The DOI matches its Crossref record.
“Attention,”
Abstract
Introduction The essential claim of this chapter is that the concept of attention is necessary in order to understand virtually every aspect of second language acquisition (SLA), including the development of interlanguages (ILs) over time, variation within IL at particular points in time, the development of L2 influency, the role of individual differences such as motivation, aptitude and learning strategies in L2 learning, and the ways in which interaction, negotiation for meaning, and all forms of instruction contribute to language learning. The theoretical issues dealt with in this chapter are organized around the basic assumptions, definitions, and metaphors concerning attention in psychology and include the idea of attention as a limited capacity, the notion of selective attention, and the role of attention in action control, access to awareness, and learning. It turns out that, like most psychological concepts initially based on common experience, attention is not a unitary phenomenon, but refers to a variety of mechanisms. These include alertness, orientation, preconscious registration (detection without awareness), selection (detection with awareness within selective attention), facilitation, and inhibition. This does not diminish the centrality of attention, in its several manifestations, for learning. Although recent evidence, discussed towards the end of this chapter, indicates the possibility of some unattended learning, this appears limited in scope and relevance for SLA. There is no doubt that attended learning is far superior, and for all practical purposes, attention is necessary for all aspects of L2 learning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Theoretical arguments can also be made for implicit and explicit feedback; implicit feedback caters to implicit learning whereas explicit feedback is more likely to result in the conscious attention to form that Schmidt (2001) saw as important for acquisition and explicit learning.”
From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Schmidt (2001)
In the citing paper
“Therefore, in line with Schmidt's (2001) awareness hypothesis, motivation facilitates deeper processing of vocabulary learning at the cognitive level.”
From Incidental vocabulary learning from digital games: the predictive role of game playing time, foreign language motivation, and anxiety (2026) · cites this paper as Schmidt, 2001
In the citing paper
“Indeed, Schmidt's noticing hypothesis (1990,1995,2001) has played an integral role in the interaction approach, with the claim that L2 learning does not occur without awareness.”
From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Schmidt 2001
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,004
The Intersection between SLA and Feedback Research
Bitchener, J. (2019) · Feedback in Second Language Writing · doi:10.1017/9781108635547.007 · Cited by 57
Révész, A., & Michel, M. C. (2019) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263119000329 · Cited by 55
Switching codes in the plurilingual classroom
López, C. C., & González-Davies, M. (2015) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccv056 · Cited by 69
Lomicka, L. L., & Ducate, L. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1640746 · Cited by 55
“Similar to the benefits of noticing linguistic structures (Schmidt, 1990, 1994, 2001), noticing culture can have a significant impact on students ’ cultural awareness (Ducate & Lomicka, 2016).”
BackgroundDirect and indirect data-driven learning: An experimental study of hedging in an EFL writing class
Sun, X., & Hu, G. (2020) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168820954459 · Cited by 54
“…corpus consultation task aimed to raise the direct-approach group’s awareness of the pervasiveness of the target hedges, provide opportunities for them to notice salient features of hedging (Schmidt, 2001), and facilitate their pattern induction in authentic language use (Boulton & Cobb, 2017).”
BackgroundRoothooft, H., Lázaro-Ibarrola, A., & Bulté, B. (2022) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688221082041 · Cited by 40
The importance of focus on form in communicative language teaching
Ellis, R. (2015) · Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.32601/ejal.460611 · Cited by 59
“Schmidt (1994; 2001) argued that acquisition cannot take place unless learners actually ‘notice’ linguistic forms in the input - a process that he suggests is necessarily conscious.”
BackgroundThe effect of rate of speech and distributed practice on the development of listening comprehension
McBride, K. (2011) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.528777 · Cited by 53
“‘‘. . . SLA is largely driven by what learners pay attention to and notice in target language input’’ (Schmidt, 2001, pp. 3–4), and noticing entails not only detection but also rehearsal in short term memory (Robinson, 1995).”
