The Limits of Delegation: Veto Players, Central Bank Independence, and the Credibility of Monetary Policy
Open accessAbstract
Governments unable to make credible promises hinder economic development and effective policymaking. Scholars have focused considerable attention on checks and balances and the delegation of authority to independent agencies as institutional solutions to this problem. The political conditions under which these institutions enhance credibility, rather than policy stability, are still unclear, however. We show that checks—multiple veto players—enhance credibility, depending on the extent of uncertainty about the location of the status quo, on how agenda control is allocated among the veto players, and on whether veto players have delegated policymaking authority to independent agencies. In the context of monetary policy and independent central banks, we find evidence supporting the following predictions: Delegation is more likely to enhance credibility and political replacements of central bank governors are less likely in the presence of multiple political veto players; this effect increases with the polarization of veto players.We have benefited from the generous advice of many people, including Alberto Alesina, Tim Besley, Georgios Chortareas, Roberta Gatti, Simon Hug, Stephan Haggard, Witold Henisz, Aart Kraay, Francesca Recanatini, and Mary Shirley, and from comments of seminar participants at DELTA (Paris), George Mason, and Oxford. Three anonymous referees and the editor were especially helpful. This paper's findings, interpretations, and conclusions are entirely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of The World Bank, its executive directors, or the countries they represent.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
1 of 15 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Using J-tests, we rejected the GDP specification in favor of the original specifications in Table 1 regressions 2-4.
“Using J-tests first proposed by Davidson and MacKinnon (1981), we rejected the GDP specification in favor of the original specifications in Table 1 regressions 2-4.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Davidson and MacKinnon (1981) source
- Findingown data
Political replacements of central bank governors are less likely in the presence of multiple political veto players.
“we find evidence supporting the following predictions: delegation is more likely to enhance credibility and political replacements of central bank governors are less likely in the presence of multiple political veto players; this effect increases with the polarization of veto players.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Multiple veto players can increase credibility (reduce inflation).
“These tests use new data both on political institutions and on political polarization and show that multiple veto players can increase credibility (reduce inflation)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Legal central bank independence is more likely to reduce inflation in the presence of multiple political veto players.
“that legal central bank independence is more likely to reduce inflation in the presence of multiple political veto players”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Delegation to an independent central bank is more likely to enhance credibility in the presence of multiple political veto players.
“we find evidence supporting the following predictions: delegation is more likely to enhance credibility and political replacements of central bank governors are less likely in the presence of multiple political veto players; this effect increases with the polarization of veto players.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingnone given
All of these effects strengthen when political veto players are more polarized.
“and that all of these effects strengthen when political veto players are more polarized.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The effect of multiple political veto players on delegation's credibility enhancement increases with the polarization of veto players.
“we find evidence supporting the following predictions: delegation is more likely to enhance credibility and political replacements of central bank governors are less likely in the presence of multiple political veto players; this effect increases with the polarization of veto players.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
If the agenda setter is the veto player who has the least incentive to renege on policy commitments (most inflation-averse), the addition of a second veto player has little effect on credibility.
“Third, policy credibility is sensitive to the decision making rules.If the agenda setter is the veto player who has the least incentive to renege on policy commitments (in this case, is most inflation-averse), the addition of a second veto player has little effect on credibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The addition of a second veto player always reduces expected inflation provided interests of the two veto players are divergent.
“The addition of a second veto player always reduces expected inflation provided interests of the two veto players are divergent; as the third result predicts, this effect is much stronger when the non-agenda setter is less inflation tolerant than the agenda setter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Veto players matter less in a more uncertain environment.
“Veto players matter less in a more uncertain environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The difference in inflation outcomes grows as polarization between the two veto players grows.
“the difference in inflation outcomes grows as polarization between the two veto players grows”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The interaction term CBI * log check is negative.
“the interaction term CBI * log check is negative”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
An increase in central bank independence is estimated to have a negative effect on inflation only at high levels of checks and balances.
“an increase in central bank independence is estimated to have a negative effect on inflation only at high levels of checks and balances”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In each case, an independent central bank achieves lower inflation than two veto players alone.
“In each case, an independent central bank achieves lower inflation than two veto players alone”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Delegation of monetary policy to a more conservative central banker always lowers expected inflation when there are multiple veto players.
“First, delegation of monetary policy to a more conservative central banker always lowers expected inflation when there are multiple veto players.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Legal central bank independence has no significant impact on inflation when it enters linearly in a sample including both OECD and developing countries.
“legal central bank independence has no significant impact on inflation when it enters linearly in a sample including both OECD and developing countries”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The threshold political polarization >0.6 corresponds roughly to the mean value of political polarization for the group of countries in which political polarization is not equal to 0.
“This corresponds roughly to the mean value of political polarization for the group of countries in which political polarization is not equal to 0.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The central banker is able to pursue a lower inflation policy as polarization of the political actors increases.
“Second, the central banker is able to pursue a lower inflation policy as polarization of the political actors increases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In each case an independent central bank reduces inflation only where multiple veto players are present.
“The table provides additional evidence that in each case an independent central bank reduces inflation only where multiple veto players are present, as the theory predicts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The larger the variance of the supply shock, and therefore the greater the uncertainty surrounding the default or status quo outcome, the less influential is the non-agenda setter in setting policy.
“First, the larger is the variance of the supply shock, and therefore the greater the uncertainty surrounding the default or status quo outcome, the less influential is the non-agenda setter in setting policy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Openness is significantly and negatively correlated with inflation.
“openness is significantly and negatively correlated with inflation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The variable political constraints is significant, economically and statistically, when substituted for log checks in the Regression 1 specification.
“The variable political constraints is similarly significant, economically and statistically, when substituted for log checks in the Regression 1 specification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The effect of adding a second veto player is much stronger when the non-agenda setter is less inflation tolerant than the agenda setter.
“The addition of a second veto player always reduces expected inflation provided interests of the two veto players are divergent; as the third result predicts, this effect is much stronger when the non-agenda setter is less inflation tolerant than the agenda setter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
If the two veto players have identical preferences, the second veto player has no influence at all on outcomes.
“Of course, if the two veto players have identical preferences (b 1 = b 2 ), the second veto player has no influence at all on outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The effect of central bank independence on inflation is conditional on the presence of checks and balances in government.
“Regression 2 suggests that the effect of central bank independence on inflation is conditional on the presence of checks and balances in government.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The addition of an independent central bank makes the most difference when the agenda setter is more tolerant of inflation.
“Third, just as the addition of a second veto player makes the most difference when the agenda setter is more tolerant of inflation, so too does the addition of an independent central bank.”
- Also stated in: § The introduction of an independent central bank · plain
“the biggest impact of an independent central bank occurs when the agenda setter is more inflation-tolerant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § The introduction of an independent central bank · plain
- Findingreasoning
In the reverse situation, where the non-agenda setter is less inflation tolerant than the agenda setter, multiple veto players have a significant effect on policy credibility.
“In the reverse situation, multiple veto players have a significant effect on policy credibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
An increase in tenure protections CEO reduces governor turnover only in the presence of multiple veto players (or polarized veto players in the case of political polarization).
