Cited by 130Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Effectiveness of preventive cognitive therapy while tapering antidepressants versus maintenance antidepressant treatment versus their combination in prevention of depressive relapse or recurrence (DRD study): a three-group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Open access
Bockting, Claudi L H, Klein, Nicola S, Elgersma, Hermien J, van Rijsbergen, Gerard D, Slofstra, Christien, Ormel, Johan, Buskens, Erik, Dekker, Jack +5 more·2018·The Lancet Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Keeping individuals on antidepressants after remission or recovery of major depressive disorder is a common strategy to prevent relapse or recurrence. Preventive cognitive therapy (PCT) has been proposed as an alternative to maintenance antidepressant treatment, but whether its addition would allow tapering of antidepressants or enhance the efficacy of maintenance antidepressant treatment is unclear. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of antidepressants alone, with PCT while tapering off antidepressants, or PCT added to antidepressants in the prevention of relapse and recurrence.Methods In this single-blind, multicentre, parallel, three-group, randomised controlled trial, individuals recruited by general practitioners, pharmacists, secondary mental health care, or media were randomly assigned (10:10:8) to PCT and antidepressants, antidepressants alone, or PCT with tapering of antidepressants, using computer-generated randomised allocation stratified for number of previous depressive episodes and type of care. Eligible participants had previously experienced at least two depressive episodes and were in remission or recovery on antidepressants, which they had been receiving for at least the past 6 months. Exclusion criteria were current mania or hypomania, a history of bipolar disorder, any history of psychosis, current alcohol or drug abuse, an anxiety disorder that requires treatment, psychological treatment more than twice a month, and a diagnosis of organic brain damage. The primary outcome was time-related proportion of individuals with depressive relapse or recurrence in the intention-to-treat population, assessed four times in 24 months. Assessors were masked to treatment allocation, whereas physicians and participants could not be masked. This trial is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, number NTR1907.Findings Between July 14, 2009, and April 30, 2015, 2486 participants were assessed for eligibility and 289 were randomly assigned to PCT and antidepressant (n=104), antidepressant alone (n=100), or PCT with tapering of antidepressant (n=85). The overall log-rank test was significant (p=0·014). Antidepressants alone were not superior to PCT while tapering off antidepressants in terms of the risk of relapse or recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 0·86, 95% CI 0·56-1·32; p=0·502). Adding PCT to antidepressant treatment resulted in a 41% relative risk reduction compared with antidepressants alone (0·59, 0·38-0·94; p=0·026). There were two suicide attempts (one in the antidepressants alone group and one in the PCT with tapering of antidepressants group) and one death (in the PCT and antidepressants group) not related to the interventions during the 24 months' follow-up.Interpretation Maintenance antidepressant treatment is not superior to PCT after recovery, whereas adding PCT to antidepressant treatment after recovery is superior to antidepressants alone. PCT should be offered to recurrently depressed individuals on antidepressants and to individuals who wish to stop antidepressants after recovery.Funding The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30100-7

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Bockting 2018, 19% (8/43) of participants in the discontinuation group reduced their dose by at least 50%.

    “16 of 85 (split 8/43) (19%) were able to reduce the dose by a minimum of 50%.”

    From Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults (2021) · cites this paper as Bockting 2018

    In the Results baseline table (page unavailable), 16/85 (19%) refers to participants receiving current psychological or psychotherapeutic treatment, not to antidepressant dose reduction. The Statistical analysis section defines a 50% dose reduction for a per-protocol analysis, but does not report 8/43 or 16/85 as achieving it. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Bockting 2018, 40% (17/43) of participants in the discontinuation with PCT group discontinued their antidepressant after six months.

    “Bockting 2018 reported that 34 of 85 (split to allow multiple-arm comparisons: 17/43) (40%) participants in the discontinuation with PCT group followed the discontinuation advice and discontinued their antidepressant a er six months”

    From Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults (2021) · cites this paper as Bockting 2018

    The Results (page unavailable) identify 85 participants assigned to PCT while tapering antidepressants, supporting the group size. They report that 30 of 50 participants still in the study after six months adhered to the antidepressant protocol, but do not report that 34 of 85 discontinued antidepressants or establish the citing paper’s split figure of 17/43. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Bockting 2018, 38 of 100 participants in the control group adhered to antidepressant treatment (maintaining at least 20 mg) after six months.

    “In all, 38 of 100 participants in the control group adhered to antidepressant treatment (maintaining ≥ 20 mg antidepressant) a er six months.”

    From Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults (2021) · cites this paper as Bockting 2018

    The Results report that 38 of 66 participants still in the antidepressants-alone group after six months adhered to the antidepressant protocol; 100 were originally assigned to that group. The Procedures specify a maintenance dose of at least 20 mg fluoxetine equivalent, but the claim uses the original group size as the adherence denominator rather than the 66 assessed at six months. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There was no difference in risk of relapse between participants discontinuing antidepressants with support from MBCT or PCT compared to those continuing antidepressants (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.19; 690 participants, 3 studies).

    “There was no difference in risk of relapse (as defined by study authors) between participants discontinuing antidepressants with support from MBCT or PCT compared to those continuing antidepressants (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.19; 690 participants, 3 studies).”

    From Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults (2021) · cites this paper as Bockting 2018

    The Results report no significant difference in recurrence between PCT with antidepressant tapering and continued antidepressants (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.56–1.32). The Discussion also describes three earlier MBCT trials as finding no clinically meaningful difference from maintenance medication. The paper does not report the claimed pooled HR of 0.89 (95% CI 0.66–1.19) for 690 participants across three MBCT-or-PCT studies. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Bockting 2018 (n = 185; split 143) reported two suicide attempts (one in the PCT with tapering group and one in the antidepressants only group) and no deaths in both groups.

    “They reported two suicide attempts (one in the PCT with tapering of antidepressants group, and one in the antidepressants only group).Study authors reported no indication that these were Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews related to the interventions.They reported no deaths in both groups.”

    From Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults (2021) · cites this paper as Bockting 2018

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]27. Beck A, Rush A, Shaw B, Emery G. Cognitive therapy of depression. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 1979.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bockting, C. L. H., Klein, N. S., Elgersma, H. J., van Rijsbergen, G. D., Slofstra, C., Ormel, J., Buskens, E., Dekker, J., de Jong, P. J., Nolen, W. A., Schene, A. H., Hollon, S. D., & Burger, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Lentis (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Arkin (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Bockting, Claudi L H
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
401-410
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2795882974
Cited by
130
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 1
FWCI
9.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
ZonMw (171002401)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
antidepressant tapering, major depressive disorder, depression relapse, depression recurrence, relapse prevention, remission, combination therapy, antidepressant side effects, health care utilization, general practitioners, primary care, secondary mental health care
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Combined Modality Therapy, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Psychotherapy, Recurrence, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review