BackgroundInvestigating consciousness‐raising tasks: pedagogically targeted and non‐targeted learning gains
Eckerth, J. (2008) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00188.x · Cited by 53
The effect of study abroad on the pragmatic development of the internal modification of refusals
Ren, W. (2015) · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) · doi:10.1075/prag.23.4.06ren · Cited by 53
“In the noticing hypothesis (Schmidt 1990, 1993, 1995, 2001), attention to the pragmalinguistic or sociopragmatic information to be acquired is the necessary condition for pragmatic learning to occur.”
BackgroundLee, H., Warschauer, M., & Lee, J. H. (2020) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12634 · Cited by 53
Negative Transfer: Arabic Language Interference to Learning EnglishPreprint
Sabbah, S. S. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2844015 · Cited by 53
Simard, D., Guénette, D., & Bergeron, A. (2015) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2015.1076432 · Cited by 52
“It is believed to be an important, if not crucial, condition for second language acquisition (Schmidt 1990, 1993, 1995, 2001; Schmidt & Frota, 1986).”
BackgroundNoticing vocabulary holes aids incidental second language word learning: An experimental study
de Vos, J. F., Schriefers, H. J., & Lemhöfer, K. (2018) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728918000019 · Cited by 54
Instructional Pragmatics: Bridging Teaching, Research, and Teacher Education
Ishihara, N. (2010) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1749-818x.2010.00242.x · Cited by 62
“While learners’ pragmatic learning is often analyzed at a cognitive level (e.g., noticing and understanding, Bialystok 1993; Schmidt 1993, 2001), pragmatic competence has also been conceptualized in a broader social context in relation to learners’ subjectivity.”
BackgroundReinvestigating the Noticing Function of Output
Uggen, M. S. (2012) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00693.x · Cited by 58
Managing written and oral negative feedback in a synchronous online teaching situation
Guichon, N., Bétrancourt, M., & Prié, Y. (2012) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.636054 · Cited by 52
What the Tweets say: A critical analysis of Twitter research in language learning from 2009 to 2016
Hattem, D., & Lomicka, L. L. (2016) · E-Learning and Digital Media · doi:10.1177/2042753016672350 · Cited by 51
Koval, N. G. (2019) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716419000158 · Cited by 52
“Keywords: attention; eye tracking; second language vocabulary acquisition; spacing effect; study-phase retrieval It is widely believed that attention plays an important role in second language (L2) learning (Gass, 1988; Robinson, 2003; Schmidt, 1990, 2001).”
BackgroundZhang, T., Chen, X., Hu, J., & Ketwan, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660564 · Cited by 51
“SLA researchers have been primarily concerned with highly focused WCF in relation to theoretical claims about the importance of, as Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 2 April 2021 | Volume 12 | Article 660564 Schmidt suggests, “attention” and “understanding” (Schmidt, 2001).”
BackgroundWoll, N. (2019) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2019.1567743 · Cited by 57
“However, Schmidt (2001, 2010) further underlines the distinction between ‘noticing’, the conscious detection of a stimulus, and ‘understanding’, the recognition of a general principle, rule or pattern.”
BackgroundParticipation Structure and Incidental Focus on Form in Adult ESL Classrooms
Nassaji, H. (2013) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12020 · Cited by 50
Learners' Beliefs as Mediators of What Is Noticed and Learned in the Language Classroom
Kartchava, E., & Ammar, A. (2013) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.101 · Cited by 58
The effects of textual enhancement type on L2 form recognition and reading comprehension in Spanish
LaBrozzi, R. (2014) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168814561903 · Cited by 62
Verbal Reports, Noticing, and SLA Research
Egi, T. (2004) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658410408668810 · Cited by 49
Re‐engaging the interface debate: strong, weak, none, or all?
Han, Z., & Finneran, R. B. (2013) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12034 · Cited by 57
“An instantiation par excellence of the strong-interface position is the Noticing Hypothesis (Schmidt 1990; 1995; 2001).”
BackgroundDepth of processing in L2 learning: theory, research, and pedagogy
Leow, R. P., & Mercer, J. D. (2015) · Journal of Spanish Language Teaching · doi:10.1080/23247797.2015.1026644 · Cited by 49
de la Fuente, M. J. (2012) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.733710 · Cited by 49
“Any research that attempts to investigate this question needs to be theoretically grounded, and the attentional framework (Robinson, 1995; Schmidt, 1990, 1993, 1995, 2001) offers a solid framework to investigate MALL-enhanced input processing tasks.”
