Cited by 218Team Dynamics and PerformanceInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Groups perform better than the best individuals on Letters-to-Numbers problems

Laughlin, Patrick R., Bonner, Bryan L., Miner, Andrew G.·2002·Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

DOI 10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00003-1

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00003-1

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Handbook of Social Psychology
DeLamater, J., & Ward, A. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,590
Human Problem Solving.
Axten, N., Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2063712 · Cited by 6,886
Protostars and Planets VI
Mannings, V., Boss, A., & Russell, S. (2000) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6299 · Cited by 3,354
Groups: Interaction and Performance.
Polley, R. B., & McGrath, J. E. (1984) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393041 · Cited by 3,268
Group process and productivity
Steiner, I. D. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,106
Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.211 · Cited by 2,094
The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.
Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43 · Cited by 1,428
Group Tasks, Group Interaction Process, and Group Performance Effectiveness: A Review and Proposed Integration
Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60248-8 · Cited by 1,346
Group process and productivity
Washburn, P. V. (1973) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · Cited by 869
Progress in social psychology
Fishbein, M. (1980) · Lawrence Erlbaum Associates eBooks · Cited by 760

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

Hastie, 1986, Review essay: Experimental evidence on group accuracy, 129
Kerr, 1996, “When are N heads better (or worse) than one?”: Biased judgment in individuals versus groups. Consensual action by small groups, vol. 1, 105
Levine, 1998, Small groups, Vol. 2, 415
Stasser, 2001, Collective choice, judgment and problem solving. Group processes, Vol. 3, 31

