Cited by 639Human-Animal Interaction StudiesGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

From wild animals to domestic pets, an evolutionary view of domestication

Open access
Driscoll, Carlos A., Macdonald, David W., O'Brien, Stephen J.·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Artificial selection is the selection of advantageous natural variation for human ends and is the mechanism by which most domestic species evolved. Most domesticates have their origin in one of a few historic centers of domestication as farm animals. Two notable exceptions are cats and dogs. Wolf domestication was initiated late in the Mesolithic when humans were nomadic hunter-gatherers. Those wolves less afraid of humans scavenged nomadic hunting camps and over time developed utility, initially as guards warning of approaching animals or other nomadic bands and soon thereafter as hunters, an attribute tuned by artificial selection. The first domestic cats had limited utility and initiated their domestication among the earliest agricultural Neolithic settlements in the Near East. Wildcat domestication occurred through a self-selective process in which behavioral reproductive isolation evolved as a correlated character of assortative mating coupled to habitat choice for urban environments. Eurasian wildcats initiated domestication and their evolution to companion animals was initially a process of natural, rather than artificial, selection over time driven during their sympatry with forbear wildcats.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0901586106

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Driscoll, C. A., Macdonald, D. W., & O'Brien, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-06-16
Volume
106
Issue
supplement_1
Pages
9971-9978
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2076249643
Cited by
639
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI
9.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
animal domestication, selective breeding, wolf domestication, dog domestication, cats, Mesolithic, Neolithic, companion animals, reproductive isolation, assortative mating, habitat selection, sympatry, domestication syndrome
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Domestic, Cats, Dogs, Biological Evolution, Humans, Sexual Behavior, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review