Cited by 186Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Memory, Development, and Rationality: An Integrative Theory of Judgment and Decision Making

Reyna, Valerie F., Lloyd, Farrell J., Brainerd, Charles J.·2003·Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511609978.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rational-thinking tendencies measured by the heuristics-and-biases tasks are probably multifarious.

    “The rational-thinking tendencies measured by these heuristics-and-biases tasks are probably multifarious (Reyna, Lloyd, & Brainerd, 2003;Stanovich, 2009bStanovich, , 2011;;Stanovich, West, & Toplak, 2011).”

    From The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (2011) · cites this paper as Reyna, Lloyd, & Brainerd, 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reyna, V. F., Lloyd, F. J., & Brainerd, C. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research
Published
2003-06-16
Pages
201-245
OpenAlex
W1719870044
Cited by
186
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.48
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
judgment and decision making, memory, cognitive development, rationality, integrative theory, cognitive psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review