Cited by 1,034SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Waning Immunity after the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Israel

Open access
Goldberg, Yair, Mandel, Micha, Bar-On, Yinon M., Bodenheimer, Omri, Freedman, Laurence, Haas, Eric J., Milo, Ron, Alroy-Preis, Sharon +2 more·2021·New England Journal of Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In December 2020, Israel began a mass vaccination campaign against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) by administering the BNT162b2 vaccine, which led to a sharp curtailing of the outbreak. After a period with almost no cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, a resurgent Covid-19 outbreak began in mid-June 2021. Possible reasons for the resurgence were reduced vaccine effectiveness against the delta (B.1.617.2) variant and waning immunity. The extent of waning immunity of the vaccine against the delta variant in Israel is unclear. METHODS: We used data on confirmed infection and severe disease collected from an Israeli national database for the period of July 11 to 31, 2021, for all Israeli residents who had been fully vaccinated before June 2021. We used a Poisson regression model to compare rates of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe Covid-19 among persons vaccinated during different time periods, with stratification according to age group and with adjustment for possible confounding factors. RESULTS: Among persons 60 years of age or older, the rate of infection in the July 11-31 period was higher among persons who became fully vaccinated in January 2021 (when they were first eligible) than among those fully vaccinated 2 months later, in March (rate ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 2.0). Among persons 40 to 59 years of age, the rate ratio for infection among those fully vaccinated in February (when they were first eligible), as compared with 2 months later, in April, was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.4 to 2.1). Among persons 16 to 39 years of age, the rate ratio for infection among those fully vaccinated in March (when they were first eligible), as compared with 2 months later, in May, was 1.6 (95% CI, 1.3 to 2.0). The rate ratio for severe disease among persons fully vaccinated in the month when they were first eligible, as compared with those fully vaccinated in March, was 1.8 (95% CI, 1.1 to 2.9) among persons 60 years of age or older and 2.2 (95% CI, 0.6 to 7.7) among those 40 to 59 years of age; owing to small numbers, the rate ratio could not be calculated among persons 16 to 39 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that immunity against the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 waned in all age groups a few months after receipt of the second dose of vaccine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2114228

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Third-dose effectiveness may be declining faster than that of the second dose.

    “However, it seems that effectiveness could be declining faster than that of the second dose6,19.”

    From Waning effectiveness of the third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (2022) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Results (Descriptive Analysis; page unavailable) and Discussion report waning immunity after the second dose. The Discussion mentions a third dose only as a booster approved in response to those findings; it does not assess third-dose effectiveness or compare its rate of decline with that after the second dose. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Additional vaccine effectiveness studies revealed waning of vaccine-induced protection over time.

    “However, as vaccination campaigns progressed, additional vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies revealed waning of the vaccine-induced protection over time [8-13]”
  • Owing to reduced efficacy of LNP-mRNA vaccines over time and the emergence of highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants such as delta and omicron, the effects of booster vaccination are being examined.

    “Owing to the reduced efficacy of LNP-mRNA vaccines over time and the emergence of highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants such as delta (B.1.617.2) and omicron (B.1.1.529),109,110 the effects of booster vaccination are being examined.”

    From COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: Platforms and current developments (2022) · cites this paper as [109]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [2]2. Mor O, Zuckerman NS, Hazan I, et al. BNT162b2 vaccination efficacy is marginally affected by the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.351 variant in fully vaccinated individuals. July 19, 2021. (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3878825). preprint.
  2. [3]3. Abu-Raddad LJ, Chemaitelly H, Butt AA, et al. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants. N Engl J Med 2021;385:187-189.
  3. [5]5. Sheikh A, McMenamin J, Taylor B, Robertson C. SARS-CoV-2 delta VOC in Scotland: demographics, risk of hospital admission, and vaccine effectiveness. Lancet 2021;397:2461-2462.
  4. [7]7. Tang P, Hasan MR, Chemaitelly H, et al. BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant in Qatar. August 11, 2021. (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.11.21261885v1). preprint. · DOI
  5. [8]8. Puranik A, Lenehan PJ, Silvert E, et al. Comparison of two highly-effective mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 during periods of Alpha and Delta variant prevalence. August 21, 2021. (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.06.21261707v3). preprint. · DOI
  6. [9]9. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine through 6 months. N Engl J Med. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2110345. · DOI · Paper page
  7. [11]11. Puranik A, Lenehan PJ, O’Horo JC, et al. Durability analysis of the highly effective BNT162b2 vaccine against COVID-19. September 7, 2021. (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.09.04.21263115v1). preprint. · DOI
  8. [12]12. Khoury DS, Cromer D, Reynaldi A, et al. Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Med 2021;27:1205-1211.
  9. [15]15. Goldberg Y, Mandel M, Woodbridge Y, et al. Protection of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection is similar to that of BNT162b2 vaccine protection: a three-month nationwide experience from Israel. April 24, 2021. (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.20.21255670v1). preprint. · DOI
  10. [18]18. Muhsen K, Na’aminh W, Lapidot Y, et al. A nationwide analysis of population group differences in the COVID-19 epidemic in Israel, February 2020–February 2021. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2021;7:100130-100130.
  11. [20]20. Wall EC, Wu M, Harvey R, et al. Neutralising antibody activity against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs B.1.617.2 and B.1.351 by BNT162b2 vaccination. Lancet 2021;397:2331-2333.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldberg, Y., Mandel, M., Bar-On, Y. M., Bodenheimer, O., Freedman, L., Haas, E. J., Milo, R., Alroy-Preis, S., Ash, N., & Huppert, A.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Goldberg, Yair
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2021-12-09
Volume
385
Issue
24
Pages
e85-e85
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3208466650
Cited by
1,034
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 216 · 2022: 567 · 2021: 88
FWCI
77.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
waning immunity, BNT162b2, COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, Delta variant, breakthrough infection, severe COVID-19, vaccine effectiveness, age differences in vaccine response, Israel, mass vaccination campaigns, COVID-19 resurgence, Omicron variant, mRNA vaccines
MeSH terms
Immunogenicity, Vaccine, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Vaccine Efficacy, BNT162 Vaccine, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Viral, Female, Humans, Immunization, Secondary, Israel, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, Poisson Distribution, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Patient Acuity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review