Cited by 300Data-Driven Disease SurveillanceInfluenza Virus Research StudiesHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis

Harnessing wearable device data to improve state-level real-time surveillance of influenza-like illness in the USA: a population-based study

Open access
Radin, Jennifer M, Wineinger, Nathan E, Topol, Eric J, Steinhubl, Steven R·2020·The Lancet Digital Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute infections can cause an individual to have an elevated resting heart rate (RHR) and change their routine daily activities due to the physiological response to the inflammatory insult. Consequently, we aimed to evaluate if population trends of seasonal respiratory infections, such as influenza, could be identified through wearable sensors that collect RHR and sleep data. METHODS: We obtained de-identified sensor data from 200 000 individuals who used a Fitbit wearable device from March 1, 2016, to March 1, 2018, in the USA. We included users who wore a Fitbit for at least 60 days and used the same wearable throughout the entire period, and focused on the top five states with the most Fitbit users in the dataset: California, Texas, New York, Illinois, and Pennsylvania. Inclusion criteria included having a self-reported birth year between 1930 and 2004, height greater than 1 m, and weight greater than 20 kg. We excluded daily measurements with missing RHR, missing wear time, and wear time less than 1000 min per day. We compared sensor data with weekly estimates of influenza-like illness (ILI) rates at the state level, as reported by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), by identifying weeks in which Fitbit users displayed elevated RHRs and increased sleep levels. For each state, we modelled ILI case counts with a negative binomial model that included 3-week lagged CDC ILI rate data (null model) and the proportion of weekly Fitbit users with elevated RHR and increased sleep duration above a specified threshold (full model). We also evaluated weekly change in ILI rate by linear regression using change in proportion of elevated Fitbit data. Pearson correlation was used to compare predicted versus CDC reported ILI rates. FINDINGS: We identified 47 249 users in the top five states who wore a Fitbit consistently during the study period, including more than 13·3 million total RHR and sleep measures. We found the Fitbit data significantly improved ILI predictions in all five states, with an average increase in Pearson correlation of 0·12 (SD 0·07) over baseline models, corresponding to an improvement of 6·3-32·9%. Correlations of the final models with the CDC ILI rates ranged from 0·84 to 0·97. Week-to-week changes in the proportion of Fitbit users with abnormal data were associated with week-to-week changes in ILI rates in most cases. INTERPRETATION: Activity and physiological trackers are increasingly used in the USA and globally to monitor individual health. By accessing these data, it could be possible to improve real-time and geographically refined influenza surveillance. This information could be vital to enact timely outbreak response measures to prevent further transmission of influenza cases during outbreaks. FUNDING: Partly supported by the US National Institutes of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2589-7500(19)30222-5

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study demonstrated the utilization of resting heart rate and sleep minutes tracked using wearable devices to improve surveillance of influenza-like illness in the USA.

    “One study has also demonstrated the utilization of resting heart rate and sleep minutes tracked using wearable devices to improve surveillance of influenza-like illness in the USA 60 .”

    From Multimodal biomedical AI (2022) · cites this paper as [60]

  • Recent large-scale longitudinal studies have shown promise in leveraging wearable sensor data for health monitoring and prediction.

    “While recent large-scale longitudinal studies have shown promise in leveraging wearable sensor data for health monitoring and prediction, they also introduce new challenges for data modelling.”
  • A recent study demonstrated that influenza surveillance can be improved by incorporating resting HR and sleep durations measured by wearable PPG-based devices into prediction models.

    “A recent study demonstrated that influenza surveillance can be improved by incorporating resting HR and sleep durations measured by wearable PPG-based devices into prediction models”

    From Wearable Photoplethysmography for Cardiovascular Monitoring (2022) · cites this paper as [31]

  • The authors reported that the wearable device is sufficiently accurate even with existing inaccuracies.

    “Nevertheless, the authors reported that the wearable device is sufficiently accurate even with existing inaccuracies [14,143,197].”
  • Most studies using wearable sensors have been conducted in high-income settings like the US and Europe.

    “However, most studies were conducted in high-income settings, like the US and Europe [19, 25, 35].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Radin, J. M., Wineinger, N. E., Topol, E. J., & Steinhubl, S. R.
Affiliations
Scripps Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Radin, Jennifer M
Venue
The Lancet Digital Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
e85-e93
ISSN
2589-7500 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2999317412
Cited by
300
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 1
FWCI
40.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR001114, UL1TR002550)
  • Scoliosis Research Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Keywords
influenza-like illness, wearable sensors, resting heart rate, Fitbit, sleep duration, real-time surveillance, influenza surveillance, respiratory infections, negative binomial regression, influenza B, influenza C, influenza D virus, influenza E, influenza F
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Adult, Female, Humans, Influenza, Human, Male, Population Surveillance, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review