“An increase in tenure protections CEO reduces governor turnover only for in the presence of multiple veto players (or polarized veto players in the case of political polarization).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The CBI * checks interaction terms generally retain their significance when CBI * openness is added to the Table I specifications.
“the CBI * checks interaction terms generally retain their significance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Political interference with central banks is less frequent in countries with multiple veto players having divergent preferences.
“Political interference with central banks is less frequent in countries with multiple veto players having divergent preferences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the log inflation regression, the interaction between central bank independence and political polarization has a negative coefficient of -1.95 (SE 0.78).
“CBI*political polarization -1.95 (0.78)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The impact of checks and balances on inflation (credibility) is greater in more polarized societies.
“the impact of checks and balances on inflation (credibility) is greater in more polarized societies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the central bank governor turnover regression, the interaction between CEO and political constraints has a negative coefficient of -0.762 (SE 0.323).
“CEO*polcon -.762 (.323)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Political instability does not explain the results linking checks and balances to inflation and central bank governor turnover.
“It might also be argued that political instability explains our results: countries that exhibit checks and balances are less stable, and it is their instability, rather than checks and balances, that generates our results.The evidence suggests that this is not the case, however.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
An interaction term openness*CBI does not affect the results in Table 1.
“We find that an interaction term opennesss*CBI does not affect the results in Table 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the log inflation regression, the interaction between central bank independence and log checks has a negative coefficient of -3.16 (SE 1.48).
“CBI * log check -3.16 (1.48)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Central bank governor turnover is reduced when governors have tenure protections supported by political checks and balances.
“the turnover of central bank governors is reduced when governors have tenure protections supported by political checks and balances.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The CBI * openness interaction term is never significant in the Table I specifications.
“we added the interaction term CBI * openness to the Table I specifications and found that it was never significant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The correlation between three measures of political instability and the checks variable is slightly positive in two cases and negative in a third.
“the correlation between three measures of political instability and the checks variable (all from the Database of Political Indicators) is slightly positive (7 percent) in two cases, and negative (-17 percent) in a third case.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The results in Table 1 are robust to controls for serial correlation (inclusion of log inflation, lagged one period).
“However, the results in Table 1 are robust to controls for serial correlation (that is, the inclusion of log inflation, lagged one period).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the log inflation regression, the interaction between central bank independence and political constraints has a negative coefficient of -5.10 (SE 1.52).
“CBI*polcon -5.10 (1.52)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Central banks are associated with lower inflation (greater credibility of government monetary policy) in the presence of checks and balances.
“Central banks are associated with lower inflation (that is, greater credibility of government monetary policy) in the presence of checks and balances”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Where there is greater uncertainty about which status quo will prevail in the future, additional veto players have less effect on credibility.
“For example, we find that where there is greater uncertainty about which status quo will prevail in the future, additional veto players have less effect on credibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
During the Gürzenich Affair of 1955-56, the German Bundesbank was able to insist on a course of action strongly opposed by Chancellor Konrad Adenauer precisely because members of his cabinet, Ludwig Erhard and Fritz Schäffer, supported the central bank.
“For example, during the Gürzenich Affair of 1955-56, the German Bundesbank was able to insist on a course of action strongly opposed by Chancellor Konrad Adenauer precisely because members of his cabinet, Ludwig Erhard and Fritz Schäffer, supported the central bank.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berger and de Haan (1999)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
The possibility of unpredictable economic shocks can motivate the inflation-averse veto player to delegate authority.
“The possibility of unpredictable economic shocks can, however, motivate the inflationaverse veto player to delegate authority.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Delegation changes policy only in the presence of multiple veto players.
“A brief illustration based on Figure 1 is sufficient to show that delegation changes policy only in the presence of multiple veto players.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The relationship between legal central bank independence and inflation has not been documented in samples that include both developed and developing countries.
“However, this relationship has not been documented in samples that include both developed and developing countries (Cukierman, Webb, and Neyapti, 1992).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cukierman, Webb, and Neyapti, 1992
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Many governments inherit central bank legislation approved by earlier governments, frequently earlier governments controlled by inflation-averse political parties that established a central bank fearing a future in which more inflation-tolerant parties might take office.
“As a factual matter, moreover, many governments inherit central bank legislation approved by earlier governments, frequently earlier governments controlled by inflation-averse political parties that established a central bank fearing a future in which more inflation-tolerant parties might take office.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The presence of a conservative central banker who prefers a lower rate of inflation than either veto player can reduce inflation.
“The presence of a”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The central bank has an effect on policy to the extent that it can change the default or status quo rate of inflation relative to what would prevail in its absence.
“The central bank has an effect on policy, therefore, to the extent that it can change the default or status quo rate of inflation relative to what would prevail in its absence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In the absence of a central bank, policy does not shift from the status quo when there are two veto players and no policy that the agenda setter could propose that both prefer to the status quo.
“In the absence of a central bank, policy does not shift from sq since there is no policy that v 2 could propose that both she and v 1 prefer to sq.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Delegation in the presence of economic shocks yields inflation outcomes closer to the preferred outcome of v1.
“Delegation in the presence of economic shocks therefore yields inflation outcomes closer to the preferred outcome of v 1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The presence of a central bank can only change policy outcomes in the presence of multiple veto players.
“Clearly, then, the presence of a central bank can only change policy outcomes in the presence of multiple veto players.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The model predicts that an increase in central bank independence will have a negative impact on inflation only at relatively high levels of polarization (political polarization >0.6).
“The model predicts that an increase in central bank independence will have a negative impact on inflation only at relatively high levels of polarization (political polarization >0.6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The policy that prevails if the two veto players revoke the central bank's independence is precisely the policy derived earlier when there is no central bank.
“Consequently, the policy that prevails should they revoke the central bank's independence is precisely the policy derived earlier when there is no central bank.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The political polarization measure is a reasonable proxy for the degree to which the preferences of veto players diverge.
“Given the way it is constructed, the political polarization measure is a reasonable proxy for the degree to which the preferences of veto players diverge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Veto players occupying different veto points and from different parties do not have identical preferences with respect to economic policy.
“We do not regard this as likely, however, given that one of the principal reasons for two politicians not belonging to the same party is that they have different preferences over policy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The measures developed by Keefer (2002) and Henisz (1997) capture the number of veto players as well as can be done in a cross-country setting that includes both OECD and developing countries.
“The measures developed by Keefer (2002) and Henisz (1997) capture the number of veto players as well as can be done in a cross-country setting that includes both OECD and developing countries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Keefer (2002)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Henisz (1997)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductcitation
Governor turnover is the best available proxy for the extent of political interference with central bank governors.
“We use this latter measure, which we call governor turnover, in our test of hypothesis 3, because it appears to be the best available proxy for the extent of political interference with central bank governors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Multiple veto players with divergent preferences must be present for central bank independence to have a significant impact.
“This result is consistent with the predictions of our theoretical model, as it suggests that multiple veto players with divergent preferences must be present for central bank independence to have a significant impact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Delegation to an independent agency enhances credible commitment.
“Delegation enhances credible commitment”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The central bank is more inflation-averse than either of the political actors.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The most inflation-averse veto player prefers the outcome under checks and balances to the most preferred outcome of the central banker.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The economic shock ε is distributed uniformly over the range [-c, c].