BackgroundTASK-BASED PRONUNCIATION TEACHING AND RESEARCH
Mora, J. C., & Levkina, M. (2017) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263117000183 · Cited by 60
“Instructed SLA research has shown that noticing and attention are essential to learning (Schmidt, 1990, 1995, 2001) and can be enhanced through various instructional techniques, such as processing instruction (VanPatten, 2002), input enhancement (Sharwood Smith, 1993), or FonF (Doughty & Williams,…”
BackgroundTheodórsdóttir, G. (2018) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12457 · Cited by 53
“…better understanding of how they are organized and lead to a rethinking in social terms of correction and explanation practices as well as noticing (Schmidt, 1990, 2001): Corrections and explanations only work when oriented and agreed to as such by the L2 user through her initiations and uptakes,…”
BackgroundThe L2 status factor hypothesis revisited
Bardel, C., & Sánchez, L. (2017) · Bilingual processing and acquisition · doi:10.1075/bpa.5.05bar · Cited by 53
Pragmatic Awareness in Second Language Acquisition
Soler, E. A., P., M., & Jordà, M. P. S. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_149 · Cited by 52
Language Learning Through Writing: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence
Manchón, R. M., & Vasylets, O. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108333603.015 · Cited by 48
The impact of teaching approach on growth in L2 proficiency and self-efficacy
Harris, J., & Leeming, P. (2021) · Journal of Second Language Studies · doi:10.1075/jsls.20014.har · Cited by 51
Puimège, E., Perez, M. M., & Peters, E. (2021) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/02676583211049741 · Cited by 60
Implicit AND explicit language learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity
Ellis, N. C. (2015) · Cited by 51
Archibald, J. (2018) · doi:10.1002/9781119261650.ch13 · Cited by 48
Zalbidea, J. (2020) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263120000261 · Cited by 50
“…with the stability of both productive and receptive gains for the clitic form found also in the Writing condition, as form incorporation has been associated with more elaborate input processing as well as syntacticization and long-term development of L2 forms (e.g., Robinson, 2003; Schmidt, 2001).”
BackgroundAllocation Of Attention To Second Language Form And Meaning
Morgan‐Short, K., Heil, J., Botero-Moriarty, A., & Ebert, S. (2012) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226311200037x · Cited by 46
“In regard to theoretical perspectives, most if not all approaches to second language (L2) acquisition posit some role for attention whether it be attention at the level of noticing (Schmidt, 2001 ) or attention at the level of detection (Tomlin & Villa, 1994 ).”
BackgroundDiary of a Dabbler: Ecological Influences on an EFL Teacher's Efforts to Study Japanese Informally
Casanave, C. P. (2012) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.47 · Cited by 49
Assessing the effectiveness of interactional feedback for L2 acquisition: Issues and challenges
Nassaji, H. (2020) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444819000375 · Cited by 53
“…to be consciously aware of certain linguistic forms in order to learn them is a contentious issue in the field of SLA, many researchers believe that learning cannot occur without some degree of attention to form or noticing (Schmidt, 2001; Doughty, 2003; Robinson, 2003; Leow, 2015; Ellis, 2016b).”
BackgroundMetalinguistic Knowledge in L2 Task Performance: A Verbal Protocol Analysis
Roehr, K. (2006) · Language Awareness · doi:10.2167/la403.0 · Cited by 45
“Levels of learner awareness were defined in consonance with the noticing hypothesis (Schmidt, 1990, 1993, 2001).”
