Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China
Abstract
In most liberal democracies commercialized media is taken for granted, but in many authoritarian regimes the introduction of market forces in the media represents a radical break from the past with uncertain political and social implications. In Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China, Daniela Stockmann argues that the consequences of media marketization depend on the institutional design of the state. In one-party regimes such as China, market-based media promote regime stability rather than destabilizing authoritarianism or bringing about democracy. By analyzing the Chinese media, Stockmann ties trends of market liberalism in China to other authoritarian regimes in the Middle East, North Africa, sub-Saharan Africa and the post-Soviet region. Drawing on in-depth interviews with Chinese journalists and propaganda officials as well as more than 2000 newspaper articles, experiments and public opinion data sets, this book links censorship among journalists with patterns of media consumption and the media's effects on public opinion.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
KING, G., PAN, J., & ROBERTS, M. E. (2017) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055417000144 · Cited by 1,028 · see citing works
Sources of Authoritarian Responsiveness: A Field Experiment in China
Chen, J., Pan, J., & Xu, Y. (2016) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12207 · Cited by 636 · see citing works
Lorentzen, P. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12065 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Remote Control: How the Media Sustain Authoritarian Rule in China
Stockmann, D., & Gallagher, M. E. (2011) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414010394773 · Cited by 575 · see citing works
Self-citationHow Sudden Censorship Can Increase Access to Information
HOBBS, W. R., & ROBERTS, M. E. (2018) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055418000084 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Resilience to Online Censorship
Roberts, M. E. (2020) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032837 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Capturing Clicks: How the Chinese Government Uses Clickbait to Compete for Visibility
Lu, Y., & Pan, J. (2021) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2020.1765914 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Hyun, K. D., & Kim, J. (2015) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2014.994543 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Concealing Corruption: How Chinese Officials Distort Upward Reporting of Online Grievances
PAN, J., & CHEN, K. (2018) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055418000205 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Internal Government Assessments of the Quality of Governance in China
Dimitrov, M. K. (2015) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/s12116-014-9170-2 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Pan, J. (2017) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2016.1181525 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Xue, Y., Chinapah, V., & Zhu, C. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15060650 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stockmann, D.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Stockmann, Daniela
- ORCID
- Stockmann, Daniela
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2012-12-17
- OpenAlex
- W1274346902
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 12
- FWCI
- 24.96
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- OPUS 4 (Zuse Institute Berlin) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
- Keywords
- media commercialization, authoritarianism, one-party state, regime stability, Chinese media, censorship, journalists, propaganda, media use, public opinion, market liberalism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review