- Study design and conductnone given
The results are robust to using a version of political constraints that excludes the judiciary as a veto player.
“All of the results we report are robust to using a version of political constraints that excludes the judiciary as a veto player.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The move towards a less inflation-averse agenda setter had little effect on policy because other, more conservative veto players remained the same.
“The analysis here suggests that the move towards a less inflation-averse agenda setter had little effect on policy because other, more conservative veto players remained the same (e.g., the Republican president).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Policy reformers face frustration if, in the absence of appropriate political institutions, they grant policy making authority to formally independent agencies.
“These results suggest that policy reformers face frustration if, in the absence of appropriate political institutions, they grant policy making authority to formally independent agencies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The results are robust to using executive constraints from the Polity IV database.
“Our results are also robust to the use of a executive constraints, a variable from the Polity IV database.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Governor turnover is a better proxy for political influence than measures that focus on the overall rate of turnover for central bank governors.
“As argued above, while even this variable is likely to be an imperfect proxy for political influence, it is a better proxy than measures that focus on the overall rate of turnover for central bank governors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Political institutions are crucial to the sustainability and effectiveness of decision making by independent agencies.
“Political institutions, instead, are crucial to the sustainability and effectiveness of decision making by independent agencies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In 1975, at the trough of a two-year old recession, Federal Reserve policy was markedly more conservative than either the Republican President Ford or the Democratic Congress desired.
“In 1975, at the trough of a two-year old recession, Federal Reserve policy was markedly more conservative than either the Republican President Ford or the Democratic Congress desired.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wooley (1984, 144 -47)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
In countries where decisions over replacing the central bank governor would normally be made by a single veto player, legal guarantees of tenure can increase the number of veto players whose accord is necessary to replace the central bank governor.
“In countries where decisions over replacing the central bank governor would normally be made by a single veto player, then legal guarantees of tenure can have the effect of increasing the number of veto players whose accord is necessary to replace the central bank governor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The Bundesbank was able to get nearly everything it wanted in the conflict with the support of these two ministers.
“Despite this -but as the model predicts -the Bundesbank was able to get nearly everything it wanted in the conflict with the support of these two ministers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The impact of veto players on credible commitment depends on the certainty with which players can anticipate future status quo or default outcomes.
“the analysis shows that the impact of veto players depends on the certainty with which players can anticipate future status quo or default outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The central bank is more inflation-averse than either of the political actors.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The most inflation-averse veto player prefers the outcome under checks and balances to the most preferred outcome of the central banker.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The economic shock ε is distributed uniformly over the range [-c, c].
- Interpretationreasoning
Multiple veto players have more limited effects on credible commitment in more volatile policy environments characterized by exogenous shocks.
“Multiple veto players have more limited effects in more volatile policy environments characterized by exogenous shocks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The central bank is more inflation-averse than either of the political actors.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The most inflation-averse veto player prefers the outcome under checks and balances to the most preferred outcome of the central banker.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The economic shock ε is distributed uniformly over the range [-c, c].
- Study design and conductown data
The results are robust to the inclusion of political instability.
“our regression results are robust to the inclusion of instability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The two cabinet ministers were de facto veto players.
“First, the two cabinet ministers were de facto veto players.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Prestige alone is insufficient to guarantee central bank independence.
“the evidence suggests that prestige alone is insufficient to guarantee independence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
There is strong evidence that the presence of multiple polarized veto players reduces political influence on central banks.
“We therefore find strong evidence to support the conclusion that the presence of multiple polarized veto players reduces political influence on central banks”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 23
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 22
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe interaction term CBI*polcon is negative and statistically significant.
“The interaction term CBI*polcon is negative and statistically significant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe addition of a second, non-agenda setting veto player increases policy credibility, with the effect rising in the magnitude of the preference differences between the two veto players.
“Second, the addition of a second, non-agenda setting veto player increases policy credibility, with the effect rising in the magnitude of the preference differences between the two veto players.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe Regression 4 result is robust to the linear inclusion of log check.
“This result in Regression 4 is also robust to the linear inclusion of log check to the regression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe coefficient on the interaction term CBI*political polarization in Regression 4 is negative and statistically significant.
“The coefficient on the interaction term CBI*political polarization in Regression 4 is negative and statistically significant, supporting Prediction 2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe coefficient on log check is negative and significant.
“the coefficient on log check is negative and significant”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn each of the three regressions the interaction term pol inst.*CEO has the expected negative sign and is statistically significant for log check and political constraints.
“In each of the three regressions the interaction term has the expected negative sign and is statistically significant for log check and political constraints.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn our sample we find little evidence that central bank independence is endogenous to lagged inflation, nor is CBI endogenous to contemporary inflation.
“Empirically, in our sample we find little evidence that central bank independence is endogenous to lagged inflation, nor is CBI endogenous to contemporary inflation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe estimated effect on log inflation of a one-standard-deviation increase in central bank independence is negative for two and three veto players and near zero for one veto player.
“one veto player 0.002 (0.077) 0.238 (0.110) two veto players -0.116 (0.088) -0.094 (0.058) three veto players -0.208 (0.116) -0.182 (0.066)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOur results are robust to two other variables omitted in Table 1, and to the exclusion of influential outliers.
“Our results are also robust to two other variables omitted in Table 1, and to the exclusion of influential outliers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen entered into Table 1 regressions, the log of real GDP per capita is never significant and leaves the estimates of the interaction terms nearly unchanged.
“However, when entered into our Table 1 regressions, the log of real GDP per capita is never significant and leaves the estimates of the interaction terms nearly unchanged.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn regression 5 we rejected the political polarization specification in favor of the GDP specification.
“In regression 5 we rejected the political polarization specification in favor of the GDP specification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataResults of Lagrange multiplier tests suggest serial correlation of the error terms might have led to inconsistent estimates of standard errors in the tests in Table 1.
“Results of Lagrange multiplier tests suggest serial correlation of the error terms might have led to inconsistent estimates of standard errors in the tests in Table 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe coefficients on both proxies for the number of veto players are negative and significant, as is the coefficient on political polarization.
“The coefficients on both proxies for the number of veto players are negative and significant, as is the coefficient on political polarization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe conditional standard error of the CEO effect is quite sizeable in all regressions; even at very high levels of checks and balances, it is impossible to reject the hypothesis that the effect is zero.
“However, the conditional standard error of this effect is quite sizeable in all regressions -even at very high levels of checks and balances, it is impossible to reject the hypothesis that the effect is zero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn the central bank governor turnover regression, the interaction between CEO and log check has a negative coefficient of -0.518 (SE 0.299).
“CEO * log check -.518 (.299)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMultiple veto players (checks and balances) enhance policy credibility, but the effect depends on uncertainty about the location of the status quo, on how agenda control is allocated among the veto players, and on whether veto players have delegated policy making authority to independent agencies.
“We show that checks -multiple veto players -enhance credibility, depending on the extent of uncertainty about the location of the status quo, on how agenda control is allocated among the veto players, and on whether veto players have delegated policy making authority to independent agencies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenPoliticians might delegate to increase policy credibility, but delegation has this effect only in the presence of multiple veto players with polarized preferences.