Background‘Co-constructing’ Explicit L2 Knowledge with High School Spanish Learners through Guided Induction
Toth, P. D., Wagner, E., & Moranski, K. (2012) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/ams049 · Cited by 46
Promoting Grammatical Development Through Textually Enhanced Captions: An Eye‐Tracking Study
LEE, M., & Révész, A. (2018) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12503 · Cited by 59
Dictionaries vs concordancers: actual practice of the two different tools in EFL writing
Lai, S.-L., & Chen, H. H.-J. (2013) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2013.839567 · Cited by 44
Gutiérrez, X. (2008) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00785.x · Cited by 47
Promoting Awareness of Englishes and ELF in the English Language Classroom
Lopriore, L., & Vettorel, P. (2015) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137398093_2 · Cited by 48
Migrants and Mobile Technology Use: Gaps in the Support Provided by Current Tools
Epp, C. D. (2017) · Journal of Interactive Media in Education · doi:10.5334/jime.432 · Cited by 44
“All of these activities work together to facilitate learning (Schmidt 2001).”
BackgroundAryadoust, V., Zakaria, A., Lim, M. H., & Chen, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01941 · Cited by 48
“Other publications looked at specific theories like the output hypothesis (Swain, 1995), communicative competence (Swain, 1985) and the cognitive processes in language learning (Schmidt, 1994, 2001; Miyake and Friedman, 1998; Doughty, 2001).”
BackgroundJiang, D., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2018) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9427-1 · Cited by 43
Task difficulty and self‐repair behavior in second language oral production
Ahmadian, M., Abdolrezapour, P., & Ketabi, S. (2012) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2012.00313.x · Cited by 23
L2 proficiency as predictor of aptitude for interpreting: An empirical study
Mayor, M. J. B. (2015) · Translation and Interpreting Studies · doi:10.1075/tis.10.1.06bla · Cited by 31
Authentic L2 interactions as material for a pragmatic awareness-raising activity
Cheng, T. (2016) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2016.1154568 · Cited by 43
T(w)o and fro: using the L1 as a language teaching tool in the CLIL classroom
Gallagher, F., & Colohan, G. (2017) · The Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2014.947382 · Cited by 43
“The importance of consciousness-raising tasks which draw students’ attention to particular linguistic features of the L2 and facilitate a conscious ‘noticing’ of language on the part of the learner has been emphasised in this regard (Swain 1998; Schmidt 2001; Doughty 2003; Robinson 2003).”
BackgroundCintrón-Valentín, M., & Ellis, N. C. (2015) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263115000029 · Cited by 43
“…Schmidt’s ( 1990 , 1993 ) noticing hypothesis, “since many features of L2 input are likely to be infrequent, non-salient, and communicatively redundant, intentionally focused attention may be a practical (though not theoretical) necessity for successful language learning” (Schmidt, 2001 , p. 23).”
BackgroundLanguage Learner Interaction in a Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Game
Peterson, M. (2012) · Palgrave Macmillan eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137005267_5 · Cited by 47
Källkvist, M. (2013) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.01430.x · Cited by 43
Rassaei, E. (2019) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.03.004 · Cited by 43
Fan, N. (2023) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440231181296 · Cited by 44
Teng, M. F. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1532912 · Cited by 40
“Therefore, given that learners are required to attend to L2 forms to facilitate comprehensible input (Schmidt, 2001), the variable of frequency in video viewing requires further research.”
BackgroundSaito, K., & van Poeteren, K. (2012) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2011.643891 · Cited by 42
“…1997; Long, 2007; Pica, 1994) claim that these types of interactional modifications make L2 input more comprehensible and thereafter accessible for L2 learners, which in turn helps them notice and understand linguistic information within the L2 input more effectively (see also Schmidt, 2001).”
BackgroundGilmore, A. (2015) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444815000269 · Cited by 41
“It seems to me, however, unlikely that the benefits of ‘noticing’ on acquisition (Schmidt 1990, 2001) are limited purely to lexicogrammatical features of the language, and a number of recent studies provide support for a CA pedagogical approach in this regard (Huth & Taleghani-Nikazm 2006;…”
Dabaghi, A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Sciences · doi:10.3923/jas.2008.1.13 · Cited by 41
Dissemination Science in School Mental Health: A Framework for Future Research
Baker, E. A., Brewer, S. K., Owens, J. S., Cook, C. R., & Lyon, A. R. (2021) · School Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s12310-021-09446-6 · Cited by 41
The Written Corrective Feedback Debate: Next Steps for Classroom Teachers and Practitioners
Brown, D. (2012) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.63 · Cited by 42
Measuring student attention in the second language classroom
Hlas, A. C., Neyers, K., & Molitor, S. (2017) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168817713766 · Cited by 44
Captioning and grammar learning in the L2 Spanish classroom
Cintrón-Valentín, M., García-Amaya, L., & Ellis, N. (2019) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2019.1615978 · Cited by 39
“This hypothesis is consonant with foundational theories in SLA, which stress that attention is central to successful L2 acquisition (e.g. Gass, Spinner, and Behney 2017; Schmidt 2001; Tomlin and Vila 1994).”
