The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Corporate culture and economic theory
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In this chapter, I explore how an economic theorist might explain or model a concept such as corporate culture. While the theoretical construction that is given is far from inclusive (which is to say that many aspects of corporate culture are not covered), I conclude that economic theory is moving in the direction of what seems a reasonable story. But before that story can be considered told, we must employ tools that are currently missing from the economist's tool kit. In particular, we require a framework for dealing with the unforeseen. I can give two explanations for why I present this topic. The first concerns how economists (and those weaned on the economic paradigm) deal with the topic of business strategy. If we take Porter (or Caves or Spence) as the prototype, business strategy could roughly be called applied industrial organization. The firm and its capabilities are more or less taken as givens, and one looks at the tangible characteristics of an industry to explain profitability. It sometimes seems, in this approach, that there are good industries (or segments of industries) and bad: Find yourself in a bad industry (low entry barriers, many substitutes, powerful customers and suppliers, many and surly competitors), and you can do nothing except get out at the first opportunity. Now, this is assuredly a caricature of the Porter approach. The size of entry barriers, relations with suppliers/customers, and, especially, competitive discipline within an industry are all at least partially endogenous.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Survey of Corporate Governance
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x · Cited by 16,243
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081898550789 · Cited by 8,292
Social Theory of International Politics
Wendt, A. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612183 · Cited by 7,664
Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x · Cited by 6,796
Gender Differences in Preferences
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.448 · Cited by 5,694
A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism
Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.5.477 · Cited by 3,146
What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.5.502 · Cited by 3,078
Parkhe, A. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256759 · Cited by 2,698
Jarillo, J. C. (1988) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250090104 · Cited by 2,555
Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions
DENZAU, A. T., & NORTH, D. C. (1994) · Kyklos · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.1994.tb02246.x · Cited by 2,194
Unraveling the resource-based tangle
Peteraf, M. A., & Barney, J. B. (2003) · Managerial and Decision Economics · doi:10.1002/mde.1126 · Cited by 1,661
Crawford, S. E. S., & Ostrom, E. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082975 · Cited by 1,362
Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility
Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.50.1.51 · Cited by 1,116
Fading Memories: A Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments
Burgelman, R. A. (1994) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393493 · Cited by 1,018
The Strength of Corporate Culture and the Reliability of Firm Performance
Sørensen, J. B. (2002) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094891 · Cited by 1,004
Reputation and Feedback Systems in Online Platform Markets
Tadelis, S. (2016) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015325 · Cited by 524
Betrayal Aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States
Bohnet, I., Greig, F., Herrmann, B., & Zeckhauser, R. (2008) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.98.1.294 · Cited by 481
(2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511491207 · Cited by 461
Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances
Sampson, R. C. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.483 · Cited by 443
Organizing Insurgency: Networks, Resources, and Rebellion in South Asia
Staniland, P. (2012) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec_a_00091 · Cited by 238
Multiple gossip statements and their effect on reputation and trustworthiness
Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H.-J., & Milinski, M. (2008) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0762 · Cited by 158
Why we need a new theory of government
Levi, M. (2006) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592706060038 · Cited by 149
Successful organizational change through win-win: How change managers can create mutual benefits
Will, M. G. (2015) · Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change · doi:10.1108/jaoc-06-2013-0056 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Kreps, D. M.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Positive Political Economy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1990-09-28
- Pages
- 90-143
- OpenAlex
- W1495882109
- Cited by
- 2,117
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 125.33
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.