“Our results suggest that politicians might also delegate to increase policy credibility, but that delegation has this effect only in the presence of multiple veto players with polarized preferences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe effects of additional veto players on policy outcomes depend on whether their preferences diverge from those of existing veto players.
“emphasizing, for example, that the effects of additional veto players on policy outcomes depend on whether their preferences diverge from those of existing veto players.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tsebelis (1995, 2002)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPolicy credibility varies with the number and polarization of preferences of veto players, but the underlying logic differs from policy stability.
“In the analysis that follows, we show that policy credibility varies with the number and polarization of preferences of veto players, but the underlying logic is different.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationDecade dummy variables control for unobserved characteristics specific to each time period.
“We also follow Cukierman, Webb, and Neyapti (1992) and include decade dummy variables to control for unobserved characteristics specific to each time period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cukierman, Webb, and Neyapti (1992)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe checks variable is explicitly incremented when a party in the government has an economic policy orientation closer to that of the main opposition party than to that of the party of the executive.
“In addition, unlike political constraints, the checks variable is explicitly incremented when a party in the government has an economic policy orientation closer to that of the main opposition party than to that of the party of the executive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Keefer (2002)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningQualitative evidence from specific instances of confrontation between central bankers and political decision makers provides further support for the analysis here.
“Qualitative evidence emerging from specific instances of confrontation between central bankers and political decision makers provides further support for the analysis here.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe model underlines the importance of taking political institutions and preferences into account when examining the impact of administrative arrangements such as central bank independence.
“The model underlines the importance of taking political institutions and preferences into account when examining the impact of administrative arrangements such as central bank independence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMultiple veto players can increase policy credibility as well as policy stability.
“Multiple veto players therefore can increase policy credibility as well as policy stability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRomer (1993) argues that as imports increase as a share of total consumption, policy makers have less of an ex post incentive to inflate.
“This follows Romer (1993), who argues that as imports increase as a share of total consumption, policy makers have less of an ex post incentive to inflate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Romer (1993) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningPrediction 3 has not been previously tested and provides supporting evidence for the primary thesis that central bank independence depends on checks and balances.
“This is Prediction 3, which has also not been previously tested and provides supporting evidence for the primary thesis that central bank independence depends on checks and balances.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationTsebelis (2002) argues persuasively that the number of veto players affects policy only insofar as the veto players have divergent policy preferences.
“Tsebelis (2002) argues persuasively that the number of veto players affects policy only insofar as the veto players have divergent policy preferences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tsebelis (2002)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataLegal independence can reduce inflation bias in both developed and developing countries, but this depends on the level of checks and balances in a country's political system.
“Our results suggest that legal independence can reduce inflation bias in both developed and developing countries, but that this depends on the level of checks and balances in a country's political system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationTests of Proposition 1 must treat veto players with the same preferences as only a single veto player.
“To be consistent with this condition, tests of Proposition 1 must therefore treat veto players with the same preferences as only a single veto player.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe political polarization measure is simultaneously a proxy for the number of veto players in a country because it takes a value of zero for systems with only one veto player.
“In addition, however, since it takes a value of zero for systems with only one veto player, it is simultaneously a proxy for the number of veto players in a country.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe two recently developed measures of checks and balances have the advantage of being based on objective criteria and of capturing the existence of coalition governments or divided control of two chambers in a bicameral system.
“They have the advantage of being based on objective criteria and of capturing the existence of coalition governments or divided control of two chambers in a bicameral system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningBoth checks and balances indicators rise with the number of veto points and fall when the veto points are occupied by the same political party.
“Both of these indicators rise with the number of veto points (depending upon the number of legislative chambers) and fall when the veto points are occupied by the same political party (depending on whether majorities are multi-party coalitions).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenPrediction 2, regarding the effect of increasing polarization among veto players, has not been previously tested.
“Prediction 2, regarding the effect of increasing polarization among veto players, has not been previously tested.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningDelegation improves policy credibility because it is more difficult for multiple veto players to agree to overturn an agency's decision than their own.
“Delegation improves policy credibility because it is more difficult for multiple veto players to agree to overturn an agency's decision than their own.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMultiple veto players in government make it more difficult to reverse a decision to delegate, giving independent central banks greater scope to reduce the inflation bias.
“As we do, they argue that multiple veto players in government make it more difficult to reverse a decision to delegate, giving independent central banks greater scope to reduce the inflation bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lohmann (1998)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Moser (1999) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCukierman, Webb, and Neyapti (1992) show that the rate of turnover of central bank governors is positively and significantly correlated with inflation in a sample including both developed and developing countries.
“Cukierman, Webb, and Neyapti (1992) argue that high turnover of central bank governors is indicative of low independence, and they show that the rate of turnover is positively and significantly correlated with inflation in a sample including both developed and developing countries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cukierman, Webb, and Neyapti (1992)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationA number of papers have found a statistically significant relationship between legal measures of central bank independence and inflation in advanced industrialized economies.
“A number of papers have found a statistically significant relationship between legal measures of central bank independence and inflation in advanced industrialized economies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe analysis is consistent with substantial research, beginning with Rogoff (1985), that shows that even an inflation-tolerant political actor might prefer to delegate authority to a conservative central banker in the presence of unpredictable economic shocks.
“However, the analysis above is consistent with substantial research, beginning with Rogoff (1985), that shows that even an inflation-tolerant political actor might prefer to delegate authority to a conservative central banker in the presence of unpredictable economic shocks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rogoff (1985) source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIf there were only one veto player, policy would always be at that player's preferred outcome, with or without the central bank; any attempt by the central bank to propose a different inflation rate would be immediately overridden.
“What if v 1 or v 2 were the only veto player?Then policy would always be at their preferred outcome, with or without the central bank; any attempt by the central bank to propose a different inflation rate would be immediately overridden by the single veto player.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenDelegation enhances credible commitment more when the interests of competing veto players are more divergent and when the interests of the non-agenda setter are closer to those of the agency to which authority has been delegated.
“Delegation enhances credible commitment, and does so the more divergent are the interests of the competing veto players and, especially, the closer are the interests of the non-agenda setter to those of the agency to which authority has been delegated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The central bank is more inflation-averse than either of the political actors.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The most inflation-averse veto player prefers the outcome under checks and balances to the most preferred outcome of the central banker.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The economic shock ε is distributed uniformly over the range [-c, c].
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe Fed was able to pursue a more aggressive policy than the veto players preferred.
“Knowing this, the Fed was able to pursue a more aggressive policy than the veto players preferred.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe evidence presented in the robustness section indicates that serial correlation, endogeneity, omitted variables, and outliers do not provide plausible alternative explanations of the empirical findings.
“The evidence presented in this section indicates that these do not provide plausible alternative explanations of our empirical findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe evidence for the paper's points derives from diverse institutional settings in the developed and developing world.
“The evidence for many of these points is direct and, unlike much of the empirical evidence in this area it derives from diverse institutional settings in the developed and developing world.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Governments unable to make credible commitments cannot stimulate economic growth (and tax collections) by promising a stable tax and regulatory environment.