BackgroundResultShould We Listen or Read? Modality Effects in Implicit and Explicit Knowledge
KIM, K. M., & GODFROID, A. (2019) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12583 · Cited by 34
Glossing and vocabulary learning
Boers, F. (2021) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444821000252 · Cited by 56
Metaphonological awareness in multilinguals: a case of L3 Polish
Wrembel, M. (2014) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2014.890209 · Cited by 40
“He emphasises a crucial role of attention in SLA stating that ‘attention appears necessary for understanding nearly every aspect of second language and foreign language learning’ (Schmidt, 2001, p. 6).”
BackgroundInfluentialTian, L., & Li, L. (2018) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2018.1535602 · Cited by 37
“Learners attend to the output of peers and notice gaps between the output and their pre-existing knowledge (Schmidt, 2001) so as to reflect and restructure their knowledge (Tocalli-Beller & Swain, 2005).”
BackgroundZhan, J., Sun, Q., & Zhang, L. J. (2021) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688211024360 · Cited by 40
“With an attempt to explore the effects of task features on language learning and development, Robinson, based on information processing theories (Schmidt, 2001), put forward his Cognition Hypothesis (Robinson, 2001a, 2001b, 2005), which postulates that learners focus on multiple aspects of…”
MethodFocus-on-form through peer feedback in a Spanish–American telecollaborative exchange
Lee, L. (2011) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2011.592589 · Cited by 41
“According to Schmidt (2001), conscious noticing of language forms is necessary for learning to take place.”
BackgroundViewing L2 captioned videos: what's in it for the listener?
Yeldham, M. (2017) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1406956 · Cited by 44
“…formmeaning mapping of new words or structures in the text – either implicitly (Ellis, 2012), or more explicitly through consciously noticing them (Schmidt, 2001).8 The research by Mitterer and McQueen (2009), Charles and Trenkic (2015) and Trenkic (2016) also suggests the value of captioned…”
BackgroundInteraction, Output, and Communicative Language Learning
Swain, M., & Suzuki, W. (2008) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470694138.ch39 · Cited by 38
Teacher‐Based Assessment for Foreign Language Pragmatics
Ishihara, N. (2009) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00244.x · Cited by 40
Textual enhancement, grammar learning, reading comprehension, and tag questions
Meguro, Y. (2017) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168817714277 · Cited by 45
Implicit and Explicit Cognitive Processes in Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition
Ender, A. (2014) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amu051 · Cited by 38
CURRENT APPROACHES TO RESEARCHING SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNER PROCESSES
Wigglesworth, G. (2005) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s026719050500005x · Cited by 40
DO LEARNERS CONNECT SOCIOPHONETIC VARIATION WITH REGIONAL AND SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS?
Chappell, W., & Kanwit, M. (2021) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263121000115 · Cited by 37
“…M atthew K anw it hand, less proficient learners require greater attentional resources in linking form to meaning, which indicates that they are unlikely to capture the meaning of all forms presented in the input and that more nuanced meanings may not be gleaned (Ellis, 2005; Schmidt, 2001).”
BackgroundDickinson, M., Eom, S., Kang, Y., Lee, C., & Sachs, R. (2008) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588220802343702 · Cited by 38
Gauging the Semantic Transparency of Idioms: Do Natives and Learners See Eye to Eye?
