Cited by 313Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrailty in Older AdultsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Investigation of frailty as a moderator of the relationship between neuropathology and dementia in Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional analysis of data from the Rush Memory and Aging Project

Open access
Wallace, Lindsay M K, Theou, Olga, Godin, Judith, Andrew, Melissa K, Bennett, David A, Rockwood, Kenneth·2019·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Background Some people with substantial Alzheimer's disease pathology at autopsy had shown few characteristic clinical symptoms or signs of the disease, whereas others with little Alzheimer's disease pathology have been diagnosed with Alzheimer's dementia. We aimed to examine whether frailty, which is associated with both age and dementia, moderates the relationship between Alzheimer's disease pathology and Alzheimer's dementia.Methods We did a cross-sectional analysis of data from participants of the Rush Memory and Aging Project, a clinical-pathological cohort study of older adults (older than 59 years) without known dementia at baseline, living in Illinois, USA. Participants in the cohort study underwent annual neuropsychological and clinical evaluations. In the present cross-sectional analysis, we included those participants who did not have any form of dementia or who had Alzheimer's dementia at the time of their last clinical assessment and who had died and for whom complete autopsy data were available. Alzheimer's disease pathology was quantified by a summary measure of neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic and diffuse plaques. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's dementia was based on clinician consensus. Frailty was operationalised retrospectively using health variable information obtained at each clincial evaluation using the deficit accumulation approach (41-item frailty index). Logistic regression and moderation modelling were used to assess relationships between Alzheimer's disease pathology, frailty, and Alzheimer's dementia. All analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and education.Findings Up to data cutoff (Jan 20, 2017), we included 456 participants (mean age at death 89·7 years [SD 6·1]; 316 [69%] women). 242 (53%) had a diagnosis of possible or probable Alzheimer's dementia at their last clinical assessment. Frailty (odds ratio 1·76, 95% CI 1·54-2·02; p<0·0001) and Alzheimer's disease pathology (4·81, 3·31-7·01; p<0·0001) were independently associated with Alzheimer's dementia, after adjusting for age, sex, and education. When frailty was added to the model for the relationship between Alzheimer's disease pathology and Alzheimer's dementia, model fit improved (p<0·0001). There was a significant interaction between frailty and Alzheimer's disease pathology (odds ratio 0·73, 95% CI 0·57-0·94; p interaction=0·015). People with an increased frailty score had a weakened direct link between Alzheimer's disease pathology and Alzheimer's dementia; that is, people with a low amount of frailty were better able to tolerate Alzheimer's disease pathology, whereas those with higher amounts of frailty were more likely both to have more Alzheimer's disease pathology and for it to be expressed as dementia.Interpretation The degree of frailty among people of the same age modifies the association between Alzheimer's disease pathology and Alzheimer's dementia. That frailty is related to both odds of Alzheimer's dementia and disease expression has implications for clinical management, since individuals with even a low level of Alzheimer's disease pathology might be at risk for dementia if they have high amounts of frailty. Further research should assess how frailty and cognition change over time to better elucidate this complex relationship.Funding None.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30371-5

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People in otherwise good physical health can sustain a higher burden of neuropathology without cognitive impairment.

    “People in otherwise good physical health can sustain a higher burden of neuropathology without cognitive impairment.22”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission (2020) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Results report people with a high burden of Alzheimer’s disease pathology who had not been diagnosed with dementia, and the Discussion says people with lower frailty were better able to tolerate that pathology. The claim is broader: the study assessed Alzheimer’s pathology and dementia status, not neuropathology generally or the absence of all cognitive impairment. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The increase might be related to dementia manifesting at later ages, with higher physical frailty leading to a faster decline.

    “The increase might be related to dementia manifesting at later ages, with higher physical frailty22 leading to a faster decline.”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission (2020) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Discussion reports that an earlier analysis found higher baseline physical frailty associated with faster cognitive decline. That supports the frailty–decline link, but not the suggestion that frailty causes faster decline: the paper says its own analysis confirms associations only and calls for further work to establish causation. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • People who are physically more frail are more likely to have dementia, but the relationship between pathology and symptoms in these people is comparatively weak, suggesting that dementia might be from other causes.

    “People who are physically more frail are more likely to have dementia, but the relationship between pathology and symptoms in these people is comparatively weak suggesting that dementia might be from other causes.22”
  • A moderation analysis showed that the relationship between Alzheimer's disease pathology and dementia status differed according to level of frailty (adjusted for age, sex, and education), with increasing frailty weakening the relationship between Alzheimer's disease pathology and dementia.

    “A moderation analysis showed that the relationship between Alzheimer's disease pathology and dementia status differed according to level of frailty (adjusted for age, sex, and education) with increasing frailty weakening the relationship between Alzheimer's disease pathology and dementia (figure 10 ).22”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Hayes AF Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis, Second Edition: A Regression-Based Approach. (Guilford Publications, 2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wallace, L. M. K., Theou, O., Godin, J., Andrew, M. K., Bennett, D. A., & Rockwood, K.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rockwood, Kenneth
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
177-184
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2909144970
Cited by
310
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 34
FWCI
33.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2019-03-01)
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CNA-137794)
  • NIH (R01AG17917)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, frailty, Alzheimer's dementia, neuropathology, neurofibrillary tangles, neuritic plaques, diffuse plaques, older adults, autopsy, Rush Memory and Aging Project, moderating effect, cognitive impairment without dementia, Alzheimer's disease biomarkers
MeSH terms
Frailty, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Frail Elderly

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review