Cited by 3Cognitive Abilities and TestingDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Society and Intelligence

Barnett, Susan M., Rindermann, Heiner, Williams, Wendy M., Ceci, Stephen J.·2011·The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence

Abstract

This chapter presents evidence that mechanisms relating to the cognitive unconscious: mental structures, processes, and states that can influence experience, thought, and actions outside phenomenal awareness and voluntary control make an important contribution to intelligent behavior. There have been some recent studies that look at individual differences in the cognitive unconscious. The chapter focuses on individual differences and reviews recent empirical work on relations among the cognitive processes underlying psychometric intelligence and the cognitive processes underlying the cognitive unconscious, attempting to bridge two major research programs that, until recently, have traveled on separate but parallel paths. The dual-process theory of human intelligence aims to integrate modern dual-process theories of cognition with research on intelligence. By fostering collaborations across the various areas of psychology and related disciplines, and incorporating dual-process theory into thinking, one should be able to come to a fuller, more complete understanding of human intelligence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511977244.034

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human abilities are directly shaped by the material and symbolic tools available within a given context and the social institutions supporting their use.

    “They are directly shaped by the material and symbolic tools available within a given context and the social institutions supporting their use (Barnett et al., 2011;Cole, 2005).”
  • Human abilities are modifiable.

    “As they are context-dependent and dynamic, human abilities are modifiable.”
  • The dynamic development of human abilities results from their context-dependent and distributed nature, particularly from the interaction between the individual and symbolic tools and social institutions.

    “The dynamic development of human abilities results from their context-dependent and distributed nature, particularly from the interaction between the individual and the symbolic tools and social institutions, such as schools, which amplify or weaken these capacities (Barnett et al., 2011;Cole, 2005;Flynn, 2011;Nickerson, 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 95 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnett, S. M., Rindermann, H., Williams, W. M., & Ceci, S. J.
Venue
The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence
Published
2011-05-30
Pages
666-682
OpenAlex
W1906495424
Cited by
3
References
95
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.69
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
cognitive unconscious, psychometric intelligence, individual differences, dual-process theory, implicit cognition, intelligent behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review