Cited by 134Schizophrenia research and treatmentMind wandering and attentionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Comparison of the continuous performance test with and without working memory demands in healthy controls and patients with schizophrenia

Kurtz, Matthew M, Ragland, J.Daniel, Bilker, Warren, Gur, Ruben C, Gur, Raquel E·2001·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

The Penn Continuous Performance Test (PCPT), a measure of sustained visual attention developed for use in functional neuroimaging studies, was compared with a standard CPT developed by Gordon Diagnostic Systems (GDS; Vigilance subtest). The PCPT and the GDS CPT were administered with a standard neuropsychological battery to 68 healthy adults to assess reliability and construct validity. The test had adequate internal consistency, and convergent validity was established through significant correlations between measures of efficiency on the PCPT and the GDS CPT. With the exception of a significant correlation between efficiency measures on the GDS CPT and a measure of auditory sustained attention, neither version of the CPT correlated significantly with other measures in the battery. Factor analysis showed that the PCPT loaded with the GDS CPT. In 39 patients with schizophrenia and 39 matched, healthy controls, equivalent impairment was evident on the two CPT tasks. Neither version correlated significantly with symptom measurements. These results support previous conclusions that sustained visual attention in schizophrenia is a core information processing deficit, not directly related to symptomatology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0920-9964(00)00060-8

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive performance was assessed using the CPT, LNB, and NYU Paragraph Recall Task.

    “Cognitive performance on the CPT [22] (sustained attention), LNB [23] (attention and working memory), and NYU Paragraph Recall Task [24] (verbal learning and verbal memory) were used to examine LDX’s impact on specific executive function domains.”
  • The neurocognitive tasks were validated computerized measures of working memory, sustained attention, and executive function.

    “using validated computerized tasks: the Letter-N-back task of working memory (28), the Penn Continuous Performance Task (P-CPT) of sustained attention (29), and the Conditional Exclusion Test (CET) of abstraction in executive function (30, 31).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurtz, M. M., Ragland, J. D., Bilker, W., Gur, R. C., & Gur, R. E.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Kurtz, Matthew M
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-03
Volume
48
Issue
2-3
Pages
307-316
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069616794
Cited by
134
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • National Institutes of Health (1k05mh001336-01)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH19112, MH 43880, MH01336, T32MH019112)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
continuous performance test
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Neuropsychological Tests, Schizophrenia, Severity of Illness Index, Visual Perception, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review