Cited by 667Fiscal Policies and Political EconomyGlobal Financial Crisis and PoliciesMonetary Policy and Economic Impact

The Limits of Delegation: Veto Players, Central Bank Independence, and the Credibility of Monetary Policy

Open access
KEEFER, PHILIP, STASAVAGE, DAVID·2003·American Political Science Review

Abstract

Governments unable to make credible promises hinder economic development and effective policymaking. Scholars have focused considerable attention on checks and balances and the delegation of authority to independent agencies as institutional solutions to this problem. The political conditions under which these institutions enhance credibility, rather than policy stability, are still unclear, however. We show that checks—multiple veto players—enhance credibility, depending on the extent of uncertainty about the location of the status quo, on how agenda control is allocated among the veto players, and on whether veto players have delegated policymaking authority to independent agencies. In the context of monetary policy and independent central banks, we find evidence supporting the following predictions: Delegation is more likely to enhance credibility and political replacements of central bank governors are less likely in the presence of multiple political veto players; this effect increases with the polarization of veto players.We have benefited from the generous advice of many people, including Alberto Alesina, Tim Besley, Georgios Chortareas, Roberta Gatti, Simon Hug, Stephan Haggard, Witold Henisz, Aart Kraay, Francesca Recanatini, and Mary Shirley, and from comments of seminar participants at DELTA (Paris), George Mason, and Oxford. Three anonymous referees and the editor were especially helpful. This paper's findings, interpretations, and conclusions are entirely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of The World Bank, its executive directors, or the countries they represent.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0003055403000777

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

1 of 15 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Using J-tests, we rejected the GDP specification in favor of the original specifications in Table 1 regressions 2-4.

    “Using J-tests first proposed by Davidson and MacKinnon (1981), we rejected the GDP specification in favor of the original specifications in Table 1 regressions 2-4.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Davidson and MacKinnon (1981) source
  • Findingown data

    Political replacements of central bank governors are less likely in the presence of multiple political veto players.

    “we find evidence supporting the following predictions: delegation is more likely to enhance credibility and political replacements of central bank governors are less likely in the presence of multiple political veto players; this effect increases with the polarization of veto players.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Multiple veto players can increase credibility (reduce inflation).

    “These tests use new data both on political institutions and on political polarization and show that multiple veto players can increase credibility (reduce inflation)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Legal central bank independence is more likely to reduce inflation in the presence of multiple political veto players.

    “that legal central bank independence is more likely to reduce inflation in the presence of multiple political veto players”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Delegation to an independent central bank is more likely to enhance credibility in the presence of multiple political veto players.

    “we find evidence supporting the following predictions: delegation is more likely to enhance credibility and political replacements of central bank governors are less likely in the presence of multiple political veto players; this effect increases with the polarization of veto players.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 23
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 22
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The interaction term CBI*polcon is negative and statistically significant.

    “The interaction term CBI*polcon is negative and statistically significant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The addition of a second, non-agenda setting veto player increases policy credibility, with the effect rising in the magnitude of the preference differences between the two veto players.

    “Second, the addition of a second, non-agenda setting veto player increases policy credibility, with the effect rising in the magnitude of the preference differences between the two veto players.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The Regression 4 result is robust to the linear inclusion of log check.

    “This result in Regression 4 is also robust to the linear inclusion of log check to the regression.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The coefficient on the interaction term CBI*political polarization in Regression 4 is negative and statistically significant.

    “The coefficient on the interaction term CBI*political polarization in Regression 4 is negative and statistically significant, supporting Prediction 2.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The coefficient on log check is negative and significant.

    “the coefficient on log check is negative and significant”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In each of the three regressions the interaction term pol inst.*CEO has the expected negative sign and is statistically significant for log check and political constraints.

    “In each of the three regressions the interaction term has the expected negative sign and is statistically significant for log check and political constraints.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In our sample we find little evidence that central bank independence is endogenous to lagged inflation, nor is CBI endogenous to contemporary inflation.

    “Empirically, in our sample we find little evidence that central bank independence is endogenous to lagged inflation, nor is CBI endogenous to contemporary inflation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The estimated effect on log inflation of a one-standard-deviation increase in central bank independence is negative for two and three veto players and near zero for one veto player.

    “one veto player 0.002 (0.077) 0.238 (0.110) two veto players -0.116 (0.088) -0.094 (0.058) three veto players -0.208 (0.116) -0.182 (0.066)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Our results are robust to two other variables omitted in Table 1, and to the exclusion of influential outliers.