“When governments are unable to make credible commitments (e.g., to follow a set of rules tomorrow that they announce today), they cannot stimulate economic growth (and tax collections) by, for example, promising a stable tax and regulatory environment for firms.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Private actors form inflation expectations and write contracts before the government sets monetary policy.
“Before the government actually sets monetary policy, however, private actors must form inflation expectations and write contracts governing the future sale of goods and services.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
There is one player with agenda-setting authority—the ability to make a take-it-or-leave-it offer to the other player.
“We assume throughout the paper that there is one player with agenda-setting authority -the ability to make a take-it-or-leave-it offer to the other player.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The default inflation outcome confronting politicians is endogenous: it is the product of private sector decisions made in anticipation of politicians' decisions.
“the default outcome we employ in the models below -the inflation that prevails in the absence of government action in the second period -is the set of price increases programmed by the private sector into its contracts in the first period.”
“the status quo here is endogenous: the default inflation outcome confronting politicians is the product of private sector decisions that are made in anticipation of the decisions of politicians.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The private sector does not observe the random supply shock.
“However, the private sector does not observe the random supply shock, and therefore cannot know for sure what decision the veto players will make upon observing the private sector's contracts.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The central bank has no informational or other advantages over the government.
“Delegation to a central bank is traditionally analyzed within the context of the single veto player model outlined above, where the central bank has no informational or other advantages over the government.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The central bank, rather than the private sector, sets the default rate of inflation that political veto players must accept if they choose not to override it.
“The key attribute of an independent central bank is that it, rather than the private sector, sets the default rate of inflation that political veto players must accept if they choose not to override it.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Central bank independence is treated as exogenous.
“These examples provide a justification for the decision made in this paper to treat central bank independence as exogenous.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The six months following changes in government is a period where any political influence on central bank governors is most likely to be exercised.
“Cukierman and Webb (1995) collect data on the frequency with which central bank governors are replaced in the six months following changes in government, a period where any political influence is most likely to be exercised.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The central bank is more inflation-averse than either of the political actors.
“First, the central bank is assumed to be more inflation-averse than either of the political actors”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The most inflation-averse veto player prefers the outcome under checks and balances to the most preferred outcome of the central banker.
“Third, to avoid trivial cases, the most inflation-averse veto player prefers the outcome under checks and balances to the most preferred outcome of the central banker.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The economic shock ε is distributed uniformly over the range [-c, c].
“assume ε is distributed uniformly over the range[-c, c].”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The probabilities of the four decision making outcomes sum to one.
“where the q i 's are the probabilities of each of the four decision making outcomes and sum to one”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is consensus in theory and practice that monetary policy faces commitment problems and that granting independence to the monetary policy authority can help overcome them with the right institutional design.
“there is consensus in theory and practice that monetary policy faces commitment problems and that granting independence to the monetary policy authority can help overcome them with the right institutional design (see Keefer and Stasavage 2003).”
From Independent Agencies, Distribution, and Legitimacy: The Case of Central Banks (2020) · cites this paper as Keefer and Stasavage 2003
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Governor-turnover measure has two different triggering events
MinorOne description says the measure counts replacements after a change in government; another says it counts replacements after elections. Elections do not necessarily change the government, so these definitions cover different events.
“Cukierman and Webb (1995) collect data on the frequency with which central bank governors are replaced in the six months following changes in government”
“which measures the frequency with which central bank governors are replaced in the six months following elections.”
Governor-turnover regressions are assigned to Table 3
MinorThe cited regressions concern governor turnover, but Table 3 reports estimated effects on inflation. The six governor-turnover regressions appear in Table 4.
“This results in the exclusion of only 4 potential observations from our Table 3 regressions.”
“Table 3 Estimated effect on log inflation of a one-standard deviation increase in central bank independence”
Robustness tests point to the wrong table
MinorThe robustness section describes regressions and their standard errors as being in Table 1, but Table 1 describes monetary-policy decision sequences. The inflation regressions are in Table 2.
“Results of Lagrange multiplier tests suggest serial correlation of the error terms might have led to inconsistent estimates of standard errors in the tests in Table 1.”
“Table 1 Setting monetary policy in four institutional frameworks”
A fifth inflation regression is discussed but not shown
MinorThe robustness discussion reports a result for regression 5, while the displayed table of inflation regressions has only columns 1 through 4. The referenced result cannot be matched to a reported regression.
“In regression 5 we rejected the political polarization specification in favor of the GDP specification.”
“Table 2 Checks and balances, polarization, and central bank independence Dependent variable: log inflation (1) (2) (3) (4)”
Cites
Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans
Kydland, F. E., & Prescott, E. C. (1977) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260580 · Cited by 7,905 · see citing works
North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1989) · The Journal of Economic History · doi:10.1017/s0022050700009451 · Cited by 5,300 · see citing works
The Optimal Degree of Commitment to an Intermediate Monetary Target
Rogoff, K. (1985) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1885679 · Cited by 3,688 · see citing works
Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy
Barro, R. J., & Gordon, D. B. (1983) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3932(83)90051-x · Cited by 3,610 · see citing works
Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work
Giné, V. L., & Tsebelis, G. (2003) · Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas · doi:10.2307/40184562 · Cited by 3,369 · see citing works
New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions
Beck, T. (2001) · The World Bank Economic Review · doi:10.1093/wber/15.1.165 · Cited by 2,762 · see citing works
Tsebelis, G. (1995) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123400007225 · Cited by 2,574 · see citing works
Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control
McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. R. V. (1987) · The Journal of Law Economics and Organization · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036930 · Cited by 2,250 · see citing works
A Positive Theory of Monetary Policy in a Natural Rate Model
Barro, R. J., & Gordon, D. B. (1983) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261167 · Cited by 2,214 · see citing works
A Positive Theory of Monetary Policy in a Natural-Rate Model
Barro, R. J., & Gordon, D. B. (1981) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w0807 · Cited by 2,180 · see citing works
Central bank independence and macroeconomic performance: some comparative evidence
Alesina, A., & Summers, L. H. (1993) · Journal of Money, Credit and Banking · doi:10.2307/2077833 · Cited by 1,833 · see citing works
Several Tests for Model Specification in the Presence of Alternative Hypotheses
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1981) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911522 · Cited by 1,747 · see citing works
Fuerst, T. S., & Walsh, C. E. (1999) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1061160 · Cited by 1,710 · see citing works
Measuring the Independence of Central Banks and Its Effect on Policy Outcomes
Alex Cukierman, A., Web, S. B., & Neyaptı, B. (1992) · The World Bank Economic Review · doi:10.1093/wber/6.3.353 · Cited by 1,710 · see citing works
The institutional environment for economic growth
Henisz, W. J. (2000) · Economics & Politics · doi:10.1111/1468-0343.00066 · Cited by 1,651 · see citing works
Political and Monetary Institutions and Public Financial Policies in the Industrial Countries
Grilli, V., Masciandaro, D., Tabellini, G., Malinvaud, E., & Pagano, M. (1991) · Economic Policy · doi:10.2307/1344630 · Cited by 1,585 · see citing works
(1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609312 · Cited by 1,060 · see citing works
Openness and Inflation: Theory and Evidence
Romer, D. (1993) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118453 · Cited by 970 · see citing works
Delegating powers: a transaction cost politics approach to policy making under separate powers
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-6536 · Cited by 912 · see citing works
Structure-induced equilibrium and legislative choice
Shepsle, K. A., & Weingast, B. R. V. (1981) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/bf00133748 · Cited by 780 · see citing works
Optimal Commitment in Monetary Policy: Credibility versus Flexibility
(1992) · Cited by 603 · see citing works
Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans
(2004) · doi:10.23865/magma.v7.1377 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Political Influence on the Central Bank: International Evidence