Sorted by citations

Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10000968 · Cited by 2,254
Group Performance and Decision Making
Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009 · Cited by 1,332
The Dirt on Coming Clean: Perverse Effects of Disclosing Conflicts of Interest
Cain, D. M., Loewenstein, G. F., & Moore, D. A. (2005) · The Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1086/426699 · Cited by 620
A Cognitive Load Approach to Collaborative Learning: United Brains for Complex Tasks
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9095-2 · Cited by 547
Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Effects of group size.
Laughlin, P. R., Hatch, E. C., Silver, J. S., & Boh, L. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.644 · Cited by 390
Self-citation
Dynamically Integrating Knowledge in Teams: Transforming Resources into Performance
Gardner, H. K., Gino, F., & Staats, B. R. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0604 · Cited by 381
Groups Make Better Self-Interested Decisions
Charness, G. B., & Sutter, M. (2012) · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.26.3.157 · Cited by 364
The development of collective efficacy in teams: A multilevel and longitudinal perspective.
Tasa, K., Taggar, S., & Seijts, G. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.17 · Cited by 335
Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation
Mercier, H., & Landemore, H. E. (2012) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00873.x · Cited by 318
Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency
Kirschner, F., PAAS, F. G. W. C., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.008 · Cited by 303
Design Heuristics in Engineering Concept Generation
Daly, S. R., Yılmaz, S., Christian, J. L., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2012) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01121.x · Cited by 251
Task complexity as a driver for collaborative learning efficiency: The collective working-memory effect
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1730 · Cited by 219
Creativity in innovative projects: How teamwork matters
Hoegl, M., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2007) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.01.008 · Cited by 213
Marketing activity, blogging and sales
Onishi, H., & Manchanda, P. (2012) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.11.003 · Cited by 215
Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds
Navajas, J., Niella, T., Garbulsky, G., Bahrami, B., & Sigman, M. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0273-4 · Cited by 206
Group Behavior and Performance
Hackman, J. R., & Katz, N. R. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002032 · Cited by 187
Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches
Janssen, J., Kirschner, F., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Paas, F. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9131-x · Cited by 180
TARGET ARTICLE: Basic Social Influence Is Underestimated
Cialdini, R. B. (2005) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1604_03 · Cited by 157
Why does peer instruction benefit student learning?
Tullis, J. G., & Goldstone, R. L. (2020) · Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-020-00218-5 · Cited by 153
Can Groups Solve the Problem of Over-Bidding in Contests?
Sheremeta, R. M., & Zhang, J. (2009) · Social Choice and Welfare · doi:10.1007/s00355-009-0434-0 · Cited by 129
Repairing trust with individuals vs. groups
Kim, P. H., Cooper, C. D., Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2012) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.08.004 · Cited by 126
Beyond playing 20 questions with nature: Integrative experiment design in the social and behavioral sciences
Almaatouq, A., Griffiths, T. L., Suchow, J. W., Whiting, M. E., Evans, J., & Watts, D. J. (2022) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x22002874 · Cited by 134
Converging Cognitive Enhancements
Sandberg, A., & Bostrom, N. (2006) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1382.015 · Cited by 125
Are two heads better than one for software development? the productivity paradox of pair programming
Balijepally, V., Mahapatra, R., Nerur, S., & Price, K. H. (2009) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5555/2017410.2017418 · Cited by 118
Are Two Heads Better than One for Software Development? The Productivity Paradox of Pair Programming1
Balijepally, V., Mahapatra, R., Nerur, S., & Price (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650280 · Cited by 118
The effects of variability and expectations on utilization of member expertise and group performance
Baumann, M. R., & Bonner, B. L. (2004) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.12.004 · Cited by 112
Self-citation
Rational endorsement
Fleisher, W. (2017) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-017-0976-4 · Cited by 109
Effects of argumentation on group micro-creativity: Statistical discourse analyses of algebra students’ collaborative problem solving
Chiu, M. M. (2008) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.001 · Cited by 108
Task complexity moderates group synergy
Almaatouq, A., Alsobay, M., Yin, M., & Watts, D. J. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2101062118 · Cited by 104
Comparing Ideation Techniques for Beginning Designers
Daly, S. R., Seifert, C. M., Yılmaz, S., & Gonzalez, R. (2016) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4034087 · Cited by 103
Individual or team decision-making—Causes and consequences of self-selection
Kocher, M. G., Strauß, S., & Sutter, M. (2006) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2005.08.009 · Cited by 99
Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Informative equations and effective strategies.
Laughlin, P. R., Zander, M. L., Knievel, E. M., & Tan, T. K. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.684 · Cited by 95
Self-citation
Collective induction without cooperation? Learning and knowledge transfer in cooperative groups and competitive auctions.
Maciejovsky, B., & Budescu, D. V. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.854 · Cited by 91
Understanding reactions to job redesign: A quasi-experimental investigation of the moderating effects of organizational context on perceptions of performance behavior.
Morgeson, F. P., Johnson, M. D., Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Mumford, T. V. (2006) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00941.x · Cited by 98
Teams Make You Smarter: How Exposure to Teams Improves Individual Decisions in Probability and Reasoning Tasks
Maciejovsky, B., Sutter, M., Budescu, D. V., & Bernau, P. (2013) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1668 · Cited by 81
The effect of expertise on collaborative problem solving