    “Our results are also robust to two other variables omitted in Table 1, and to the exclusion of influential outliers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    When entered into Table 1 regressions, the log of real GDP per capita is never significant and leaves the estimates of the interaction terms nearly unchanged.

    “However, when entered into our Table 1 regressions, the log of real GDP per capita is never significant and leaves the estimates of the interaction terms nearly unchanged.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    In regression 5 we rejected the political polarization specification in favor of the GDP specification.

    “In regression 5 we rejected the political polarization specification in favor of the GDP specification.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Results of Lagrange multiplier tests suggest serial correlation of the error terms might have led to inconsistent estimates of standard errors in the tests in Table 1.

    “Results of Lagrange multiplier tests suggest serial correlation of the error terms might have led to inconsistent estimates of standard errors in the tests in Table 1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The coefficients on both proxies for the number of veto players are negative and significant, as is the coefficient on political polarization.

    “The coefficients on both proxies for the number of veto players are negative and significant, as is the coefficient on political polarization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The conditional standard error of the CEO effect is quite sizeable in all regressions; even at very high levels of checks and balances, it is impossible to reject the hypothesis that the effect is zero.

    “However, the conditional standard error of this effect is quite sizeable in all regressions -even at very high levels of checks and balances, it is impossible to reject the hypothesis that the effect is zero.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    In the central bank governor turnover regression, the interaction between CEO and log check has a negative coefficient of -0.518 (SE 0.299).

    “CEO * log check -.518 (.299)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Multiple veto players (checks and balances) enhance policy credibility, but the effect depends on uncertainty about the location of the status quo, on how agenda control is allocated among the veto players, and on whether veto players have delegated policy making authority to independent agencies.

    “We show that checks -multiple veto players -enhance credibility, depending on the extent of uncertainty about the location of the status quo, on how agenda control is allocated among the veto players, and on whether veto players have delegated policy making authority to independent agencies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Politicians might delegate to increase policy credibility, but delegation has this effect only in the presence of multiple veto players with polarized preferences.

    “Our results suggest that politicians might also delegate to increase policy credibility, but that delegation has this effect only in the presence of multiple veto players with polarized preferences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The effects of additional veto players on policy outcomes depend on whether their preferences diverge from those of existing veto players.

    “emphasizing, for example, that the effects of additional veto players on policy outcomes depend on whether their preferences diverge from those of existing veto players.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tsebelis (1995, 2002)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Policy credibility varies with the number and polarization of preferences of veto players, but the underlying logic differs from policy stability.

    “In the analysis that follows, we show that policy credibility varies with the number and polarization of preferences of veto players, but the underlying logic is different.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Decade dummy variables control for unobserved characteristics specific to each time period.

    “We also follow Cukierman, Webb, and Neyapti (1992) and include decade dummy variables to control for unobserved characteristics specific to each time period.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cukierman, Webb, and Neyapti (1992)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The checks variable is explicitly incremented when a party in the government has an economic policy orientation closer to that of the main opposition party than to that of the party of the executive.

    “In addition, unlike political constraints, the checks variable is explicitly incremented when a party in the government has an economic policy orientation closer to that of the main opposition party than to that of the party of the executive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Keefer (2002)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Qualitative evidence from specific instances of confrontation between central bankers and political decision makers provides further support for the analysis here.

    “Qualitative evidence emerging from specific instances of confrontation between central bankers and political decision makers provides further support for the analysis here.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The model underlines the importance of taking political institutions and preferences into account when examining the impact of administrative arrangements such as central bank independence.

    “The model underlines the importance of taking political institutions and preferences into account when examining the impact of administrative arrangements such as central bank independence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Multiple veto players can increase policy credibility as well as policy stability.

    “Multiple veto players therefore can increase policy credibility as well as policy stability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Romer (1993) argues that as imports increase as a share of total consumption, policy makers have less of an ex post incentive to inflate.

    “This follows Romer (1993), who argues that as imports increase as a share of total consumption, policy makers have less of an ex post incentive to inflate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Romer (1993) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Prediction 3 has not been previously tested and provides supporting evidence for the primary thesis that central bank independence depends on checks and balances.

    “This is Prediction 3, which has also not been previously tested and provides supporting evidence for the primary thesis that central bank independence depends on checks and balances.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Tsebelis (2002) argues persuasively that the number of veto players affects policy only insofar as the veto players have divergent policy preferences.

    “Tsebelis (2002) argues persuasively that the number of veto players affects policy only insofar as the veto players have divergent policy preferences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tsebelis (2002)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Legal independence can reduce inflation bias in both developed and developing countries, but this depends on the level of checks and balances in a country's political system.