Alex Cukierman, A., & Webb, S. Β. (1995) · The World Bank Economic Review · doi:10.1093/wber/9.3.397 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Partially Independent Central Banks, Politically Responsive Governments, and Inflation
Franzese, R. J. (1999) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2991831 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Public debt and the birth of the democratic state: France and Great Britain, 1688-1789
(2003) · doi:10.5860/choice.41-2301 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Self-citationChecks and Balances, Private Information, and the Credibility of Monetary Commitments
(2002) · doi:10.1162/002081802760403766 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Self-citationMonetary Politics: The Federal Reserve and the Politics of Monetary Policy
(1984) · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Checks and balances, and the supply of central bank independence
Moser, P. (1999) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/s0014-2921(98)00045-2 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Representation or abdication? How citizens use institutions to help delegation succeed
Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (2000) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00514 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Apel, K. (1999) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/0161-1461.3001.98 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Credibility of Optimal Monetary Delegation
(1997) · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Preemptive Strike: Central Bank Reform in Chile's Transition from Authoritarian Rule
Boylan, D. M. (1998) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.2307/422333 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Openness and Inflation: Theory and Evidence
(1991) · doi:10.3386/w3936 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Sturm, J., & de Haan, J. (2001) · Cited by 34 · see citing works
A State within the State? An Event Study on the Bundesbank
(1997) · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Politics and the Determinants of Banking Crises: The Effects of Political Checks and Balances
(2001) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Banking and Currency Act of 1913: I
(1914) · doi:10.1086/252433 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The Banking and Currency Act of 1913: II
(1914) · doi:10.1086/252451 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
(1917) · doi:10.2307/1943987 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Representation or abdication? How citizens use institutions to help delegation succeed
Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (2000) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1023/a:1007068904236
Flagged first, then by citations
8 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [12]12. Goodman, John 1991. Monetary Sovereignty. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
THE POLITICAL EVOLUTION OF PRINCIPAL-AGENT MODELS
Miller, G. J. (2005) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104840 · Cited by 867 · see citing works
State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace
Davenport, C. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511510021 · Cited by 549 · see citing works
Economic growth and judicial independence: cross-country evidence using a new set of indicators
Feld, L. P., & Voigt, S. (2003) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/s0176-2680(03)00017-x · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Economic growth in the 1990s: learning from a decade of reform
Bank, W. (2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-2318 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Gilardi, F. (2005) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716204271833 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Testing the neocon agenda: Democracy in resource-rich societies
Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2008) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.05.006 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
“by a measure used by Keefer and Stasavage (2004) termed ‘checks’.”
MethodInstitutional distance and local isomorphism strategy
SALOMON, R. M., & Wu, Z. (2012) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2012.3 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
“To operationalize political distance, we use the CHECKS index drawn from the Database of Political Institutions (Beck, Clarke, Groff, Keefer, & Walsh, 2001; Keefer & Stasavage, 2003).”
BackgroundMethodThe Development of Stable Party Support: Electoral Dynamics in Post-Communist Europe
Tavits, M. (2005) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00123.x · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Price Stability and Central Bank Independence: Discipline, Credibility, and Democratic Institutions
Bodea, C., & Hicks, R. (2014) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818314000277 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Central bank independence and transparency: Evolution and effectiveness
Crowe, C., & Meade, E. E. (2008) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.06.004 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Neoliberal Economists and Capital Account Liberalization in Emerging Markets
Chwieroth, J. M. (2007) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818307070154 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
(2007) · doi:10.1162/rest.89.3.566 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Self-citationWhen Does Policy Reform Work? The Case of Central Bank Independence
Acemoğlu, D., Johnson, S., Querubín, P., & Robinson, J. A. (2008) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w14033 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
“Keefer and Stasavage (2002, 2003).”
The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy
Oatley, T. H. (2011) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s002081831100004x · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Oil rents, corruption, and state stability: Evidence from panel data regressions
Arezki, R., & Brüeckner, M. (2011) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2011.03.004 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Bono Made Jesse Helms Cry: Jubilee 2000, Debt Relief, and Moral Action in International Politics
Busby, J. W. (2007) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00451.x · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Bureaucracy and Service Delivery
Pepinsky, T. B., Pierskalla, J. H., & Sacks, A. (2017) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022705 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
“This work on delegation of crucial policymaking tasks to politically independent agencies has also played a major role in our understanding of central-banking in the developed and developing world (e.g., Adolph 2013, Keefer & Stasavage 2003).”
BackgroundKunčič, A. (2013) · Journal of Institutional Economics · doi:10.1017/s1744137413000192 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Gailmard, S., & Patty, J. W. (2012) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-031710-103314 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
INFLATION AND CENTRAL BANK INDEPENDENCE: A META-REGRESSION ANALYSIS
Klomp, J., & De Haan, J. (2010) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00597.x · Cited by 209 · see citing works
The political economy of reforms in Central Bank design: evidence from a new dataset
Romelli, D. (2022) · Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/epolic/eiac011 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Determinants of Donor Generosity: A Survey of the Aid Budget Literature
Fuchs, A., Dreher, A., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2013) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.09.004 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
“…(0-2) in orientation between the president’s party and the three biggest government parties and the largest opposition party (code: POLARIZ) DPI (Keefer and Stasavage 2003) H12 Checks and balances Extent of formal political control on political decision makers (code: CHECKS) DPI (Keefer and…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEconomic Growth and Judicial Independence: Cross Country Evidence Using a New Set of IndicatorsPreprint
Feld, L. P., & Voigt, S. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.395403 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Evaluating Three Explanations for the Design of Bilateral Investment Treaties
ALLEE, T. L., & Peinhardt, C. W. (2013) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887113000324 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Does high inflation cause central bankers to lose their job? Evidence based on a new data set
Dreher, A., Sturm, J., & de Haan, J. (2008) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.04.001 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Understanding Institutional Weakness
Brinks, D. M., Levitsky, S., & Murillo, M. V. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108772211 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
The use (and abuse) of governance indicators in economics: a review
Williams, A., & Siddique, A. (2007) · Economics of Governance · doi:10.1007/s10101-006-0025-9 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Secretaries of Pork? A New Theory of Distributive Public Policy
Bertelli, A. M., & Grose, C. R. (2009) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s002238160909080x · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Power-sharing in comparative perspective: the dynamics of ‘unity government’ in Kenya and Zimbabwe
Cheeseman, N., & Tendi, B.-M. (2010) · The Journal of Modern African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0022278x10000224 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Hartlyn, J., McCoy, J., & Mustillo, T. M. (2007) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414007301701 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Legislative Veto Players and the Effects of International Human Rights Agreements
Lupu, Y. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12178 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
When is a central bank governor replaced? Evidence based on a new data set
Dreher, A., Sturm, J., & de Haan, J. (2010) · Journal of Macroeconomics · doi:10.1016/j.jmacro.2010.04.001 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Foreign aid, institutional quality, and growth
(2014) · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.08.003 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Stadelmann, M., & Castro, P. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.011 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
“The variable was first coded by Keefer and Stasavage (2003), is at minimum one, and further increases the more veto players are involved in legislative decision-making.”
