xue, Z. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.17.034015 · Cited by 32
Temperature effects on mixed-state geometric phase
Rezakhani, A. T., & Zanardi, P. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.052117 · Cited by 32
Kremer, M., Teuber, L., Szameit, A., & Scheel, S. (2019) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.1.033117 · Cited by 31
Setiawan, F., Groszkowski, P., Ribeiro, H., & Clerk, A. A. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030306 · Cited by 31
Complete Unitary Qutrit Control in Ultracold Atoms
Lindon, J., Tashchilina, A., Cooke, L., & LeBlanc, L. J. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.19.034089 · Cited by 31
Menzel-Jones, C., & Shapiro, M. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.052308 · Cited by 31
Noncyclic geometric quantum computation
Friedenauer, A., & Sjöqvist, E. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.024303 · Cited by 31
Generalized Ramsey interferometry explored with a single nuclear spin qudit
Godfrin, C., Ballou, R., Bonet, E., Ruben, M., Klyatskaya, S., Wernsdorfer, W., & Balestro, F. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0101-3 · Cited by 31
Non-Abelian geometric quantum memory with an atomic ensemble
Li, Y., Zhang, P., Paolo Zanardi, A., & Sun, C. P. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.032330 · Cited by 31
Exchange gate on the qudit space and Fock space
Fujii, K. (2003) · Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/5/6/011 · Cited by 31
Geometric aspects of composite pulses
Ichikawa, T., Bando, M., Kondo, Y., & Nakahara, M. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0358 · Cited by 30
Robust paths to realize nonadiabatic holonomic gates
Xu, G. F., Zhao, P. Z., Tong, D. M., & Sjöqvist, E. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.052349 · Cited by 30
Demonstration of a non-Abelian geometric controlled-NOT gate in a superconducting circuit
Xu, K., Ning, W., Huang, X.-J., Han, P.-R., Li, H., Yang, Z.-B., Zheng, D., Fan, H., & Zheng, S.-B. (2021) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.416264 · Cited by 32
Guo, F.-Q., Wu, J., Zhu, X., Jin, Z., Zeng, Y., Zhang, S., Yan, L.-L., Feng, M., & Su, S. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.062410 · Cited by 30
Dynamically Corrected Nonadiabatic Holonomic Quantum Gates
Li, S., & Xue, Z. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.044005 · Cited by 30
ERCOLESSI, E., MARMO, G., MORANDI, G., & MUKUNDA, N. (2001) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x01005870 · Cited by 30
Scalar Aharonov‐Bohm effect in the presence of a topological defect
Bakke, K., & Furtado, C. (2010) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201000043 · Cited by 30
ENTANGLEMENT IN VALENCE-BOND-SOLID STATES
Korepin, V. E., & XU, Y. (2010) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979210055676 · Cited by 31
Exact Nonadiabatic Holonomic Transformations of Spin-Orbit Qubits
Čadež, T., Jefferson, J. H., & Ramšak, A. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.150402 · Cited by 30
One-qubit quantum gates associated with topological defects in solids
Bakke, K., & Furtado, C. (2012) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-012-0358-y · Cited by 30
Tanimura, S., Nakahara, M., & Hayashi, D. (2005) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1835545 · Cited by 30
Rabi- and Blockade-Error-Resilient All-Geometric Rydberg Quantum Gates
Su, S., Sun, L.-N., Liu, B.-J., Yan, L.-L., Yung, M., Li, W., & Feng, M. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.19.044007 · Cited by 29
Eigenstate tracking in open quantum systems
Jing, J., Sarandy, M. S., Lidar, D. A., Luo, D.-W., & Wu, L.-A. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.042131 · Cited by 30
Vepsäläinen, A. P., & Paraoanu, G. S. (2020) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.201900121 · Cited by 29
Geometric quantum gates with superconducting qubits
Kamleitner, I., Solinas, P., Müller, C., Shnirman, A., & Möttönen, M. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.83.214518 · Cited by 29
Implementation of holonomic quantum computation through engineering and manipulating the environment
Yin, Z., Li, F., & Peng, P. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.062311 · Cited by 29
Entanglement and Density Matrix of a Block of Spins in AKLT Model
Xu, Y., Katsura, H., Hirano, T., & Korepin, V. E. (2008) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10955-008-9617-9 · Cited by 30
Arbitrary quantum state engineering in three-state systems via Counterdiabatic driving
Chen, Y., Wu, Q., Huang, B., Song, J., & Xia, Y. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep38484 · Cited by 29
Superrobust Geometric Control of a Superconducting Circuit
Li, S., Liu, B.-J., Ni, Z., Zhang, L., Xue, Z., Li, J., Yan, F., Chen, Y., Liu, S., Yung, M., et al. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.064003 · Cited by 29
