CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 100Schizophrenia research and treatmentHallucinations in medical conditionsMental Health and Psychiatry

Confusion between silent and overt reading in schizophrenia

Franck, Nicolas, Rouby, Philippe, Daprati, Elena, Daléry, Jean, Marie-Cardine, Michel, Georgieff, Nicolas·2000·Schizophrenia Research
DOI 10.1016/s0920-9964(99)00067-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The present study was aimed at investigating whether schizophrenic patients are impaired in monitoring their own speech. In particular, we attempted to assess their ability to discriminate between overt and covert speech in a reading task, in order to verify whether they can correctly recollect the modality in which an internally generated action is produced. Subjects were asked to read either silently or aloud, items from a list of words. After a delay of 5 min, they were required to indicate in a new list which words had been read previously (either silently or overtly), or had never been presented during the reading task. With respect to normal controls, schizophrenic patients showed a significant bias to report that they had read aloud words which they had actually read silently, or which were absent during the reading task. The results are discussed in relation to recent neuroimaging studies on inner and overt speech in hallucinating schizophrenic patients. Our data favour the hypothesis that the inability to correctly discriminate between inner and overt speech may play a role in the onset of schizophrenic hallucinations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0920-9964(99)00067-5

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who experience AVHs are more likely to recall an imagined word as spoken or an imagined action as performed, compared to other patients and healthy controls.

    “It has also been shown that patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who experience AVHs are more likely to recall an imagined word as spoken (Franck et al., 2000) or an imagined action as performed (Gawęda et al., 2013), compared to other patients and healthy controls.”

    From Auditory verbal hallucinations as atypical inner speech monitoring, and the potential of neurostimulation as a treatment option (2013) · cites this paper as Franck et al., 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Franck, N., Rouby, P., Daprati, E., Daléry, J., Marie-Cardine, M., & Georgieff, N.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier (FR)
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
ORCID
Daprati, Elena
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-01
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
357-364
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0920-9964(99)00067-5
OpenAlex
W2090359336
Cited by
100
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Johnson and Johnson
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
schizophrenia, silent reading
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Awareness, Confusion, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Male, Reading, Mental Recall, Schizophrenic Language, Schizophrenic Psychology, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review