    “Our results suggest that legal independence can reduce inflation bias in both developed and developing countries, but that this depends on the level of checks and balances in a country's political system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Tests of Proposition 1 must treat veto players with the same preferences as only a single veto player.

    “To be consistent with this condition, tests of Proposition 1 must therefore treat veto players with the same preferences as only a single veto player.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The political polarization measure is simultaneously a proxy for the number of veto players in a country because it takes a value of zero for systems with only one veto player.

    “In addition, however, since it takes a value of zero for systems with only one veto player, it is simultaneously a proxy for the number of veto players in a country.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The two recently developed measures of checks and balances have the advantage of being based on objective criteria and of capturing the existence of coalition governments or divided control of two chambers in a bicameral system.

    “They have the advantage of being based on objective criteria and of capturing the existence of coalition governments or divided control of two chambers in a bicameral system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Both checks and balances indicators rise with the number of veto points and fall when the veto points are occupied by the same political party.

    “Both of these indicators rise with the number of veto points (depending upon the number of legislative chambers) and fall when the veto points are occupied by the same political party (depending on whether majorities are multi-party coalitions).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Prediction 2, regarding the effect of increasing polarization among veto players, has not been previously tested.

    “Prediction 2, regarding the effect of increasing polarization among veto players, has not been previously tested.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Delegation improves policy credibility because it is more difficult for multiple veto players to agree to overturn an agency's decision than their own.

    “Delegation improves policy credibility because it is more difficult for multiple veto players to agree to overturn an agency's decision than their own.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Multiple veto players in government make it more difficult to reverse a decision to delegate, giving independent central banks greater scope to reduce the inflation bias.

    “As we do, they argue that multiple veto players in government make it more difficult to reverse a decision to delegate, giving independent central banks greater scope to reduce the inflation bias.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lohmann (1998)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Moser (1999) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Cukierman, Webb, and Neyapti (1992) show that the rate of turnover of central bank governors is positively and significantly correlated with inflation in a sample including both developed and developing countries.

    “Cukierman, Webb, and Neyapti (1992) argue that high turnover of central bank governors is indicative of low independence, and they show that the rate of turnover is positively and significantly correlated with inflation in a sample including both developed and developing countries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cukierman, Webb, and Neyapti (1992)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A number of papers have found a statistically significant relationship between legal measures of central bank independence and inflation in advanced industrialized economies.

    “A number of papers have found a statistically significant relationship between legal measures of central bank independence and inflation in advanced industrialized economies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The analysis is consistent with substantial research, beginning with Rogoff (1985), that shows that even an inflation-tolerant political actor might prefer to delegate authority to a conservative central banker in the presence of unpredictable economic shocks.

    “However, the analysis above is consistent with substantial research, beginning with Rogoff (1985), that shows that even an inflation-tolerant political actor might prefer to delegate authority to a conservative central banker in the presence of unpredictable economic shocks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rogoff (1985) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    If there were only one veto player, policy would always be at that player's preferred outcome, with or without the central bank; any attempt by the central bank to propose a different inflation rate would be immediately overridden.

    “What if v 1 or v 2 were the only veto player?Then policy would always be at their preferred outcome, with or without the central bank; any attempt by the central bank to propose a different inflation rate would be immediately overridden by the single veto player.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Delegation enhances credible commitment more when the interests of competing veto players are more divergent and when the interests of the non-agenda setter are closer to those of the agency to which authority has been delegated.

    “Delegation enhances credible commitment, and does so the more divergent are the interests of the competing veto players and, especially, the closer are the interests of the non-agenda setter to those of the agency to which authority has been delegated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The central bank is more inflation-averse than either of the political actors.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The most inflation-averse veto player prefers the outcome under checks and balances to the most preferred outcome of the central banker.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The economic shock ε is distributed uniformly over the range [-c, c].
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The Fed was able to pursue a more aggressive policy than the veto players preferred.

    “Knowing this, the Fed was able to pursue a more aggressive policy than the veto players preferred.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The evidence presented in the robustness section indicates that serial correlation, endogeneity, omitted variables, and outliers do not provide plausible alternative explanations of the empirical findings.

    “The evidence presented in this section indicates that these do not provide plausible alternative explanations of our empirical findings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The evidence for the paper's points derives from diverse institutional settings in the developed and developing world.

    “The evidence for many of these points is direct and, unlike much of the empirical evidence in this area it derives from diverse institutional settings in the developed and developing world.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
43 of 43
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Governments unable to make credible commitments cannot stimulate economic growth (and tax collections) by promising a stable tax and regulatory environment.