Boers, F., & Webb, S. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139342100.018 · Cited by 39
Planning, Recasts, and Learning of L2 Morphology
Романова, Н. В. (2010) · Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes · doi:10.3138/cmlr.66.6.843 · Cited by 36
Leeming, P., Vitta, J. P., Hiver, P. V., Hicks, D., McLean, S., & Nicklin, C. (2024) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12640 · Cited by 74
The Effects of Practice Modality on Pragmatic Development in L2 Chinese
Ли, Ш., & Taguchi, N. (2014) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12123 · Cited by 35
“This kind of processing corresponds to what Schmidt (1993, 2001) termed understanding (i.e., recognizing underlying pragmatic rules), which represents a deeper level of processing than noticing.”
Developing Idiomatic Competence in the ESOL Classroom: A Pragmatic Account
Liontas, J. I. (2015) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.230 · Cited by 42
“Instruction needs to function as a trigger, or a “hook” of sorts, for subsequent noticing of idioms (selective attention) in the language input (Schmidt, 2001; Stickels & Schwartz, 1987).”
BackgroundJacobsen, N. D. (2016) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amw030 · Cited by 41
Willingness to Communicate: A Predictor of Pushing Vocabulary Knowledge from Receptive to Productive
Heidari, K. (2019) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-019-09639-w · Cited by 55
Exploring L2 learners’ request behavior in a multi-turn conversation with a fully automated agent
Timpe‐Laughlin, V., & Dombi, J. (2020) · Intercultural Pragmatics · doi:10.1515/ip-2020-0010 · Cited by 36
Investigating implicit and explicit processing using L2 learners’ eye-movement data
Godfroid, A., & Winke, P. M. (2015) · Studies in bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.48.14god · Cited by 40
IMPLICIT LEARNING IN THE CROWD
Kerz, E., Wiechmann, D., & Riedel, F. B. (2017) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226311700002x · Cited by 40
“Thus, in such studies all that participants who were subsequently classified as unaware were not aware of was the hidden regularity connecting forms to meanings that falls under what Schmidt (2001) termed “awareness at the level of understanding.””
BackgroundThe Role of Tasks as Vehicles for Language Learning in Classroom Interaction
Kim, Y. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118531242.ch10 · Cited by 34
Abdi, M., Eslami, H., & Zahedi, Y. (2012) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.199 · Cited by 36
Bitchener, J. (2016) · ITL Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/itl.167.2.01bit · Cited by 34
Orienting attention during phonetic training facilitates learning
Pederson, E. R. A., & Guion‐Anderson, S. (2010) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3292286 · Cited by 34
Second language vocabulary learning through subtitling
Lertola, J. (2019) · Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/resla.17009.ler · Cited by 38
The relationship between task-induced involvement load and learning new words from context
Nassaji, H., & Hu, H.-C. M. (2012) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2012-0003 · Cited by 34
“In L2, however, many researchers have proposed that learners need to pay attention to an unknown word if they are going to learn it successfully (e.g., Ellis 1994; Paribakht and Wesche 1999; Schmidt 1990, 1995, 2001).”
Effects of glosses on learning of L2 grammar and vocabulary
Jung, J. (2015) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168815571151 · Cited by 44
“…is that it is crucial to assist learners to channel their attention to the target language (TL) form–meaning constructions while reading for meaning comprehension (Godfroid & Uggen, 2013; Robinson, 1995; Robinson, Mackey, Gass, & Schmidt, 2012; Schmidt, 1990, 1995, 2001; Tomlin & Villa, 1994).”
BackgroundInhibitory Control, Working Memory and L2 Interaction
Gass, S. M., Behney, J., & Üzüm, B. (2013) · Second language learning and teaching · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23547-4_6 · Cited by 32
Concordancing in writing pedagogy and CAF measures of writing
Samoudi, N., & Modirkhamene, S. (2020) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2020-2014 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, R.
- Corresponding author
- Schmidt, Richard
- ORCID
- Schmidt, Richard
- Venue
- Cognition and Second Language Instruction
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2001-11-29
- Pages
- 3-32
- OpenAlex
- W1573000476
- Cited by
- 1,322
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 90 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 111 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 59
- FWCI
- 34.14
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- attention, second language acquisition, interlanguage development, selective attention, limited capacity, alertness, orientation, facilitation, inhibition, individual differences in language learning, motivation, aptitude, learning strategies, interaction in language learning, negotiation of meaning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review