Nokes‐Malach, T. J., Meade, M. L., & Morrow, D. G. (2012) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2011.642206 · Cited by 91
Many cheers make light the work: how social support triggers process gains in teams
Hüffmeier, J., & Hertel, G. (2011) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683941111112631 · Cited by 87
Beyond Idea Generation: The Power of Groups in Developing Ideas
McMahon, K., Ruggeri, A., Kämmer, J. E., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2016) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2016.1195637 · Cited by 82
The Collaboration Principle in Multimedia Learning
Jonassen, D. H., Lee, C. B., Yang, C.-C., & Laffey, J. M. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816819.017 · Cited by 72
HOW GROUPS REACH AGREEMENT IN RISKY CHOICES: AN EXPERIMENT
Zhang, J., & Casari, M. (2011) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00362.x · Cited by 67
Behavioural operational research: Towards a framework for understanding behaviour in OR interventions
White, L. (2015) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.032 · Cited by 65
Individual versus collaborative problem solving: divergent outcomes depending on task complexity
Sears, D. A., & Reagin, J. M. (2013) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9271-8 · Cited by 64
Neural decoding of collective wisdom with multi-brain computing
Eckstein, M. P., Das, K., Pham, B. T., Peterson, M., Abbey, C. K., Sy, J. L., & Giesbrecht, B. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.009 · Cited by 66
Collective choice, collaboration, and communication
Stasser, G., & Abele, S. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103211 · Cited by 60
Are Two Heads Better Than One in AI-Assisted Decision Making? Comparing the Behavior and Performance of Groups and Individuals in Human-AI Collaborative Recidivism Risk Assessment
Chiang, C.-W., Lu, Z., Li, Z., & Yin, M. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581015 · Cited by 72
Collaborative Brain-Computer Interface for Aiding Decision-Making
Poli, R., Valeriani, D., & Cinel, C. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102693 · Cited by 58
Synergetic effects in working teams
Hertel, G. (2011) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683941111112622 · Cited by 56
A balance theory approach to group problem solving
Adejumo, G., Duimering, P. R., & Zhong, Z. (2007) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2007.09.001 · Cited by 60
Computing Arm Movements with a Monkey Brainet
Ramakrishnan, A., Ifft, P. J., Pais-Vieira, M., Byun, Y. W., Zhuang, K. Z., Lebedev, M. A., & Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep10767 · Cited by 54
Group-level resistance to health mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic: A groupthink approach.
Forsyth, D. R. (2020) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/gdn0000132 · Cited by 55
Can experienced designers learn from new tools? A case study of idea generation in a professional engineering team
Yılmaz, S., Daly, S. R., Christian, J. L., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2013) · International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation · doi:10.1080/21650349.2013.832016 · Cited by 51
The Power of Diversity over Large Solution Spaces
LiCalzi, M., & Sürücü, O. (2012) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1495 · Cited by 50
Endorsement and assertion
Fleisher, W. (2019) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12315 · Cited by 49
Pursuit and inquisitive reasons
Fleisher, W. (2022) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.04.009 · Cited by 49
Distributed Cognition in Software Design: An Experimental Investigation of the Role of Design Patterns and Collaboration1
Mangalaraj, G., Nerur, S., Mahapatra, R., & Price, K. H. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.1.12 · Cited by 49
Gender Composition and Group Confidence Judgment: The Perils of All-Male Groups
Keck, S., & Tang, W. (2017) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2881 · Cited by 49
Wise teamwork: Collective confidence calibration predicts the effectiveness of group discussion
Silver, I., Mellers, B. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104157 · Cited by 47
Experts and laymen grossly underestimate the benefits of argumentation for reasoning
Mercier, H., Trouche, E., Yama, H., Heintz, C., & Girotto, V. (2014) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2014.981582 · Cited by 47
Group-to-Individual Problem-Solving Transfer
Laughlin, P. R., Carey, H. R., & Kerr, N. L. (2008) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430208090645 · Cited by 47
Self-citation
Who follows the crowd—Groups or individuals?
Fahr, R., & Irlenbusch, B. (2011) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.03.007 · Cited by 46
Group Augmentation in Realistic Visual-Search Decisions via a Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface
Valeriani, D., Cinel, C., & Poli, R. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08265-7 · Cited by 47
Expertise in Group Problem Solving: Recognition, Social Combination, and Performance.
Bonner, B. L. (2004) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.8.4.277 · Cited by 45
Self-citation
Enhancement of Group Perception via a Collaborative Brain–Computer Interface
Valeriani, D., Poli, R., & Cinel, C. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2016.2598875 · Cited by 45
Examining different types of collaborative learning in a complex computer-based environment: A cognitive load approach
Zhang, L., Ayres, P., & Chan, K. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.038 · Cited by 40
The behaviour of corporate actors: How much can we learn from the experimental literature?
Engel, C. (2010) · Journal of Institutional Economics · doi:10.1017/s1744137410000135 · Cited by 40
Group benefits in joint perceptual tasks—a review
Wahn, B., Kingstone, A. F., & Peter König, B. (2018) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13843 · Cited by 41
The Dirt on Coming Clean
Cain, D. M., Loewenstein, G. F., & Moore, D. A. (2007) · International Corporate Responsibility Series · doi:10.5840/icr200737 · Cited by 38
Group size and the trust, cohesion, and commitment of group members
Soboroff, S. D. (2012) · doi:10.17077/etd.0mzaq9pd · Cited by 37
More heads choose better than one: Group decision making can eliminate probability matching
Schulze, C., & Newell, B. R. (2015) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0949-6 · Cited by 38
The benefits of argumentation are cross-culturally robust: The case of Japan
Mercier, H., Deguchi, M., der Henst, J. V., & Yama, H. (2015) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2014.1002534 · Cited by 35
Markets as a structural solution to knowledge-sharing dilemmas
Maciejovsky, B., & Budescu, D. V. (2012) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.04.005 · Cited by 33
