Cited by 42Diet, Metabolism, and DiseaseNutritional Studies and DietFood composition and properties

Dietary intake of carbohydrates and risk of type 2 diabetes: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer-Norfolk study

Open access
Ahmadi-Abhari, Sara, Luben, Robert N., Powell, Natasha, Bhaniani, Amit, Chowdhury, Rajiv, Wareham, Nicholas J., Forouhi, Nita G., Khaw, Kay-Tee·2014·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated the association between dietary intake of carbohydrates and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Incident cases of diabetes (n 749) were identified and compared with a randomly selected subcohort of 3496 participants aged 40–79 years. For dietary assessment, we used 7 d food diaries administered at baseline. We carried out modified Cox proportional hazards regression analyses and compared results obtained from the different methods of adjustment for total energy intake. Dietary intakes of total carbohydrates, starch, sucrose, lactose or maltose were not significantly related to diabetes risk after adjustment for confounders. However, in the residual method for energy adjustment, intakes of fructose and glucose were inversely related to diabetes risk. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of diabetes comparing the extreme quintiles of intake were 0·79 (95 % CI 0·59, 1·07; P for trend = 0·03) for glucose and 0·62 (95 % CI 0·46, 0·83; P for trend = 0·01) for fructose. In the nutrient density method, only fructose was inversely related to diabetes risk (HR 0·65, 95 % CI 0·48, 0·88). The replacement of 5 % energy intake from SFA with an isoenergetic amount of fructose was associated with a 30 % lower diabetes risk (HR 0·69, 95 % CI 0·50, 0·96). Results of the standard and energy partition methods were similar to those of the residual method. These prospective findings suggest that the intakes of starch and sucrose are not associated, but that those of fructose and glucose are inversely associated with diabetes risk. Whether the inverse associations with fructose and glucose reflect the effect of substitution of these carbohydrate subtypes with other nutrients (i.e. SFA), their net higher intake or other nutrients associated with their intake remains to be established through further investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114513002298

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists and the risk of acute pancreatitis is negative.

    “The association between the use of GLP‐1 receptor agonists and the risk of acute pancreatitis has been shown to be negative 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 .”

    From Japanese clinical practice guideline for diabetes 2019 (2020) · cites this paper as [27]

  • Coffee or tea intake is a preventive factor against type 2 diabetes.

    “Coffee or tea intake is shown to be a preventive factor against type 2 diabetes 26 , 27 .”

    From Japanese clinical practice guideline for diabetes 2019 (2020) · cites this paper as [27]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rothman K, Greenland S & Timothy L (2008) Modern Epide- miology, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmadi-Abhari, S., Luben, R. N., Powell, N., Bhaniani, A., Chowdhury, R., Wareham, N. J., Forouhi, N. G., & Khaw, K.-T.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Wellcome/MRC Institute of Metabolic Science (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2013-07-23
Volume
111
Issue
2
Pages
342-352
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W1998838608
Cited by
42
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10165)
  • British Heart Foundation (RG/08/014/24067)
  • Stroke Association
  • University of Cambridge
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/5, MR/L003120/1, MC_UU_12015/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, dietary carbohydrates, fructose, glucose, starch, sucrose, saturated fatty acids, dietary intake, food diary, residual method, incident diabetes risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, England, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review