BackgroundKapstein, E. B., & Converse, N. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511817809 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Barriers to Peace in Civil War
Cunningham, D. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511993374 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Positive constitutional economics II—a survey of recent developments
Voigt, S. (2010) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-010-9638-1 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Political budget cycles in the European Union and the impact of political pressures
(2011) · doi:10.1007/s11127-011-9795-x · Cited by 146 · see citing works
“Information on each country’s election dates, forms of government, electoral rules, government fragmentation and government position on a left-right scale are retrieved from the World Bank’s Database of Political Institutions (Beck et al. 2001; Keefer and Stasavage 2003 ), and complemented, where needed, by the online…”
MethodInfluentialBagehot or Bailout? An Analysis of Government Responses to Banking Crises
Rosas, G. (2005) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00177.x · Cited by 143 · see citing works
A Review of the Political Economy of Governance: From Property Rights to Voice
Keefer, P. E. (2004) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-3315 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Self-citationBodea, C., & Hicks, R. (2014) · Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/678987 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Vaaler, P. M., Schrage, B. N., & Block, S. (2004) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400111 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
“Beck et al. (2001) explain the decision rules used for these DPI categorizations, which are widely used in recent academic research for purposes of assessing the partisan orientation of political parties in industrialized and developing country contexts (e.g., Stasavage and Keefer, 2003 ).”
MethodHow to Solve the Price Puzzle? A Meta‐Analysis
Rusnák, M., Havránek, T., & Horváth, R. (2013) · Journal of money credit and banking · doi:10.1111/j.1538-4616.2012.00561.x · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Are Parliamentary Systems Better?
Gerring, J., Thacker, S. C., & Moreno, C. (2008) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414008325573 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
“And only where institutions are constitutionally separate can the government attain credible commitment to a set of policies (Henisz, 2000; Keefer & Stasavage, 2003).”
BackgroundPolitical Polarization and the Size of Government
Lindqvist, E., & Östling, R. (2010) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055410000262 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
“Sources: Keefer and Stasavage (2003), but data have been obtained from the data set compiled by Beck et al.”
MethodInstitutionalized pollution havens
Cole, M., & Fredriksson, P. G. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.011 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
“Beck et al. (2001) and Keefer and Stasavage (2003) provide more information on CHECKS.”
BackgroundThe powers of the Union: delegation in the EU
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-4622 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
The Politics of Institutional Weakness in Latin America
Brinks, D. M., Levitsky, S., & Murillo, M. V. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108776608 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Political Polarization as a Constraint on Corruption: A Cross-national Comparison
Brown, D. S., Touchton, M., & Whitford, A. (2011) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.02.006 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
“Although polarization can be measured in a number of different ways, we chose a measure that has been used in previous work (Keefer and Stasavage, 2003). The measure we use was constructed by Beck, et al. (2001) as follows.”
MethodInfluentialDecentralization and Economic Performance in Indonesia
Pepinsky, T. B., & Wihardja, M. M. (2011) · Journal of East Asian Studies · doi:10.1017/s1598240800007372 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
The Formal Independence of Regulators: A Comparison of 17 Countries and 7 Sectors
(2005) · doi:10.1002/j.1662-6370.2005.tb00374.x · Cited by 124 · see citing works
“On the other hand, two opposite accounts have been given for the precise role of veto players in relation to delegation.4 Scholars studying central banks (e.g. Keefer and Stasavage 2002, 2003; Moser 1999) have argued that veto players are a precondition for credible delegation.”
BackgroundFitzgerald, J. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108377218 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Central Bank Independence and Transparency: Evolution and EffectivenessPreprint
Meade, E. E., & Crowe, C. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1112030 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Outside-In: The Effects of External Threat on State Centralization
Gibler, D. M. (2010) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002710370135 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Testing the ‘Party Matters' Thesis: Explaining Progress Towards Kyoto Protocol Targets
Jensen, C. B., & Spoon, J. (2010) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00852.x · Cited by 110 · see citing works
“Partisan veto players are political parties that occupy key positions within those institutions (see, for example, Alivizatos, 1995; Bassinger and Hallerberg, 2004; Bawn, 1999; Gilardi, 2002; Keefer and Stasavage, 2003; Thies, 2001; Tsebelis, 1995; 1999; 2002).”
BackgroundWHAT DOES POLITICAL ECONOMY TELL US ABOUT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT—AND VICE VERSA?
Keefer, P. E. (2004) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104846 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
“Considerable attention has, however, been dedicated to the role of political checks and balances, which make it difficult for any one political actor to act unilaterally towards citizens, and the 21 Keefer and Stasavage (2003) present another example that makes this point.”
BackgroundSelf-citationGoverning by Panic: The Politics of the Eurozone Crisis
(2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2513391 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Let's speak more? How the ECB responds to public contestation
(2020) · doi:10.1080/13501763.2020.1712457 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
“Indeed, several studies show that central bank independence is endogenous to the political system (Keefer & Stasavage, 2003) and that independence is more likely to be preserved if policymakers face high audience costs for interfering with the central bank’s structure and legal status (Lohmann,…”
BackgroundShall the law set them free? The formal and actual independence of regulatory agencies
(2012) · doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01156.x · Cited by 105 · see citing works
“These two proxy measures have a long history of application in the literature on central bank independence (Sturm & De Haan 2001; Keefer & Stasavage 2003; Dreher et al. 2008), and are now being applied to the independence of regulatory agencies (Montoya & Trillas 2009; Jordana & Ramió 2010) and…”
BackgroundSoil nitrogen availability, plant luxury consumption, and herbivory by white-tailed deer
Tripler, C. E., Canham, C. D., Inouye, R. S., & Schnurr, J. L. (2002) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-002-1046-x · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Central Bank Independence and Fiscal Policy: Can the Central Bank Restrain Deficit Spending?
Bodea, C., & Higashijima, M. (2015) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123415000058 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
“54 Keefer and Stasavage 2003; Moser 1999.”
InfluentialCentral banks’ communication as reputation management: How the Fed talks under uncertainty
Moschella, M., & Pinto, L. (2018) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12543 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
“In this case, the agency‘s reputational threats are magnified by threats to the agency‘s autonomy, since political audiences hold the key to revoking central bank independence (Keefer and Stasavage, 2003).”