Realization of arbitrary gates in holonomic quantum computation
Niskanen, A. O., Nakahara, M., & Salomaa, M. M. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.012319 · Cited by 29
Quasienergy Anholonomy and its Application to Adiabatic Quantum State Manipulation
Tanaka, A., & Miyamoto, M. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.160407 · Cited by 28
Geometric spin echo under zero field
Sekiguchi, Y., Komura, Y., Mishima, S., Tanaka, T., Niikura, N., & Kosaka, H. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11668 · Cited by 30
Dynamical invariants and nonadiabatic geometric phases in open quantum systems
Sarandy, M. S., Duzzioni, E. I., & Moussa, M. H. Y. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.052112 · Cited by 28
Universal quantum computation by holonomic and nonlocal gates with imperfections
Ellinas, D., & Pachos, J. K. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.022310 · Cited by 28
Heralded nonlocal quantum gates for distributed quantum computation in a decoherence-free subspace
Su, W., Qin, W., Miranowicz, A., Li, T., & Nori, F. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.052612 · Cited by 27
Topological phases in adiabatic and nonadiabatic driven systems
Gómez-León, Á., & Platero, G. (2012) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.115318 · Cited by 27
Janzing, D. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.012307 · Cited by 28
Designing robust unitary gates: Application to concatenated composite pulses
Ichikawa, T., Bando, M., Kondo, Y., & Nakahara, M. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.062311 · Cited by 27
Geometric phase as a determinant of a qubit– environment coupling
Dajka, J., Łuczka, J., & Peter Hänggi, A. (2010) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-010-0178-x · Cited by 27
Wang, L., Tu, T., Gong, B., Zhou, C. J., & Guo, G. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep19048 · Cited by 27
Stability of holonomic quantum computations
Кувшинов, В. И., & Kuzmin, A. V. (2003) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2003.08.011 · Cited by 27
Topological features in ion-trap holonomic computation
Pachos, J. K. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.042318 · Cited by 28
Correction to the geometric phase by structured environments: The onset of non-Markovian effects
Lombardo, F. C., & Villar, P. I. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.042111 · Cited by 27
Concatenated Composite Pulses Compensating Simultaneous Systematic ErrorsPreprint
Bando, M., Ichikawa, T., Kondo, Y., & Nakahara, M. (2016) · Cited by 27
Information processing at the speed of light
AbuGhanem, M. (2024) · Frontiers of Optoelectronics · doi:10.1007/s12200-024-00133-3 · Cited by 31
Wu, J., & Su, S. (2019) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab2a92 · Cited by 26
Geometric Phase in Fluctuating Magnetic Field
Wang, Z. S. (2009) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-009-0024-z · Cited by 26
Geometric phase in supersymmetric quantum mechanics
Pedder, C., Sonner, J., & Tong, D. (2008) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.025009 · Cited by 26
Adiabatic cluster-state quantum computing
Bacon, D., & Flammia, S. T. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.030303 · Cited by 26
Ultrafast adiabatic quantum algorithm for the NP-complete exact cover problem
Wang, H., & Wu, L.-A. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep22307 · Cited by 27
Measurement of a vacuum-induced geometric phase
Gasparinetti, S., Berger, S., Abdumalikov, A. A., Pechal, M., Filipp, S., & Wallraff, A. J. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501732 · Cited by 26
Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation on coupled transmons with ancillaries
Chen, T., Zhang, J., & Xue, Z. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.052314 · Cited by 26
Path-optimized nonadiabatic geometric quantum computation on superconducting qubits
Ding, C.-Y., Ji, L., Chen, T., & Xue, Z. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac3621 · Cited by 26
Yang, S., & Hwang, N. Y. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.125330 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Zanardi, P., & Rasetti, M.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Torino (IT)
- Venue
- Physics Letters A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 264
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 94-99
- ISSN
- 0375-9601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025206681
- Cited by
- 1,006
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 21.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physics Letters A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- holonomic quantum computation, Berry phase, non-Abelian holonomy, adiabatic evolution, control field, universal quantum computation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
