Cited by 61Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Histologic Appearance of Endometriosis Infiltrating Uterosacral Ligaments in Women with Painful Symptoms

Bonte, Hélène, Chapron, Charles, Vieira, Marco, Fauconnier, Arnaud, Barakat, Habib, Fritel, Xavier, Vacher-Lavenu, Marie-Cécile, Dubuisson, Jean-Bernard·2002·The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists

Abstract

Study objective To describe the histologic appearance of deep endometriosis infiltrating the uterosacral ligaments (USL).Design Retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).Setting University-affiliated hospital.Patients One hundred forty-nine women with pain due to endometriosis.Intervention Resection of one or both USL.Measurements and main results One hundred seventy-two USL were examined by histology after unilateral resection in 126 patients (84.6%) and bilateral resection in 23 (15.4%). Two-thirds of women (122, 70.9%) had a classic appearance of endometriosis. Lesions of myoproliferative endometriosis with a histologic appearance of so-called adenomyotic nodules were observed in 25 (14.5%). Associated fibrosis was most frequent in patients with positive compared with negative histology (85, 69.7% vs 18, 36.0%).Conclusion Anatomicopathologic lesions of deep endometriosis infiltrating the USL are heterogeneous. Adenomyotic nodules are not frequently observed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60530-0

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonte, H., Chapron, C., Vieira, M., Fauconnier, A., Barakat, H., Fritel, X., Vacher-Lavenu, M.-C., & Dubuisson, J.-B.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Cochin (FR)
  • Hôpital Rothschild (FR)
Corresponding author
Chapron, Charles
Venue
The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-11
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
519-524
ISSN
1074-3804 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089234296
Cited by
61
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
deep infiltrating endometriosis, uterosacral ligament, fibrosis, pelvic pain, histological heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Biopsy, Needle, Broad Ligament, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Laparoscopy, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Pelvic Pain, Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review