BackgroundLegitimacy and Accountability of Independent Regulatory Agencies: A Critical Review
Maggetti, M. (2010) · IRIS · Cited by 97 · see citing works
The Contribution of Veto Players to Economic Reform
(2010) · doi:10.1017/s0022381610000460 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Institutional distance in international business research
Bae, J.-H., & SALOMON, R. M. (2010) · Advances in international management · doi:10.1108/s1571-5027(2010)00000230020 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Electoral Systems and the Balance of Consumer-Producer Power
Chang, E. C. C., Kayser, M. A. L. A. D., Linzer, D. A., & Rogowski, R. L. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511761423 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Analyzing the Global Political Economy
Walter, A., & Sen, G. (2009) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400837809 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Gilardi, F. (2007) · Comparative European Politics · doi:10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110098 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
“However, other scholars argue that in systems with few veto players, delegation itself is not credible and useless as a means to cope with political uncertainty, since it can be easily withdrawn (Lohmann, 1998; Keefer and Stasavage, 2003).”
BackgroundIndependent or lonely? Central banking in crisis
Mabbett, D., & Schelkle, W. (2019) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2018.1554539 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“…systems with multiple veto-players, the central bank enjoys discretion within the boundaries of the polarized preferences of presidents and legislatures, or states in a federation or monetary union (Keefer and Stasavage, 2003; Miller and Whitford, 2016, pp. 101–103; Tsebelis, 1995, p. 307).”
BackgroundPolitical and institutional determinants of immigration policies
Abou‐Chadi, T. (2016) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2016.1166938 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Institutions, Expectations, and Currency Crises
(2006) · doi:10.1017/s0020818306060073 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“…democracy variable so that we are capturing “democratic” elections+ 32+ See Leblang 2002, and Leblang 2003; Simmons 1992+ 33+ See Tsebelis 2002; and Keefer and Stasavage 2003+ the FR specification, the percentage of correct predictions goes up from 70 percent to 76 percent ~Table 4!+ When the…”
BackgroundVetoing the future: political constraints and renewable energy
Bayülgen, O., & Ladewig, J. W. (2016) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2016.1223189 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“There are many studies that confirm the effects of veto players (as either positive or negative) on economic policy, such as tax policy (Hallerberg and Basinger 1998), trade policy (Milner 1997, Henisz and Mansfield 2006), and monetary and fiscal policy (Keefer and Stasavage 2003).”
BackgroundThe Institutions Curse: Natural Resources, Politics, and Development
Menaldo, V. (2016) · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Understanding Institutional Weakness: Power and Design in Latin American Institutions
Brinks, D. M., Levitsky, S., & Murillo, M. V. (2019) · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Masciandaro, D., & Romelli, D. (2015) · Financial History Review · doi:10.1017/s0968565015000177 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Natural resource dependence, non-tradables, and economic growth
Brüeckner, M. (2010) · Journal of Comparative Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jce.2010.06.002 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“GDP, measured in log points in the base year 1970; the average investment rate, also measured in log points; and openness, defined as the fraction of years in which an economy is considered as open according to Sachs and Warner (1995).5 Additional control variables are: the Polity IV revised combined democracy score (…”
BackgroundInfluentialCentral Bank Independence Before and After the Crisis
de Haan, J., Bodea, C., Hicks, R., & Eijffinger, S. C. W. (2018) · Comparative Economic Studies · doi:10.1057/s41294-017-0050-4 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“…allow the legislation governing the central bank to have a de facto bite, i.e., in countries with strong democratic institutions (Broz 2002; Bodea and Hicks 2015), multiple veto players (Moser 1999; Keefer and Stasavage 2003; Hayo and Voigt 2008) or a strong, free press (Bodea and Hicks 2015).”
BackgroundThe symbolic politics of delegation: macroprudential policy and independent regulatory authorities
(2016) · doi:10.1080/13563467.2016.1198758 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“…several policy areas, including, for example, telecommunication and monetary policy, and has been used to explain patterns of delegation at both the domestic and international levels (among others Majone 2001, Thatcher and Sweet 2002, Keefer and Stasavage 2003, Pollack 2003, Hawkins et al. 2006).”
BackgroundContracting with Whom? The Differential Effects of Investment Treaties on FDI
Danzman, S. B. (2016) · International Interactions · doi:10.1080/03050629.2016.1121451 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Weymouth, S. J. (2010) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414010382629 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“…separation of purpose.3 Subsequent work on the economic effects of veto players emphasizes how these institutions help governments overcome credibility problems resulting from time-inconsistent incentives by making policy changes more difficult (Keefer and Stasavage, 2002, 2003; Stasavage, 2002b).”
(2005) · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Agoba, A., Abor, J., Osei, K., & Sa-Aadu, J. (2020) · Journal of African Business · doi:10.1080/15228916.2019.1584263 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“Consequently, the credibility of independent central banks to pursue price stability and abide by legal limitations on providing finance to government is enhanced in such situations (Keefer & Stasavage, 2003).”
BackgroundPolitical Institutions, Credible Commitment, and Sovereign Debt in Advanced Economies
Breen, M., & McMenamin, I. (2013) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/isqu.12079 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
von Stein, J. (2020) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s000712342000054x · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“These ideas find support in a wide array of other policy areas, including budget deficits, monetary policy and trade agreements (Keefer and Stasavage 2003; Tsebelis 2002).”
BackgroundThe Political Economy of Reforms in Central Bank Design: Evidence from a New DatasetPreprint
Romelli, D. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3235209 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
“…finds that legal independence is higher in OECD countries with legislative processes characterized by extensive checks and balances, while in Keefer and Stasavage (2003) mon- etary policy credibility (captured by a lower governor turnover rate) is enhanced by the presence of multiple veto…”
Agoba, A. M., Abor, J. Y., Osei, K. A., & Sa‐Aadu, J. (2017) · Central Bank Review · doi:10.1016/j.cbrev.2017.11.001 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Globalization, Politics, and Financial Turmoil: Asia's Banking Crisis
Satyanath, S. (2009) · Cited by 59 · see citing works
The role of political institutions for the effectiveness of central bank independence
Hielscher, K., & Markwardt, G. (2012) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.08.004 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
“For example, Keefer and Stasavage (2003) show that the effectiveness of central bank independence in strengthening credibility and enhancing inflation performance is increased by the presence of multiple political veto players.”
Sovereign credit ratings and central banks: Why do analysts pay attention to institutions?
Bodea, C., & Hicks, R. (2018) · Economics and Politics · doi:10.1111/ecpo.12113 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Making rules credible: divided government and political budget cycles
(2012) · doi:10.1007/s11127-012-9923-2 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“Depending 1While our focus is on the credibility of rules, Lohmann (1998b) and Keefer and Stasavage (2003) make a related point on the credibility of delegation: an independent central bank, the Rogoff (1985) solution to the time consistency problem of monetary policy, is not credible unless there…”
BackgroundBodea, C., Garriga, A. C., & Higashijima, M. (2019) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/701831 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Party System Institutionalization, Accountability and Governmental Corruption
Schleiter, P., & Voznaya, A. (2016) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123415000770 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
(2019) · doi:10.1111/twec.12889 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“In addition, we use checks and balances from Keefer and Stasavage (2003) as an indicator of political constraint.”
Method
- Authors
- KEEFER, P., & STASAVAGE, D.
- Affiliations
- World Bank (US)
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 03
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2132773002
- Cited by
- 667
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 55.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Global Financial Crisis and Policies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
- Keywords
- veto players, central bank independence, monetary policy credibility, delegation, checks and balances, agenda control, political polarization, central bank governors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review