Decision Structure and the Problem of Scale in Deliberation
Pingree, R. J. (2006) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00268.x · Cited by 32
Individual versus group choices of repeated game strategies: A strategy method approach
Cason, T. N., & Mui, V. (2019) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2019.01.003 · Cited by 33
Group Size and Peer Learning: Peer Discussions in Different Group Size Influence Learning in a Biology Exercise Performed on a Tablet With Stylus
Corrégé, J.-B., & Michinov, N. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.733663 · Cited by 31
The Collaboration Principle in Multimedia Learning
Kirschner, P. A., Kirschner, F., & Janssen, J. J. H. M. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139547369.027 · Cited by 33
Team Players: How Social Skills Improve Group Performance
Weidmann, B., & Deming, D. J. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w27071 · Cited by 35
Comparing Collaborative and Cooperative Gameplay for Academic and Gaming Achievements
Baek, Y., & Touati, A. (2019) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633118825385 · Cited by 30
Complex Problem Solving after Unstructured Discussion: Effects of Information Distribution and Experience
Meyer, B. M., & Schöll, W. (2009) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430209105045 · Cited by 30
Investigating the impact of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) to help improve reading comprehension in low performing urban elementary schools
Vega, N., Stanfield, J., & Mitra, S. (2019) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-019-10023-3 · Cited by 34
Group decision-making in software architecture: A study on industrial practices
Smrithi Rekha, V., & Muccini, H. (2018) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2018.04.009 · Cited by 31
Toward a Group Facilitation Technique for Project Teams
Witte, E. H. (2007) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430207078694 · Cited by 29
Status, Faction Sizes, and Social Influence: Testing the Theoretical Mechanism
Melamed, D., & Savage, S. V. (2016) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/686943 · Cited by 27
Innovation in legal services: The practices that influence ideation and codification activities
Bourke, J., Roper, S., & Love, J. H. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.057 · Cited by 30
Efektivitas worked example dengan strategi pengelompokan siswa ditinjau dari kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan cognitive load
Irwansyah, M. F., & Retnowati, E. (2019) · Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika · doi:10.21831/jrpm.v6i1.21452 · Cited by 26
“Two Heads Are Better” Stands to Reason
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.336.6084.979-a · Cited by 26
Collective Action Control by Goals and Plans: Applying a Self-Regulation Perspective to Group Performance
Wieber, F., Thürmer, J. L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2012) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.125.3.0275 · Cited by 25
Should there be a romance between teams and groups?
Paulus, P. B., & van der Zee, K. I. (2004) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/0963179042596496 · Cited by 25
Comparing the effectiveness of peer instruction to individual learning during a chromatography course
Morice, J., Michinov, N., Delaval, M., Sideridou, A., & Ferrières, V. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12116 · Cited by 25
Performance similarities predict collective benefits in dyadic and triadic joint visual search
Wahn, B., Czeszumski, A., & Peter König, B. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191179 · Cited by 25
Centrality and Accuracy in Group Quantity Estimations.
Bonner, B. L., Gonzalez, C. M., & Sommer, D. (2004) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.8.3.155 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Agent‐Based Modeling of Collaborative Problem Solving
Bergner, Y., Andrews, J. J., Zhu, M., & Gonzales, J. E. (2016) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/ets2.12113 · Cited by 23
Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process
Marcoci, A., Vercammen, A., Bush, M., Hamilton, D. G., Hanea, A. M., Hemming, V., Wintle, B. C., Burgman, M. A., & Fidler, F. M. (2022) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/s13104-022-06016-0 · Cited by 24
Negotiating when outnumbered: Agenda strategies for bargaining with buying teams
Patton, C., & Balakrishnan, P. V. S. (2012) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.02.002 · Cited by 22
Are groups ‘less behavioral’? The case of anchoring
Meub, L., & Proeger, T. (2017) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-017-9608-x · Cited by 22
Investigating Impacts on the Ideation Flexibility of Engineers
Yılmaz, S., Jablokow, K., Daly, S. R., Silk, E., & Berg, M. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--20711 · Cited by 21
Improving decision-making based on visual perception via a collaborative brain-computer interface
Poli, R., Cinel, C., Sepulveda, F., & Stoica, A. (2013) · IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support · doi:10.1109/cogsima.2013.6523816 · Cited by 20
When Three Heads Are Better Than Two
Jensen, M. S., & Wiley, J. (2006) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 20
La théorie argumentative du raisonnement
Mercier, H. (2009) · HAL · Cited by 20
The Impact of Teaming and Cognitive Style on Student Perceptions of Design Ideation Outcomes
Jablokow, K., Teerlink, W., Yılmaz, S., Daly, S. R., & Silk, E. (2015) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/p.24885 · Cited by 19
A collaborative Brain-Computer Interface for improving group detection of visual targets in complex natural environments
Valeriani, D., Poli, R., & Cinel, C. (2015) · International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering · doi:10.1109/ner.2015.7146551 · Cited by 19

Authors: Laughlin, P. R., Bonner, B. L., & Miner, A. G.
Affiliations: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author: Laughlin, Patrick R.
ORCID: Bonner, Bryan L.
Venue: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2002-07
Volume: 88
Issue: 2
Pages: 605-620
ISSN: 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00003-1
OpenAlex: W2053408677
Cited by: 218
References: 39
Citations by year: 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 19
FWCI: 6.73
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords: group decision making, group versus individual performance, cooperative groups, random coding, insight, collective intelligence, problem solving, information processing strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Groups perform better than the best individuals on Letters-to-Numbers problems

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks