CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 283Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionWorkplace Violence and BullyingChild Abuse and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bullying by peers in childhood and effects on psychopathology, suicidality, and criminality in adulthood

Klomek, Anat Brunstein, Sourander, Andre, Elonheimo, Henrik·2015·The Lancet Psychiatry
DOI 10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00223-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Bullying is shown to be associated with adverse outcomes in cross-sectional studies, but only a few studies have prospectively examined the effects of childhood bullying on adult outcomes. Our Series paper focuses on prospective longitudinal studies that used large, population-based, community samples analysed through quantitative methods and published between 1960 and 2015. We describe the results of childhood bullying in adulthood in three of the most burdensome areas: psychopathology, suicidality, and criminality. We note that the different groups involved (ie, victims, bullies, and bully-victims) are at risk of difficulties later in life, but their risk profiles differ and the contributions are probably not independent. Controlling for confounders reduces the risk and sometimes eliminates it. Victims are at a high risk of internalising disorders. Bullies seem to be at risk of later externalising disorders and criminality, mainly violent crime and illicit drug misuse. Bully-victims seem to be at risk of internalising disorders, externalising disorders, and criminality, but not all studies examined bully-victims as a separate group. Boys and girls differ in their long-term outcomes. A dose effect exists in which frequent bullying involvement in childhood is most strongly associated with adult adversities. Future studies need to control for additional factors (including genetic, psychosocial, and environmental) to account for the mechanisms behind the reported longitudinal associations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00223-0

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 283

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Klomek, A. B., Sourander, A., & Elonheimo, H.
Affiliations
  • Reichman University (IL)
  • University of Turku (FI)
Corresponding author
Klomek, Anat Brunstein
ORCID
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
2
Issue
10
Pages
930-941
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00223-0
OpenAlex
W2148740948
Cited by
283
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
childhood bullying, peer victimization, bullying perpetration, bully-victims, adult psychopathology, internalizing disorders, externalizing disorders, suicidality, criminality, violent crime, sex differences, dosage effect, long-term outcomes
MeSH terms
Criminal Behavior, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Suicide, Crime Victims, Bullying, Patient Outcome Assessment, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review