    “When governments are unable to make credible commitments (e.g., to follow a set of rules tomorrow that they announce today), they cannot stimulate economic growth (and tax collections) by, for example, promising a stable tax and regulatory environment for firms.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Private actors form inflation expectations and write contracts before the government sets monetary policy.

    “Before the government actually sets monetary policy, however, private actors must form inflation expectations and write contracts governing the future sale of goods and services.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    There is one player with agenda-setting authority—the ability to make a take-it-or-leave-it offer to the other player.

    “We assume throughout the paper that there is one player with agenda-setting authority -the ability to make a take-it-or-leave-it offer to the other player.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The default inflation outcome confronting politicians is endogenous: it is the product of private sector decisions made in anticipation of politicians' decisions.

    “the default outcome we employ in the models below -the inflation that prevails in the absence of government action in the second period -is the set of price increases programmed by the private sector into its contracts in the first period.”
    “the status quo here is endogenous: the default inflation outcome confronting politicians is the product of private sector decisions that are made in anticipation of the decisions of politicians.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The private sector does not observe the random supply shock.

    “However, the private sector does not observe the random supply shock, and therefore cannot know for sure what decision the veto players will make upon observing the private sector's contracts.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The central bank has no informational or other advantages over the government.

    “Delegation to a central bank is traditionally analyzed within the context of the single veto player model outlined above, where the central bank has no informational or other advantages over the government.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The central bank, rather than the private sector, sets the default rate of inflation that political veto players must accept if they choose not to override it.

    “The key attribute of an independent central bank is that it, rather than the private sector, sets the default rate of inflation that political veto players must accept if they choose not to override it.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Central bank independence is treated as exogenous.

    “These examples provide a justification for the decision made in this paper to treat central bank independence as exogenous.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The six months following changes in government is a period where any political influence on central bank governors is most likely to be exercised.

    “Cukierman and Webb (1995) collect data on the frequency with which central bank governors are replaced in the six months following changes in government, a period where any political influence is most likely to be exercised.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The central bank is more inflation-averse than either of the political actors.

    “First, the central bank is assumed to be more inflation-averse than either of the political actors”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The most inflation-averse veto player prefers the outcome under checks and balances to the most preferred outcome of the central banker.

    “Third, to avoid trivial cases, the most inflation-averse veto player prefers the outcome under checks and balances to the most preferred outcome of the central banker.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The economic shock ε is distributed uniformly over the range [-c, c].

    “assume ε is distributed uniformly over the range[-c, c].”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The probabilities of the four decision making outcomes sum to one.

    “where the q i 's are the probabilities of each of the four decision making outcomes and sum to one”
13 of 13

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is consensus in theory and practice that monetary policy faces commitment problems and that granting independence to the monetary policy authority can help overcome them with the right institutional design.

    “there is consensus in theory and practice that monetary policy faces commitment problems and that granting independence to the monetary policy authority can help overcome them with the right institutional design (see Keefer and Stasavage 2003).”

    From Independent Agencies, Distribution, and Legitimacy: The Case of Central Banks (2020) · cites this paper as Keefer and Stasavage 2003

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Governor-turnover measure has two different triggering events

    Minor

    One description says the measure counts replacements after a change in government; another says it counts replacements after elections. Elections do not necessarily change the government, so these definitions cover different events.

  • Governor-turnover regressions are assigned to Table 3

    Minor

    The cited regressions concern governor turnover, but Table 3 reports estimated effects on inflation. The six governor-turnover regressions appear in Table 4.

  • Robustness tests point to the wrong table

    Minor

    The robustness section describes regressions and their standard errors as being in Table 1, but Table 1 describes monetary-policy decision sequences. The inflation regressions are in Table 2.

  • A fifth inflation regression is discussed but not shown

    Minor

    The robustness discussion reports a result for regression 5, while the displayed table of inflation regressions has only columns 1 through 4. The referenced result cannot be matched to a reported regression.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]12. Goodman, John 1991. Monetary Sovereignty. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KEEFER, P., & STASAVAGE, D.
Affiliations
  • World Bank (US)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Venue
American Political Science Review
Published
2003-08
Volume
97
Issue
03
ISSN
  • 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5943
OpenAlex
W2132773002
Cited by
667
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 38
FWCI
55.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Global Financial Crisis and Policies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Keywords
veto players, central bank independence, monetary policy credibility, delegation, checks and balances, agenda control, political polarization, central bank governors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review