Cited by 62Treatment of Major DepressionEpigenetics and DNA MethylationNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Effects of DNA methylation inhibitors and conventional antidepressants on mice behaviour and brain DNA methylation levels

Sales, Amanda Juliana, Joca, Sâmia Regiane Lourenço·2016·Acta Neuropsychiatrica

Abstract

Objective: Stress increases DNA methylation and decreases the expression of genes involved in neural plasticity, while treatment with DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) increases gene expression and induces antidepressant-like effects in preclinical models. Therefore, the aim of the present work was to further investigate the potential antidepressant-like effect induced by DNMTi by evaluating the behavioural effects induced by associating DNMTi treatment with conventional antidepressant drugs in mice submitted to the forced swimming test (FST). In addition, brain levels of DNA methylation were also investigated. Methods: Mice received systemic injections of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-AzaD, 0.1, 0.2 mg/kg), RG108 (0.1, 0.2, 0.4 mg/kg), desipramine (DES, 2.5, 5, 10 mg/kg) or fluoxetine (FLX, 5, 10, 20, 30 mg/kg) and were submitted to the FST or to the open field test (OFT). Additional groups received a combination of subeffective doses of 5-AzaD or RG108 (DNMTi) with subeffective doses of DES or FLX (antidepressants). Results: Subeffective doses of RG108 (0.1 mg/kg) or 5-AzaD (0.1mg/kg) in association with subeffective doses of DES (2.5 mg/kg) or FLX (10 mg/kg) induced significant antidepressant-like effects. Effective doses of RG108 (0.2 mg/kg), 5-AzaD (0.2 mg/kg), DES (10 mg/kg) and FLX (20 mg/kg) atenuated stress-induced changes in DNA methylation levels in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. None of the treatments induced locomotor effects in the OFT. Conclusion: These results suggest that DNMTi potentiate the behavioural effects of antidepressant drugs in the FST and that antidepressants, as well as DNMTi, are able to modulate stress-induced changes in DNA methylation in brain regions closely associated with the neurobiology of depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/neu.2015.40

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sales, A. J., & Joca, S. R. L.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Joca, Sâmia Regiane Lourenço
Venue
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
Published
2015-06-26
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
11-22
ISSN
  • 0924-2708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1601-5215
OpenAlex
W2109258921
Cited by
62
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Neuropsychiatrica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
DNA methylation inhibitors, hypomethylating agents, antidepressants, decitabine, RG108, desipramine, fluoxetine, antidepressant-like effects, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, depression, forced swim test, open field test, locomotor activity
MeSH terms
Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Hippocampus, Male, Motor Activity, Repressor Proteins, Stress, Psychological, Swimming, Prefrontal Cortex, DNA Methylation, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review